• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Who’s “Dreaming Big”—Students or IBM?

October 26, 2013 By Nancy Bailey Leave a Comment

Post Views: 13

Here’s the question.Is it helping disadvantaged teens to plug them into corporately-designed programs, starting when they are in ninth grade, steering them through six years of training where they will wind up with an Associate’s Degree related to a corporation? Should this be the purpose of all schooling in America? Is it right for teenagers? Or, is it social engineering?

Yesterday President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan visited a school, Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-Tech). The president spoke about how American students needed to keep up with students in different countries…the usual “we’ve got to compete or perish” spiel http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/26/nyregion/obama-visits-brooklyn-high-school.html. Many Americans have figured out the school/economy strings aren’t as tight as they’ve been told. But poverty is insidious, and if this kind of set-up leads to employment for students shouldn’t it be considered?   

P-Tech focuses on “Staffing, Scheduling, and the Strategic Use of Data and Monitoring” called the “3S Model.” This in itself sounds flowery to me. It relies heavily on online instruction and, of course, Common Core. It is a private-public partnership. IBM provides a mentor for each student. Students and parents sign on to rigor. Coursework is accelerated with 90 minute classes in English, mathematics, workplace learning, technology, global history and physics. There is no mention of other kinds of classes like the arts. The emphasis is on acceleration http://citizenibm.com/2012/10/p-tech-where-we-are-now.html.  

So is it right to lead 9-12th graders into IBM at this stage in their lives? Vocational education in high school has always been debated. But a lot of real high schools in New York City have closed, and the Federal Sequestration is to cut $1.2 trillion from vocational schools according to Joy Resmovits in the Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/25/obama-p-tech_n_4160548.html. The idea is to switch from vocational education to career-technical education, updating the kinds of work-related skills for students. But what do students miss out in this process? It seems too narrow.

And there are mixed messages with P-Tech http://citizenibm.com/2012/02/p-tech-the-first-100-days.html. For example, what does it mean to “grow more people capable of working in our business”? If all students learn is how to work at IBM, will they really be ready for another career if they attend a regular college or if IBM downsizes? And why is there such urgency?

The statement is also made claiming IBM mentors are “engaged and involved in helping to build the curriculum” and their “developing a new model for education is totally consistent with IBM’s values and IBM’s culture.” But is this a “public” education? The answer is no. What about other careers? Where do parents and teachers fit in?

I have never minded corporations sending workers to schools as tutors. This was often the case when I taught middle school in Tallahassee, Florida in the 1980s. I valued their mentoring and found those from business to be caring individuals. But there is something different about a real credentialed teacher providing the tutor with work for the student to do. In the current situation it is all about the mentors who are not real educators. Teachers seem to take a secondary role. 

The President clearly likes this kind of school set-up. He spoke about it in his State of the Union address and he wants to see more schools like P-Tech. Since the school is only two years old, another question might be what’s the hurry? Like Common Core State Standards (which will be included in P-Tech’s curriculum) there appears to be no plans for piloting one or two of these schools first. Instead, Chicago will see five P-Techs opening there working with Microsoft, Motorola and Verizon. New York will see sixteen partnerships http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/08282013Students-for-High-Skill-Jobs.

I suppose if everything else in education didn’t seem so draconian I might think a little more positively about programs like this for at-risk students. But like everything else, it has too much of a corporate rubber stamp and I’d rather see students able to broaden their horizons, not streamline them. They are, after all, still children.   

It also scarily reminds me of what some considered a “blueprint for reform.” Reinventing Education: Entrepreneurship in America’s Public School was written in 1995 with false claims that our public schools were failing and how they needed to be part of a “computer revolution.” The book was co-authored by Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., Chairman and CEO of IBM.    

Filed Under: Common Core, Technology Tagged With: Career Technical Education, Common Core, Corporations, IBM, P-Tech, Vocational Education

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
plthomasedd Paul Thomas @plthomasedd ·
1h

The Science of Scarcity and Sleep that Education Reformers (Want to) Ignore https://radicalscholarship.com/2023/03/20/the-science-of-scarcity-and-sleep-that-education-reformers-want-to-ignore/ via @plthomasEdD

Reply on Twitter 1638146543768174597 Retweet on Twitter 1638146543768174597 3 Like on Twitter 1638146543768174597 3 Twitter 1638146543768174597
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
21h

Things to ponder about the current discussions around SOR. From ChatGPT @ChatwithGPT
https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/?fbclid=IwAR0Fhkczq46nJq8n5ob1q2xF5Q9aFc9ya04TEgYCaVTyEElEQg_UbWfoROY

Reply on Twitter 1637853806833590275 Retweet on Twitter 1637853806833590275 8 Like on Twitter 1637853806833590275 26 Twitter 1637853806833590275
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
19 Mar

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 18 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 45 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
deguire_mike Mike DeGuire, Ph. D. @deguire_mike ·
14h

"The privatization movement has been strategically designed...by billionaires and their fellow investors for specific purposes: to lower their own tax burden, and ideologically to dismantle public education." @NPEaction @NancyEBailey1 @TheAndySpears
https://medium.com/@jfiske80/billionaires-and-their-investors-are-impacting-education-policies-in-colorado-and-especially-in-c523579674af

Reply on Twitter 1637957759751831558 Retweet on Twitter 1637957759751831558 10 Like on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Twitter 1637957759751831558
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nepctweet NEPC @nepctweet ·
19h

"Let’s honor our students by providing them free quality democratic public schools that reject no one." @NancyEBailey1 https://bit.ly/3FE0KFA

Reply on Twitter 1637870110840094721 Retweet on Twitter 1637870110840094721 3 Like on Twitter 1637870110840094721 2 Twitter 1637870110840094721
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.