• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Where Art Thou Recess? CASEL’s Social-Emotional Omission

August 31, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 4 Comments

Post Views: 140

The Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) is creating behavioral standards for preschool through high school across the country. Social and emotional learning (SEL) is both trendy, and controversial, and is being reported a lot in education news.

As I have written before, I am suspect of behavioral standards for children, but some of the issues CASEL notes, bullying for example, are worthy of consideration, and some programs they review have activities that might be helpful to children.

However, no mention on the CASEL website do I see advocating for the reinstatement of recess in public schools. When it comes to social-emotional behavior in children, this is a serious omission. It raises questions as to what CASEL is really all about.

Are schools that get grants for social-emotional learning providing their students with recess? Is recess a state requirement for such money?

CASEL does discuss “embedding” SEL skills into recess.

But they are embroiled with establishing cookie-cutter standards referring to:

  • Self awareness
  • Self management
  • Social awareness
  • Relationship skills
  • Responsible decision-making

They refer to “promoting recess,” but they don’t seem to recognize that many schools still don’t offer recess. And by embedding skills, they seem to be structuring recess to teach skills.

Recess should be unstructured play.

CASEL tweeted an article about Austin ISD’s consideration of 30 minutes of daily recess. Austin schools did approve recess. The researchers must know that getting recess for children in schools is still a struggle. But why don’t they highlight it as a necessity?

Shouldn’t they be leading the charge that children deserve natural breaks during the school routine? Shouldn’t the need for recess be a big part of what CASEL is about when it comes to social-emotional learning?

CASEL emphasizes “evidence-based instruction” for SEL learning. Isn’t recess evidence-based? Haven’t there been enough studies to demonstrate its importance to children?

Here’s my favorite recommendation from The American Academy of Pediatrics.

Most parents realize the importance of recess as evidenced by Maria Guido’s slamming of pedal desks for young children. Guido’s post had 282.2K Facebook likes.

And parents around the country have organized in recent years to demand recess, like Recess for All Florida Students led by Heather Mellet. Students there are to get 20 minutes of recess (many believe 30 minutes is better).

The seriousness of the loss of recess has been documented for years. Susan Ohanian wrote about it in What Happened to Recess and Why Are Our Children Struggling in Kindergarten? (2002).

For the serious CASEL researchers, I guess recess doesn’t match the step-by step instructions meant to teach social and emotional competencies across the five core competency clusters-on age appropriate topics such as labeling feelings, coping with anxiety or stress, setting and achieving goals, developing empathy and compassion, communicating effectively, resolving conflict, being assertive, and making responsible decisions. 

Whew! That seems like a lot of lessons for a five year old, even an older student, but if you look closely at those skills, you will find every single one found on the playground! Children might demonstrate all of these behaviors during recess.

Teachers don’t need to be told such skills are embedded in play. This doesn’t call for fancy standards. How to evaluate behavior on the playground might be of some help.

But good teachers who carefully observe children during recess, know when to stand back and observe, and when to intervene. Children learn to relate. They unwind. They learn on their own to get along. It is as simple as that.

_______________________

If you want to learn new insight about how we came to this point of losing our public schools, check out my new book.

Or, the older one. HERE.

 

 

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: American Academy of Pediatrics, Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL), Evidenced-Based, play, recess, Unstructured Play

Comments

  1. Paul Chavez says

    September 1, 2016 at 6:48 pm

    Get this, my school has only one 15 minute recess per day, right before lunch. For this “recess” students are to pick 1 of 4 structured activities (maybe 5). They are tether-ball, 4-square, wall-ball and swings . They are not allowed to switch activity the entire, short recess! I could not imagine this happening in a white suburban schools or in our “elite” Denver Public Schools with affluent parents. No room for imaginary play, invented games, tag or just running from friend to friend! These children of color are denied a chance for creative plat and problem solving skill development! Is this crap happening in other states and schools districts?

    Loading...
    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      September 2, 2016 at 7:41 am

      How sad, Paul. Sounds more like a short P.E. class. Unfortunately, yes. This is happening in many communities. While it is worse for poor children, who also get the inhumane classes that are test and punish, recess has been missing in a lot of wealthier suburban schools too. Thank you for sharing.

      Loading...
      Reply
  2. Rachel Rich says

    May 26, 2017 at 10:31 am

    That’s quite an oversight. I wonder if they only believe in the data they accumulate. These closed systems seem seem to be the trend, like for Smarter Balanced and PARCC decide what to assess, assess it and then declare themselves a success.

    Loading...
    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      May 26, 2017 at 11:11 am

      That’s a good summation. Thanks, Rachel.

      Loading...
      Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools Children class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public education public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform science of reading Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2025 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.

%d