• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Courses We Once Knew: Home Economics, Family and Jobs!

October 14, 2014 By Nancy Bailey 4 Comments

Post Views: 799

Sometimes, caught up in fighting high-stakes testing and Common Core, we might forget about other insidious ways our public schools have been changed due to harmful standards. We recognize easily the loss of the arts. And serious classes, important to a democracy, like civics, are given short shrift these days. But what about the great home economics class? Home ec goes to the heart of the family. How could it have ever been sacrificed for high-stakes standards?

How many middle and high schools offer home economics anymore? Is it a dynamic part of the curriculum or hidden in the background as a class for kids who cannot master the tough classes? School reformers have created a college or nothing campaign for years now, and classes like home ec mean nothing. Either you succeed at what they dish out or you don’t. No pun intended. And the connection between home ec and the family has all but been disregarded.

Home economics could focus on any of the following valuable topics, and it could be helpful to any student:

  • consumer education
  • institutional management
  • interior design
  • home furnishing
  • cleaning
  • handicrafts
  • sewing
  • clothing and textiles
  • cooking
  • nutrition
  • food preservation
  • hygiene
  • child development
  • managing money
  • family relationships
  • fire prevention
  • safety procedures

Some of these might be blended into math or health classes, like learning how to manage money. But they belong really to the home don’t they? Could home ec get young people to avoid debt in the future? Ruth Graham in “Bring Back Home Ec” in The Boston Globe wonders if it could even keep adult children from moving back home with their parents! The loss of home ec demonstrates how schools no longer are set up for students, but for those with a self-seeking privatization agenda.

Think about the push to get young people to eat healthier. Home ec could help with that. Instead of manipulating such a message and changing the school menus to prove a point, students should learn how to cook for themselves. Showing, instead of telling, is always better. The dirty little secret is that home ec flew out the window for other insidious corporate reasons. Peddling convenience foods, the kind that fatten you up, doesn’t work well when you are teaching kids how to cook food from scratch.

Cooking and sewing are important skills in a world that is overly focused on technology. But if you look at new sewing machines they are about as high-tech as you can get! Students would be in their element. Figuring out how to cook and sew could lead some to valuable careers.

Measuring skills dominate in home ec too. Home ec could lead to valuable careers. A while back I viewed artwork on display at a private school. There was a whole presentation on clothing design.  How interesting and valuable, providing high school students a glimpse into what it would be like to have this kind of career. But what is considered exploration in real private schools is not allowed in public schools.

All students, boys and girls, might benefit with basic skills about how to take care of themselves. How do you cook and bake a few things, especially the basics? Anything that shows students how to live a life of quality could be included in Home ec. Home ec is not some namby-pamby course. It is strong, forthright, not only sure to please, but conclusive in the skills it provides students. It is also fun. I find it interesting that the founder of home economics was Ellen Swallow Richards, from Boston, who was the first woman admitted to MIT.

Home ec professionals have been instrumental in instituting the 1994 International Year of the Family, and they have worked closely with UNICEF and other UN programs. Home ec lobbyists have also been behind many efforts to fight poverty, gender inequality and social injustice. They support sustainable development and even act as consultants to businesses in regard to consumer services. But mostly, home economics is about enriching family life. When home ec was in its prime, it included boys. From what I observed in the middle school where I worked, they thoroughly enjoyed this class!

Those who have destroyed a well-rounded curriculum for students, in this case home economics did much harm. These classes solidified our kids, treating them like real people—making their education whole. School reformers, by ditching such classes, went to the heart of the family. Focusing solely on math and reading, and blending a little of other stuff into the mix, has stymied our children…leaving them empty shells who know little about the world around them and life’s joys.

Home economics was a course we once knew. So sorry our children today are missing out.

 

 

Additional Citation

Home Economics. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_economics.

