• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

CBE Online is Neither Personalized Nor Higher-Order Thinking!

January 23, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 15 Comments

The issue of Competency-Based Education is very much in the news, so I thought I would revive this post.

Competency-Based Education (CBE) is being promoted as the way to “personalize” education, but it is a cold impersonal method of teaching on the computer. It fails to teach to the whole child and merely provides fragmented drill. It will be coordinated with Common Core, and there are concerns about student private information being compromised.

Competency-Based Education (CBE) itself has been around for years. Teachers pretest, or figure out what a child doesn’t know or understand. They provide instruction that addresses what the student lacks. Then the teacher reassesses to see if their instruction made a difference. If the instruction works, the teacher moves on. If it doesn’t work, they rethink their teaching strategy and do something different.

Teachers might not think about CBE much because it is usually automatic. Special education teachers used to hear about CBE quite often because it is used with IEPs.

There is nothing wrong with CBE per se, but let’s be clear. Today’s online CBE is all about sticking students on the computer to get all their instruction on basic skills. What’s new here is that the reformers want to remove the teacher from the equation.

For example, when the President said recently that there would be less testing, many believe he was in fact implying that online CBE was the way to go. Instead of one big test at the end of the year, students will get smaller tests every day…every hour…on the computer!

Tom Vander Ark reinforces what I stated in the above paragraph. Here he outlines, often confusingly, what we can expect with online CBE. Vander Ark was previously the superintendent of Federal Way Public Schools and executive director of the Gates Education Initiative and more. He has no background or degrees in education. He pontificates about education issues and especially digital learning.

There is more involved in the teaching process than skill development, and it is sad that politicians and businessmen with no understanding of children have become obsessed with this kind of instruction. It lacks imagination and destroys the socialization process that is critical in today’s world.

Consider the following areas that computers don’t address:

  • Working with other students
  • Working through disagreements (this often happens on the playground with young children)
  • Being exposed to teachers who inspire
  • Involvement in the arts
  • Physical education
  • Engagement in extra-curricular activities (sports, marching band, drama, cheerleading, etc.)
  • Pride in one’s school
  • Feeling a part of something larger than oneself
  • Learning tolerance of differences
  • Hands-on lab work in science

Students who work only on skill development online miss out on a variety of learning experiences that have been valued for generations.

Placing students on tech devices for all of their learning also only focuses on a small part of their education. Technology has its place in teaching but there is no research to indicate it is the best teacher, and certainly it doesn’t come close in doing the job of schooling for which this country has become accustomed.

There should be a vigorous debate about how CBE online and technology are being used to replace teachers and schools. This should be a topic addressed by all Presidential candidates and politicians in state and local races.

If we look back at the reforms that have been done to schools for the last thirty years, we see a trend—a push to teach just skills, and in CBE fashion, without the extras that make schooling a valued, rich learning experience for children.

We’ve seen more testing, a heavier emphasis on skills in just reading and math, high-stakes testing, similar standards for all students, and now Common Core State Standards—fewer but similar goals for every child. Basic skills are a rudimentary part of education, but focusing only on such skills leaves out the education of the whole child. This is far from personalized.

All of this has been leading us to CBE and online schooling. It’s reckless and will hurt especially those students who are not capable of teaching themselves online—which is pretty much what students are being asked to do.

It is truly impersonal that public schools are being shaped into online schooling and the American people are being duped into thinking this will provide something better for their children.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Competency-Based Education (CBE), high-stakes testing, Higher-Order Skills, Online Learning, Personalized Learning, standards, Technology, testing

Comments

  1. Diane Sekula says

    November 2, 2015 at 4:30 pm

    New Hampshire reformers like to call attention to the, “successes” that the state has seen through CBE, reformers see the state as a model. I can assure you that many parents, teachers, and students themselves are deeply dissatisfied with the system. Students are subjected to flipped classrooms, constant assessments, and endless hours of homework; they are anxious. Kids in kindergarten in the district where I live are encouraged to think about careers. (As the mother of a five year old myself, I’m content to let him play with his friends and pretend puppies, because it’s developmentally appropriate.) It’s becoming harder and harder to argue that we aren’t experiencing workforce training in lieu of classical education. I spent twelve years as a public educator, I quit last spring. I also enrolled my oldest in a parochial school I’m amazed at the content of what he is learning, the freedom he has to question, the freedom the teachers have to teach; to INSPIRE, and how much happier my son is. While I am happy for my son, I am beyond upset with the fact that what my son’s school does for its students can easily be replicated (for little money) in public schools, but isn’t. Reformers desire to, “enlighten” with their ridiculous, untested, unproven methods seem mysteriously connected to their desire to control, and earn.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      November 3, 2015 at 8:10 pm

      I am always sorry to hear of a teacher who left…but I understand. You have great insight. And I agree better instruction could take place in public schools. Best wishes.

      Reply
  2. Sheila Resseger says

    November 2, 2015 at 5:06 pm

    “competency based education” online–neither personalized nor higher-order thinking, with exponential data collection/data mining, and an unhealthy dose of wifi radiation–hard to imagine anything worse for children but better for the edtech “geniuses” who dreamed this up

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      November 3, 2015 at 8:05 pm

      Thank you, Sheila.

