• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Discipline
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

H.S. Future Teachers Being Prepped for Common Core and Competency-Based Education

February 22, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 2 Comments

We hear we have a serious problem finding teachers for America’s classrooms. One solution is to encourage students in high school to become career teachers.

Young people are full of vibrant ideas and high school should be considered a valuable place for teacher recruitment. I am not saying we should push students to be teachers, but high schools have long used clubs and after-school activities to help young people understand the kinds of careers that are available.

But the new process to do this appears corrupted. It leads to Common Core and digital instruction.

As a high school student in the ‘60s, I participated in Future Teachers of America. I shadowed teachers, corrected papers, and worked with children. The club was sponsored by teachers at my school. FTA is still around. It is updated, though it looks somewhat like what I remember.

But there is another organization called Educators Rising. If you visit this website, the program, by the sound of the students describing their experiences, sounds great–at first.

But probing through the links one finds a very different approach to encouraging young people to choose teaching as a career. The focus is on Common Core and digital learning, or Competency-Based Education. Students learn about teaching through the EdRising Virtual Campus.

The program includes all kinds of outside reform groups.

The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards is involved, as is the Relay Graduate School of Education. Relay is sweeping the country–invading Colleges of Education and school districts with standardized online programming.

The Council of Chief State School Officers are there. Also worrisome is that Doug Lemov’s Teach Like a Champion is cited as a resource. Many of us consider this harsh instruction.

Bloomboard for Schools is there for privatized professional development from The New Teacher Center, TNTP, and Relay.

A high school student can learn how to handle smart phones and tablets in the classroom, and they can ponder whether phones will someday take over education.

But why would anyone want to go to the trouble of becoming a teacher if a phone will someday replace them?

#Love2Learn is another group listed which I find mysterious. There are several groups of that name. Is it homeschooling?

High school students in Educators Rising partner with Digital Promise which involves Micro-Credentialing and getting badges. This involves six categories.

  • Master core content
  • Think critically and solve complex problems.
  • Work collaboratively
  • Communicate effectively
  • Learn how to learn
  • Develop academic mindsets

But there is a whole list of focus areas. There is much discussion about aligning standards to the curriculum and management–much less talk about children and their development.

Here is there Micro-Credentials Infographic given on their site:

Educators Rising prepares young people interested in teaching for Deeper Learning. “Deeper Learning” is an umbrella term for the skills, understandings, and mindsets students must possess to succeed in today’s jobs and civic life. At its heart, Deeper Learning is defined by a set of competencies students must master to develop a keen understanding of academic content and apply their skills to challenges in the classroom, on the job, and in everyday life.

Certainly, times have changed since the ‘60s and of course teaching involving technology is important to understand. But where does the child fit in this standardized skill-driven agenda?

Educators rising is aligned to the corporate reforms facing schools today which is–as we have been watching and learning from those like Emily Talmage in Maine–a digital instruction takeover. They don’t call it the Digital Promise for nothing!

And now it has reached young high school students who are forming their ideas as to what teaching means. Many of these students are bright and would make wonderful teachers, but they are being led down the wrong road by people who aren’t real educators.

My experience in high school dealt with real children and teachers. It gave me a deep abiding love for the teaching profession. But I don’t think I would have ever gone into teaching if I’d had micro-skills to learn, or if it was all about setting a child up to work online.

Nor do I think any of this is really about teaching as much as it is about facilitating students to do Common Core State Standards and total online instruction.

I find it hard to believe micro-credentialing will drive young people into teaching, and my fear is that there will continue to be a teacher shortage–if indeed there truly is one.

Pushing for a digital takeover of brick-and-mortar schools with facilitators instead of teachers seems to be the end goal. What real instructional innovations will be lost in this unproven process?

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Badges, Bloomboard for Schools, Competency-Based Education, Digital Promise, Educators Rising, FTA, Future Teaches of America, Love2Learn, Micro-Credentialing, Relay Graduate School of Education, TNTP

Comments

  1. Máté Wierdl says

    February 22, 2016 at 1:37 pm

    What a fraud. How can this be legal? Isn’t there some kind of law preventing people to use the word “education” to describe their program?

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      February 22, 2016 at 2:16 pm

      I guess not Máté. I actually find this issue and the overriding CBE goal quite alarming. It lacks focus on the child and their development as you well know.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Máté Wierdl Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools? Buy today and use coupon code "RLEGEN19" to save 20%!

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong. Buy today and use coupon code "RLEGEN19" to save 20%!

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core Digital Learning disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities parents Personalized Learning phonics play poverty preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2019 Nancy E. Bailey · Web Design by HNH Marketing.