• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Donald Trump’s Love of School Choice

July 22, 2016 By Nancy Bailey Leave a Comment

Post Views: 90

It is no secret that when it comes to public schools and other facets of American life, many Republicans do not like the federal government. Donald Trump used to speak of local control of schools. This is very much the old Republican Party talking.

But last night, Donald Trump cheered school choice. He no longer mentions local control. I think he may now realize that school choice is the opposite of local control of schools. 

And the other night, Donald Trump, Jr. sniped at teachers and public schools and spouted the weary argument that America needs choice when it comes to public schools. Somewhere in that speech he praised vouchers in other countries. He failed to do his research. Here are the “disastrous” results in Sweden.

Local control is also an area that many value when it comes to the traditional idea of community schools. Many Democrats support community schools.

But local control and school choice don’t work together and you see this fight playing out in communities across the country.

With school choice, private companies run schools and parents may get to pick their school, but they will not likely have control of what that school does. They will have to follow the rules of the school. They give up local control.

Democrats don’t like school choice, but they do embrace charter schools. There is not much difference between the two. Charters run by non-profit or for-profit management operations do not usually follow the local concerns of the community either. They run by their own rules.

Yet, who is better to embrace the local needs of school children than parents, teachers, and the community? Who is more worthy to hammer out curriculum and instructional needs—to pull families and children together?

Just think about what is lost without local control—or what is gained. Shouldn’t those who pay taxes have some say in how their public schools are run?

In recent years, however, even local school boards have been corrupted by outside groups who come into a school district to create havoc. The nonprofit Stand for Children comes to mind. Many from Stand don’t even have children who attend public schools. They are a group that is all about the privatization of public schooling.

It is the old fashioned idea of a local school board governed by the people that this country should fight for.

The problem is that Trump, and many Republicans, support school choice—vouchers.

Vouchers, like charter schools, often “skim” or “cream” to get the brightest students. And because the school will be about making a profit, children will likely get lower quality teachers and programs.

For example, most Republicans hate Common Core State Standards, however, if they look around they will see that CCSS is supported by those who love other school reforms—like charter schools and school choice.

And while Trump Jr. slammed teachers, many teachers despise CCSS too. A lot of teachers have left their teaching positions because of it. It is the school choice advocates—the charter school lovers—who are on board for Common Core.

If Americans go the choice route they will most likely get a glut of ineffectual charters. We already see this occurring with charter schools.

We see charter school scandals around the country. Americans may like the idea of choice, but they must understand they will lose all local control of their schools in the process. I think that’s a very big loss.

 

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: charter schools, Democratic Party, Donald Trump, Local Control of Schools, Republican Party, School Boards, School Choice, Stand for Children, vouchers

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools Children class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public education public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform science of reading Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2025 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.

%d