• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Do You Want a Small Class Size For Your Child OR a Good Teacher? The Bogus Dilemma

February 27, 2014 By Nancy Bailey 2 Comments

It is well established that lowering class size, especially for K-3, can have a positive effect on students. The argument being made around the country, and illustrated well last night on Nashville’s Fox 17 news, is, do you want a small class size, or do you want a quality teacher?

In How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic, Madsen Pirie discusses the bogus dilemma, where no matter which choice you make you wind up with a  consequence.

Should small class size or a quality teacher be a choice parents should have to make?

It is even more unusual to suggest raising class size at the same time teachers are supposed to teach everyone the same controversial Common Core State Standards. How does any teacher differentiate instruction with a huge class size and a wide range of intellectual, cultural and social levels?

The FOX report last night centered on this outrageous debate. Governor Haslam seemed to be behind the scene, knowing perfectly well that the people of Tennessee have already rejected his idea to raise class size. It’s especially tough for the Governor to make this argument too, because the Tennessee STAR Study, some of the best educational research ever, took place in his backyard.

The STAR Study, done in the late ‘80s, found that reducing a K-3 class size from 23 to 15, results in students who perform better than students in regular sized classes. And the benefits persist as the child moves into later grades.

It is tough to argue with research like that, so the Gov. has to put a different spin on it. Either you get a quality teacher and a large class size, or you get a small class and a bad teacher. A lot of other governors and reformers, including Bill Gates, Arne Duncan and various reporters make this argument. They see class size reduction as costly. But don’t be fooled! They also see credentialed, experienced teachers as costly too. So beware of their argument.

If this isn’t odd enough and most disgraceful, the news feature last night used the example of a KIPP charter school as a school that, of course, scores high and apparently does it with high class sizes and what they define as quality teachers—which of course will include the fast-trackers for cheap pay.

But don’t forget—KIPP, unlike real public schools, gets more money per student, and can dismiss troublesome students, or students whose parents are not involved. They also are known for not taking on special ed. students. They are not well-equipped to do so.

Knowing all this, I still wonder why charter schools are called public schools and are compared to true public schools that must serve everybody. Oh yes…charter schools do get public money.

They are also stricter than ever with students—most of whom have no really bad behavior problems. KIPP is proud of their stern reputation. And did I mention they have high teacher turnover?

Including KIPP in the class size, quality teacher argument is unfair and disingenuous.

Public schools must take everyone, and class sizes do matter as we learned a long time ago with the STAR Study. It was briefly mentioned on the Fox channel, but then dismissed with the phony either or argument. It should be more front-and-center in this debate—which isn’t really a debate that should have to be made. We should have addressed class size better back in the ‘90s when the study was fresh.

The school reformers have never wanted to lower class sizes because they know that it is what parents want and it works. To have something that works in real public schools would mean you wouldn’t be able to shutter public schools and turn them into KIPPs.

Lowering class size works especially in K-3. In fact, if money is really the issue, instead of lowering class sizes across the board, in every class, at every grade level, the prudent thing to do would be to lower class sizes in just K-3. Give young children a great start with fully qualified teachers who can really get to know them and their unique learning difficulties.

For late elementary, middle and high school, I can see a good school instructional designer working to determine which classes could be larger, which smaller. It would just take some forethought and a little work at individual schools to determine student needs and scheduling.

It wouldn’t have to even cost much. Good principals and guidance counselors, and teachers, could figure it out. Why isn’t this approach tried? To me, that would be real reform—true innovation.

So beware of trick questions like this. Gov. Haslam, like a lot of Governors, wants large class sizes. He approached the people of Tennessee with the raising class size issue a while back and there were no takers. So now he is presenting them with a bogus argument.

There is no one-or-the-other. Children need small class sizes in K-3, reasonable class sizes in middle and high school, and good teachers. They would also benefit from some good politicians and policy makers.

One of the best websites on class size, Class Size Matters, is here. Check it out.

Filed Under: Teaching Tagged With: class size, K-3, STAR Study, teacher quality

Comments

  1. Charlotte Vrooman says

    February 27, 2014 at 6:11 pm

    Reminds me of the old “gotcha”, “Have you stopped beating your wife/child yet?”

    Reply
  2. Nancy Bailey says

    February 28, 2014 at 8:35 am

    Thank you, Charlotte. This argument about class size vs. a good teacher makes no sense. Thanks also for the Tweets!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

Nancy E. Bailey
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
EricCeresaEric Ceresa@EricCeresa·
17h

@clay_mcch @NancyEBailey1 This is an excellent argument for raising teachers' pay, not any sort of argument against a $15 min wage. And raising the min wage DOES raise wages for workers near the minimum. We just don't usually think about the fact that teachers fit that definition.

Reply on Twitter 1350263323212787712Retweet on Twitter 13502633232127877121Like on Twitter 13502633232127877122Twitter 1350263323212787712
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
tulticanThomas Ultican@tultican·
17h

Charter Schools Are Killing Saint Louis Public. The City Is Nailing The Coffin Shut. by Lexi Perez Lane https://link.medium.com/8taMmwG44cb

Reply on Twitter 1350253072686018562Retweet on Twitter 13502530726860185621Like on Twitter 13502530726860185621Twitter 1350253072686018562
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
clay_mcchClay McChristian@clay_mcch·
15 Jan

So Biden’s $15 minimum wage comes out to $31,200 a year for a 40 hour work week. The starting salary for a beginning teacher in Texas is $33,660. So a person working a minimum wage job will be making almost the same as a teacher with a college degree. Does this make any sense? 🤷‍♂️

Reply on Twitter 1349914993114886146Retweet on Twitter 134991499311488614612298Like on Twitter 134991499311488614668928Twitter 1349914993114886146
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
chicagospedpacChicago SpedPac@chicagospedpac·
20h

.@ChiPubSchools can you tell us how many specIal educators were forced to resign this week due to your policy of not accommodating remote instruction? Break it down by SpEd teachers, SECAs and clinicians

Reply on Twitter 1350211361498927110Retweet on Twitter 135021136149892711019Like on Twitter 135021136149892711081Twitter 1350211361498927110
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
susanohaSusan Ohanian@susanoha·
23h

The authors consider the ways in which educational responses to COVID19 exemplify opportunistic disaster
capitalism.
Disaster Capitalism, Rampant EdTech
Opportunism, and the Advancement of
Online Learning in the Era of COVID19
https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/issue/current

Reply on Twitter 1350167077487861761Retweet on Twitter 13501670774878617611Like on Twitter 1350167077487861761Twitter 1350167077487861761
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 Digital Learning dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading Reading Instruction recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2021 Nancy E. Bailey · Web Design by HNH Marketing.