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: High-Stakes Standards, Home Economics, privatization

Comments

  1. Momoffive says

    October 15, 2014 at 8:50 am

    Home economics classes need to be brought back to middle and high schools. Learning to cook and sew are skills I still use on a daily basis. These classes helped me grow as a person far more than the Algebra 2 class I struggled through. The skills gained by reading a complex sewing pattern or planning a nutritious family meal will last a lifetime, and yet schools have gotten rid of them. Public and private schools seem to focus on high test scores, so I took a different course for my 2nd and 6th grader this year–homeschooling. We love it! Every Tuesday is “home-ec” day and we cook, sew and crochet. The girls also learn how to make a bed, organize a shelf, vacuum, and keep a checkbook. All kids should have this opportunity…bring home economics back!

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      October 15, 2014 at 10:19 am

      Thanks for your comment, Momoffive. Someone tweeted me that Home ec is taught within other subjects, and while that might be true for health and managing money, I don’t think most schools address home ec skills. So, of course, I agree with you!

      Reply
  2. Meg N. says

    October 15, 2014 at 2:05 pm

    Thank you for posting this Nancy!! The sad thing about the loss of these classes is the kids it affects the most, those living in poverty. These kids are often responsible for the care of younger siblings as well as themselves as parents work 2 or 3 jobs to survive. They are often responsible for the cooking and cleaning in the home. They often care for sick younger siblings. Some are even pushed to work in order to help provide for the family. These classes are true lifelines for these kids. I have seen a push to replace these classes with things like medical studies and other classes that may be interesting but don’t provide the practical learning these kids need!

    Reply
  3. Nancy Bailey says

    October 15, 2014 at 7:07 pm

    Thank you, Meg. That is an excellent point! So many practical skills could be covered for all students and help disadvantaged kids especially for the reasons you note. It isn’t all about going to college.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
beebryhte Belinda Whyte @beebryhte ·
8h

https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/26/the-science-of-reading-and-the-rejection-of-picture-books/
Not sure I could agree more...thanks @NancyEBailey1

Reply on Twitter 1640122924026978304 Retweet on Twitter 1640122924026978304 3 Like on Twitter 1640122924026978304 5 Twitter 1640122924026978304
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
1 Mar

Unstructured play has been driven out of early childhood classrooms for years! Goals are to micromanage everything a child does. Few seem to connect play's importance to learning & mental health, or they don't care if schools fail. https://twitter.com/Cabal_Educator/status/1630938079170109440

Kimberly Blodgett @Cabal_Educator

Let them play!

Reply on Twitter 1630961018854621185 Retweet on Twitter 1630961018854621185 8 Like on Twitter 1630961018854621185 14 Twitter 1630961018854621185
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
9h

Science of Reading camp never discusses the importance of picture books. How much time do children get to explore them? How often are they read to for enjoyment? This is worrisome. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/26/the-science-of-reading-and-the-rejection-of-picture-books/

Reply on Twitter 1640105213276180480 Retweet on Twitter 1640105213276180480 11 Like on Twitter 1640105213276180480 42 Twitter 1640105213276180480
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
25 Mar

@BetsyDeVos So much research shows that 3rd gr retention is bad for students it's hard to believe you think this is fine. There are many alternatives. https://nancyebailey.com/2017/10/09/force-flunk-destroying-a-childs-love-of-reading-and-their-life/

Reply on Twitter 1639663340321492995 Retweet on Twitter 1639663340321492995 3 Like on Twitter 1639663340321492995 16 Twitter 1639663340321492995
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
jerseyjazzman Jersey Jazzman (Official... no, really) @jerseyjazzman ·
25 Mar

We "get to know where the money is being spent"? Great! So every private school receiving tax dollars will have to open their books and be subject to the same standards of financial transparency as public schools, right? Right?

(Is this thing on?) https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1639291755479613441

House Republicans @HouseGOP

"Today was a win for every mother, every father, but most importantly, for every student in America. You have a Parents Bill of Rights now." - @SpeakerMcCarthy

Reply on Twitter 1639629781057560581 Retweet on Twitter 1639629781057560581 16 Like on Twitter 1639629781057560581 60 Twitter 1639629781057560581
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.