• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

How REAL Community Schools Differ from Charters Who Adopt that Label

July 22, 2015 By Nancy Bailey 3 Comments

Post Views: 130

By Mark Naison

Community Schools are public schools with wrap around services that become places where all residents of low income communities can find spaces where they can learn, organize and find a voice. The concept was once at the forefront of social justice organizing in the 1980’s and 1990’s, but was pushed aside for a vision of test based accountability from the top down in which all schools must promote mastery of a common curriculum. Bringing back the original ideal of Community schools, along with curricula which incorporate community traditions and cultures, is one of the best responses public school advocates can make to the Corporate sponsored charter school offensive.

What complicates this effort is that those promoting charter schools, now that charters have lost their luster due to fiscal improprieties and academic abuses, are starting to call corporate charters “Community schools” This is taking place in Memphis, and is also occurring in Youngstown, where state education officials propose to charterize the entire district.

The only way to challenge this effort and prevent Corporate reformers from hijacking and derailing the Community schools movement, is to spell out the differences between public community schools and charters which take some elements of the community school concept and reject others.

Here are some of the key features of Community schools as developed over the last fifty years.

  1. Democratic participation and control. The school is a place where all community members are welcome and access services, take classes and hold meetings, not just families of children at the school.. Charters almost NEVER do that. They separate families in the school community from those in the larger community.
  2. Culturally appropriate curricula and school culture. Community schools draw on the cultural traditions of the people in the communities where they are located and incorporate them into the school culture and pedagogy. They refuse to sacrifice those traditions to achieve high test scores. Some community schools ask for exemption from state testing so they can better created a culturally relevant curriculum. By contrast, most charters are obsessed with student test scores and turn instruction into test prep.
  3. Disciplinary policies and instruction which are infused respect for students and teachers. Community schools arose in part, because traditional public schools often showed insensitivity to students of color and disciplined them disproportionately. Their philosophy was to work with students when they become challenging, not expel or suspend them, and ultimately transform their rebelliousness into an asset. Most charters do exactly the opposite. They expel non-conforming students in enormous numbers, sending them back into the public school system. This may be the single largest difference between real community schools and charters adopting the label.
  4. Respect for teachers and recruitment of lifetime educators who will live in the communities they teach in. The community school movement was forged by educators and activists who wanted teachers to be sensitive to the cultural traditions of the students they taught and part of the communities the schools are located in. They actively recruited teachers of color and encouraged teachers to live in the communities they taught in. Most charters do the opposite. They prefer having revolving door staffs of young white teachers who can be easily intimidated by administrators and will accept the abusive disciplinary policies and regimes of test prep they promote.

If you look at these four criteria, you will see that most charter schools which call themselves Community schools fail to respect the original vision. Community schools were not just intended to be institutions which provide wrap around services; they were intended to be centers of democratic education and community empowerment.

Those are the kinds of schools we need. Those are the kind of schools we still must fight for.

Mark Naison is Professor of African American Studies and History at Fordham University.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: charter schools, Community Schools

Comments

  1. Mary Porter says

    September 10, 2017 at 6:52 am

    The real difference is that these “Community Schools” are merging into a network of “neighborhood centers”, with non-profit fronts. They are ready to suck all the medical and housing resources out of the community, as well as the schools.
    https://sites.ed.gov/fbnp/

    Reply
  2. Mary Porter says

    September 10, 2017 at 7:06 am

    This isn’t just spin, it’s a move to unite financial control of publicly funded education, health and housing services that has been in the works for the past 8 years.
    https://www.bakerripley.org/locations#school_site

    Reply
  3. Lyn H says

    January 16, 2018 at 2:19 pm

    Every bit of this is correct. And those 4 features are essential. Thanks Nancy and Mark.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
plthomasedd Paul Thomas @plthomasedd ·
10h

@susanoha @NancyEBailey1 "Sell What We Do": The Manufactured Crisis to Hide the Story Being Sold https://radicalscholarship.com/2023/01/30/sell-what-we-do-the-manufactured-crisis-to-hide-the-story-being-sold/

Reply on Twitter 1620071079279722497 Retweet on Twitter 1620071079279722497 2 Like on Twitter 1620071079279722497 2 Twitter 1620071079279722497
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
drmaryhoward Dr. Mary Howard @drmaryhoward ·
29 Jan

Nancy Bailey: Reading Disabilities: Focus on Public Schools NOT School Choice!

“It’s unfair to say public school teachers fail to teach reading, while charter schools show substandard results. This creates a double standard.” @NancyEBailey1

https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619829619343106050 Retweet on Twitter 1619829619343106050 1 Like on Twitter 1619829619343106050 3 Twitter 1619829619343106050
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
29 Jan

The focus should be on lifting traditional public schools & reading programs for many students who attend those schools rather than on unproven private and charter schools. Fix IDEA by increasing options. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619827835786629120 Retweet on Twitter 1619827835786629120 2 Like on Twitter 1619827835786629120 1 Twitter 1619827835786629120
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
arizona_sos Save Our Schools AZ @arizona_sos ·
28 Jan

Special interests call ESA vouchers “scholarships” because private schools select their students. It’s not “school choice,” it’s the school’s choice 😡#AZVoucherWatch #VouchersHurt #FundOurSchools

http://bit.ly/SellingSchoolChoice

Reply on Twitter 1619455283402608640 Retweet on Twitter 1619455283402608640 72 Like on Twitter 1619455283402608640 193 Twitter 1619455283402608640
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
danwuori Dan Wuori @danwuori ·
29 Jan

On-demand standardized testing has no place in kindergarten. There are far more appropriate and meaningful methods of assessing young children. https://twitter.com/reimagschool/status/1619665302450753536

David Locke @ReimagSchool

My wife's Kindergarten students felt very stressed and were crying when they had to take a standardized test. When she reported this to administrators their solution was "test them until they cry, and then stop." #testthemtiltheycry #resisttesting

Reply on Twitter 1619667712833363968 Retweet on Twitter 1619667712833363968 35 Like on Twitter 1619667712833363968 225 Twitter 1619667712833363968
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.