• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

How REAL Community Schools Differ from Charters Who Adopt that Label

July 22, 2015 By Nancy Bailey 3 Comments

By Mark Naison

Community Schools are public schools with wrap around services that become places where all residents of low income communities can find spaces where they can learn, organize and find a voice. The concept was once at the forefront of social justice organizing in the 1980’s and 1990’s, but was pushed aside for a vision of test based accountability from the top down in which all schools must promote mastery of a common curriculum. Bringing back the original ideal of Community schools, along with curricula which incorporate community traditions and cultures, is one of the best responses public school advocates can make to the Corporate sponsored charter school offensive.

What complicates this effort is that those promoting charter schools, now that charters have lost their luster due to fiscal improprieties and academic abuses, are starting to call corporate charters “Community schools” This is taking place in Memphis, and is also occurring in Youngstown, where state education officials propose to charterize the entire district.

The only way to challenge this effort and prevent Corporate reformers from hijacking and derailing the Community schools movement, is to spell out the differences between public community schools and charters which take some elements of the community school concept and reject others.

Here are some of the key features of Community schools as developed over the last fifty years.

  1. Democratic participation and control. The school is a place where all community members are welcome and access services, take classes and hold meetings, not just families of children at the school.. Charters almost NEVER do that. They separate families in the school community from those in the larger community.
  2. Culturally appropriate curricula and school culture. Community schools draw on the cultural traditions of the people in the communities where they are located and incorporate them into the school culture and pedagogy. They refuse to sacrifice those traditions to achieve high test scores. Some community schools ask for exemption from state testing so they can better created a culturally relevant curriculum. By contrast, most charters are obsessed with student test scores and turn instruction into test prep.
  3. Disciplinary policies and instruction which are infused respect for students and teachers. Community schools arose in part, because traditional public schools often showed insensitivity to students of color and disciplined them disproportionately. Their philosophy was to work with students when they become challenging, not expel or suspend them, and ultimately transform their rebelliousness into an asset. Most charters do exactly the opposite. They expel non-conforming students in enormous numbers, sending them back into the public school system. This may be the single largest difference between real community schools and charters adopting the label.
  4. Respect for teachers and recruitment of lifetime educators who will live in the communities they teach in. The community school movement was forged by educators and activists who wanted teachers to be sensitive to the cultural traditions of the students they taught and part of the communities the schools are located in. They actively recruited teachers of color and encouraged teachers to live in the communities they taught in. Most charters do the opposite. They prefer having revolving door staffs of young white teachers who can be easily intimidated by administrators and will accept the abusive disciplinary policies and regimes of test prep they promote.

If you look at these four criteria, you will see that most charter schools which call themselves Community schools fail to respect the original vision. Community schools were not just intended to be institutions which provide wrap around services; they were intended to be centers of democratic education and community empowerment.

Those are the kinds of schools we need. Those are the kind of schools we still must fight for.

Mark Naison is Professor of African American Studies and History at Fordham University.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: charter schools, Community Schools

Comments

  1. Mary Porter says

    September 10, 2017 at 6:52 am

    The real difference is that these “Community Schools” are merging into a network of “neighborhood centers”, with non-profit fronts. They are ready to suck all the medical and housing resources out of the community, as well as the schools.
    https://sites.ed.gov/fbnp/

    Reply
  2. Mary Porter says

    September 10, 2017 at 7:06 am

    This isn’t just spin, it’s a move to unite financial control of publicly funded education, health and housing services that has been in the works for the past 8 years.
    https://www.bakerripley.org/locations#school_site

    Reply
  3. Lyn H says

    January 16, 2018 at 2:19 pm

    Every bit of this is correct. And those 4 features are essential. Thanks Nancy and Mark.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

Nancy E. Bailey
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
tulticanThomas Ultican@tultican·
25 Feb

Is EdTrust Behind High-Stakes Testing During This Pandemic? - Is acting Ed Secretary Ian Rosenblum
signaling Race to the Top 2 or will the genuine public education people in the department exert a positive influence? https://go.shr.lc/2ZNPjGh via @shareaholic

Reply on Twitter 1365080070239309824Retweet on Twitter 13650800702393098243Like on Twitter 13650800702393098243Twitter 1365080070239309824
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
tulticanThomas Ultican@tultican·
26 Feb

Nancy Bailey: Is EdTrust Behind the Renewal of Standardized Testing? https://dianeravitch.net/2021/02/26/nancy-bailey-is-edtrust-behind-the-renewal-of-standardized-testing/ via @dianeravitch

Reply on Twitter 1365399285039206401Retweet on Twitter 13653992850392064011Like on Twitter 13653992850392064011Twitter 1365399285039206401
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
hanna_hurleyHanna Hurley@hanna_hurley·
25 Feb

Is EdTrust Behind High-Stakes Testing During This Pandemic?
The Pandemic is like hitting the Mega-MILLION for CorpProfiteer$......⁦@EdTrust⁩ ⁦@BillGates⁩ ⁦@melindagates⁩ CHARTER SCHOOL$ & their many private CON$ULTANT$!
⁦@FLOTUS⁩ https://nancyebailey.com/2021/02/25/is-edtrust-behind-high-stakes-testing-during-this-pandemic/

Reply on Twitter 1365005322419593224Retweet on Twitter 13650053224195932241Like on Twitter 1365005322419593224Twitter 1365005322419593224
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
coopmike48Coopmike48@coopmike48·
26 Feb

Nancy Bailey: Is EdTrust Behind the Renewal of Standardized Testing? | Diane Ravitch's blog - https://wp.me/p2odLa-tEX via @dianeravitch

Reply on Twitter 1365360664420646912Retweet on Twitter 13653606644206469126Like on Twitter 13653606644206469123Twitter 1365360664420646912
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
skrashenStephen Krashen@skrashen·
26 Feb

@hueraTN @NancyEBailey1 YES! Martin Luther King:
"We are likely to find that the problems of housing and education, instead of preceding the elimination of poverty, will themselves be affected if poverty is first abolished.”

Reply on Twitter 1365108351529443328Retweet on Twitter 13651083515294433281Like on Twitter 13651083515294433281Twitter 1365108351529443328
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 Digital Learning dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading Reading Instruction recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2021 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.