• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Butterfly in the Sky? Educational Programs for Children

June 1, 2014 By Nancy Bailey Leave a Comment

Post Views: 20

There has been a lot of buzz over Levar Burton’s Kickstarter campaign, here, to bring Reading Rainbow back as an app. Sorry for you folks who don’t have access to Netflix Streaming, iPad, iPhones, Xbox, or computer internet TV.

There will be no butterfly in the sky returning to PBS. If you are lucky, and to Burton’s credit (it is his goal), Reading Rainbow will find its way into schools.

I hope the Common Core police don’t derail it. I’m serious. It may be that Reading Rainbow books aren’t totally aligned….

It is too bad they don’t bring the program back to TV. I imagine poorer children will miss out on it at home, where I think Reading Rainbow really meant something.

Children loved Reading Rainbow and many were inspired to read the books the show recommended. The show also got a lot of awards. A Reading Rainbow stamp of approval helped parents choose books too.

Burton is doing a good thing for kids and there is no doubt he is passionate about it. I do have to wonder. With so many folks wanting to see this happen, he got $1 million in an hour (now about $3 million), it’s difficult to understand why they ever took Reading Rainbow off PBS in the first place.

TV programming for children is about education more than ever before. This intent started with Sesame Street which introduced a new, joyful and creative focus on learning, with the added intent to help poor children of preschool age.

But all little children (and their parents) loved it, and rightfully so. Good TV programming is good TV programming.

Just like all children deserve access to good schools. Schools don’t have to be stricter for poor children, or different, just because children are poor.

The same goes for TV programming. If it is quality entertainment, children will love it.

There have been other quality shows too. Who can forget Captain Kangaroo? And for a long time PBS, Nickelodeon (Blues Clues)  and even Disney (Under the Umbrella Tree) had excellent quality programming.

It just doesn’t seem to be as good as it used to be. Some attribute it to technology and more choices.

Of course not all shows are about learning. Some are just for fun…like SpongeBob. I get that. It’s O.K. to watch programs just for laughs. Children and adults need that.

But if it is mostly about education, why do the programs seem to be going downhill? Are they more cheaply made?

I have checked into PBS Kids and I don’t like much of what I see. They still have some of the old mainstays like Arthur and Sesame Street, but instead of Reading Rainbow and other reading rich programs like Wishbone, the dog who dreamt he was characters in novels (even Sancho Panza in Don Quixote!), some of their programs, I’m thinking here mostly of Super Why! for preschoolers, seem forced and pushy on words and sounds for young children to learn. Too preachy!

How will those programs teach, be enjoyed and remembered as compared to say Sesame Street’s The Pasta Song? Cannelloni anyone?

I miss the likes of Miss Frizzle and Bill Nye the Science Guy which never seemed to speak down to children.

Some of the shows today are not very subtle. Yet, subtlety is everything in children’s programming.

Many of them are also loud and frenetic…not in any good way.

I don’t want to be critical of various programs, because surely I will insult someone. I don’t want a debate. I just ask that you pay close attention to some of these programs and compare them to some of the old programs and question whether we now have quality programming.

And ask whether the programs offered today have a different kind of objective and are too strictly aligned to school standards.

It is too bad really, especially for the poor, who may not have access to the older programs.

So bring back Reading Rainbow for those who can pay for it and hopefully get it into the schools.

I have pulled out some of my favorite programs of old. Most teach skills and/or how to get along.  If you have access, and if they are out there on YouTube, or you can find reruns, I highly recommend them.

If you share with me your favorites I will also try to include them.

Lambchop’s Play Along

SHARI LEWIS

Wishbone

wishbone

The Magic School Bus

Miss Frizzles

Bill Nye the Science Guy

bill nye the science guy

Under the Umbrella Tree

under the umbrella

The Puzzle Place

the puzzle place

Thomas the Tank Engine (the older version)

thomas

Maurice Sendak’s Little Bear

Little Bear

Franklin the Turtle

franklin

Captain Kangaroo

captain kangaroo

Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood

mr. ro

Blue’s Clues

blues

Zoom

zoom

Mr. Wizard

wizard

Doug

doug

Reading Rainbow

reading

Between the Lions (suggested)

Lions

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: books, Common Core Alignment, Reading Rainbow, Stories, TV programming

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
20h

Things to ponder about the current discussions around SOR. From ChatGPT @ChatwithGPT
https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/?fbclid=IwAR0Fhkczq46nJq8n5ob1q2xF5Q9aFc9ya04TEgYCaVTyEElEQg_UbWfoROY

Reply on Twitter 1637853806833590275 Retweet on Twitter 1637853806833590275 8 Like on Twitter 1637853806833590275 25 Twitter 1637853806833590275
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
19 Mar

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 18 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 46 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
deguire_mike Mike DeGuire, Ph. D. @deguire_mike ·
13h

"The privatization movement has been strategically designed...by billionaires and their fellow investors for specific purposes: to lower their own tax burden, and ideologically to dismantle public education." @NPEaction @NancyEBailey1 @TheAndySpears
https://medium.com/@jfiske80/billionaires-and-their-investors-are-impacting-education-policies-in-colorado-and-especially-in-c523579674af

Reply on Twitter 1637957759751831558 Retweet on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Like on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Twitter 1637957759751831558
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nepctweet NEPC @nepctweet ·
19h

"Let’s honor our students by providing them free quality democratic public schools that reject no one." @NancyEBailey1 https://bit.ly/3FE0KFA

Reply on Twitter 1637870110840094721 Retweet on Twitter 1637870110840094721 3 Like on Twitter 1637870110840094721 2 Twitter 1637870110840094721
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
dianeravitch Diane Ravitch 🇺🇸🇺🇦🌈 @dianeravitch ·
18 Mar

Voucher schools don’t have to comply with IDEA for kids with disabilities. They are allowed to discriminate for any reason or none at all. #schoolschoose https://twitter.com/KatieLikesBikes/status/1636446553429647376

Katie 🌻 @KatieLikesBikes

@Forrest4Trees @GregAbbott_TX No one is reporting that private schools don't have to adhere to the Federal IDEA act. Kids with #disabilities will be further harmed because #publicschools provide important services to #PWD and are essentially having their budgets cut in half by the voucher system.

Reply on Twitter 1637123379458088962 Retweet on Twitter 1637123379458088962 64 Like on Twitter 1637123379458088962 178 Twitter 1637123379458088962
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.