• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Larger Classes Help Students with Disabilities? Who Does the Illinois Bd. of Ed. Think It’s Fooling?

January 14, 2014 By Nancy Bailey Leave a Comment

Post Views: 39

The Illinois Board of Education believes larger general education classes will help children with disabilities http://action.aft.org/c/468/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=7727.  Restricting the size or providing self-contained classes would do them a disservice. Really? Shame on them! Who do they think they are fooling? Consider this profound statement:

“The elimination of state requirements specific to class size will best ensure that each student with disabilities is placed in the least restrictive environment (LRE), as directed by his or her Individualized Education Program (IEP), and has access to the broad array of coursework available to his or her nondisabled peers, particularly in the middle grades and high school.”

http://isbe.net/board/meetings/2013/feb/packet.pdf p.11.

Will the IEP really rule here? It should.  But more and more it is being cast aside. School boards use language so convoluted it tricks or confuses parents and educators into thinking they have the best interest of the child at heart. Some parents will jump at the chance to get their student with disabilities into a regular class. But most realize only with individualized attention will they get the help they need. They aren’t going to get that help in a larger class size no matter what anyone says.

And where do Common Core State Standards come into play? I’m wondering.

To say you are going to provide the student with a “broad array of coursework available to his or her nondisabled peers” is deceiving. What they really mean is that there will be no individualization.

Parents in Illinois should ask the school board, “In that larger regular class, how much support will my child get from a special education teacher? Will they get any support at all in the regular class?” Then, if this passes, keep checking to make sure they are getting support, and how often.

There is nothing really surprising about this. They have been chipping away at the old Public Law 94-142 for a long time now. They took away a lot with the re-authorization to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1997 and again in 2004. Ask yourselves. Why did we need those re-authorizations? Why did they want to change the original law?

They want to get rid of special education. It is costly, the students are challenging and there is a group who believe all you have to do is wave a magic wand.

But students with disabilities need services. They won’t all get those services in a over-sized general education class. Thankfully, a lot of advocacy groups—and parents and educators—know this in Illinois. Even students without disabilities need smaller class sizes http://www.classsizematters.org/. Large class sizes make no sense.

They are trying to place the least restrictive environment over the IEP to get what they want.

The IEP teams should ignore the Illinois Board of Education and continue to choose appropriate placements for special ed. students, and special ed. should not be used as some kind of foolish bargaining chip to lift caps on class size in general education.

Filed Under: Special Education Tagged With: class size, Illinois Board of Education, Individual Educational Plan (IEP), Least Restrictive Environment (LRE), Students with Disabilities

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
13h

Reading Aloud to Kids of all ages pays off!

Reply on Twitter 1637488064929976329 Retweet on Twitter 1637488064929976329 119 Like on Twitter 1637488064929976329 329 Twitter 1637488064929976329
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
12h

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 12 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 30 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
jamaalbowmanny Jamaal Bowman Ed.D @jamaalbowmanny ·
12h

I'm so proud to be endorsing @Brandon4Chicago! He's going to be the leader Chicago needs for this moment and I was so honored to be with him this weekend. Let's go!

Reply on Twitter 1637501952731873281 Retweet on Twitter 1637501952731873281 75 Like on Twitter 1637501952731873281 438 Twitter 1637501952731873281
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
wjk1971 Wendy Katten @wjk1971 ·
13h

Paul Vallas stole people’s schools which means their community. Listen to parents from NOLA and Philly tonight. He did this bc he believes corp interests prevail. And there’s good $ in that. Chicago will be 💯 better with @Brandon4Chicago. 😊

Reply on Twitter 1637481994564108288 Retweet on Twitter 1637481994564108288 11 Like on Twitter 1637481994564108288 28 Twitter 1637481994564108288
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
hanna_hurley Hanna Hurley @hanna_hurley ·
2h

@SlenderSherbet @deutsch29blog …..just like a mandatory Reading Program for Pre-K.
If kids struggle, refer for remedial services?
Label kids ‘Not Ready for K’?
Rigor will overcome everything?
We’re just not aiming high enough?
We’re not challenging children enough?
Why not pre-k Calculus class?
👅: cheek?

Reply on Twitter 1637643018223099905 Retweet on Twitter 1637643018223099905 1 Like on Twitter 1637643018223099905 Twitter 1637643018223099905
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.