      Reply
  3. Linda Chantal Sullivan says

    November 2, 2015 at 8:14 pm

    I’m still having trouble wrapping my head around the two outcomes these pseudo educators (corporate shills is more like it) profess to address with CBE and high-stakes testing.: skills and/or critical thinking. You can promote both in a classroom. with the leadership of an inspiring teacher and the collaboration of a group of inquiring minds I don’t believe you can get either from a computer.. What can you get from a computer? Loneliness, boredom, discouragement, and a bunch of rote facts – way down on Bloom’s Taxonomy scale. You take the test just after having read the material, and you forget all or most of it immediately. Then, without any contemplation at all, you move to the next “skill set.” What kind of education is that? What kind of children will we raise with this kind of “education?” Who will put the information into a larger context? Will planetary and social concerns be expressed solely with the “like” button on Facebook or other social media? With their mobile devices and ear buds, they’re already self=isolated enough. I fear for them and for their future children.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      November 3, 2015 at 8:08 pm

      Thank you, Linda. It’s a strange new world. “Who will put the information into a larger context?” That’s a great question!

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Competency Based Ed- the culmination of the common core agenda. | stopcommoncorenys says:
    November 3, 2015 at 6:47 am

    […] https://nancyebailey.com/2015/11/02/cbe-online-is-neither-personalized-nor-higher-order-thinking/ […]

    Reply
  2. Will Competency-Based Learning Rescue the Testocracy? - Living in Dialogue says:
    November 3, 2015 at 12:32 pm

    […] of portfolios in this largely technology-driven vision is not enough to make it worthwhile. As Nancy Bailey points out, this vision misses so many “competencies” that cannot be measured by tests or through a […]

    Reply
  3. Selling Competency-Based Education | Parenting Tips says:
    November 19, 2015 at 7:56 am

    […] epic proportions, because it will be a cash stream and data mining opportunity of epic proportions. Pay attention. Stay […]

    Reply
  4. Selling Competency-Based Education - LiberalVoiceLiberalVoice — Your source for everything about liberals and progressives! — News and tweets about everything liberals and progressives says:
    November 19, 2015 at 7:58 am

    […] epic proportions, because it will be a cash stream and data mining opportunity of epic proportions. Pay attention. Stay […]

    Reply
  5. Required Reading on Competency Based Education (CBE) | Opt Out CNY says:
    December 8, 2015 at 10:42 am

    […] Author and special education teacher Nancy Bailey provides a good overview of CBE and how it is neither personalized nor geared toward higher order thinking HERE. […]

    Reply
  6. COMPETENCY BASED EDUCATION: Destroying Public Schools One Profitable Data Point at a Time | accountabaloney says:
    January 26, 2016 at 8:01 am

    […] https://nancyebailey.com/2016/01/23/cbe-online-is-neither-personalized-nor-higher-order-thinking/ […]

    Reply
  7. CALL TO ACTION: Stop the Poorly Designed CBE Pilot (SB1714) | accountabaloney says:
    February 23, 2016 at 9:17 am

    […] are currently being pushed through the Florida legislature completely change the definition of CBE that most educators are familiar with. The technology component will redefine the role of the teacher from educator to facilitator and […]

    Reply
  8. This is you should say no to Big Data | arthur~battram… says:
    February 20, 2017 at 3:10 am

    […] CBE Online is Neither Personalized Nor Higher-Order Thinking! (Nancy Bailey) https://nancyebailey.com/2016/01/23/cbe-online-is-neither-personalized-nor-higher-order-thinking/ […]

    Reply
  9. Warning: Florida’s CBE Pilot Program May Sound Like A Great Idea But May Turn Out To Be Not So Great. | accountabaloney says:
    January 8, 2018 at 3:40 pm

    […] written about our concerns regarding competency based education. You can read more concerns here, here and here. The biggest concern expressed is that, despite their popularity in the “reform […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply to CALL TO ACTION: Stop the Poorly Designed CBE Pilot (SB1714) | accountabaloney Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

Nancy E. Bailey
NancyEBailey1Nancy E. Bailey@NancyEBailey1·
17h

Teachers need support not shaming during this difficult time. They also need the vaccine! https://nancyebailey.com/2021/01/27/how-the-media-and-school-districts-shame-teachers-during-covid-19/

Reply on Twitter 1354433394055245826Retweet on Twitter 13544333940552458267Like on Twitter 135443339405524582610Twitter 1354433394055245826
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
MelieCab_84Melissa Caballero@MelieCab_84·
26 Jan

@MOREcaucusUFT @rweingarten @UFT @NYCSchools @CTULocal1 Schools are “so safe” my son’s school is closed for a third consecutive day... now the 6th closure since returning after Holiday break... the NYC percentage of teachers/staff/students sick with COVID has drastically increased. Why is this allowed?! What about this is safe?

Reply on Twitter 1354182403846238208Retweet on Twitter 135418240384623820812Like on Twitter 135418240384623820855Twitter 1354182403846238208
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
lauranbowmanLaura Bowman@lauranbowman·
26 Jan

Has anyone told the @CDCgov about the old and ineffective HVAC systems in our nation’s schools? https://twitter.com/cdcgov/status/1354128880119017473

CDC@CDCgov

A new @CDCMMWR finds that K-12 schools can limit the spread of #COVID19 through masks & other preventive measures, even with high rates of COVID-19 in the community. More: http://bit.ly/MMWR12621.

Reply on Twitter 1354207705884479488Retweet on Twitter 13542077058844794884Like on Twitter 13542077058844794885Twitter 1354207705884479488
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
NancyEBailey1Nancy E. Bailey@NancyEBailey1·
27 Jan

@lauranbowman @CDCgov It would be nice to see some of the @CDCgov actually make some school visits and talk to teachers. This is no different from what they said before is it?

Reply on Twitter 1354218268869992453Retweet on Twitter 13542182688699924534Like on Twitter 13542182688699924539Twitter 1354218268869992453
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
lauranbowmanLaura Bowman@lauranbowman·
25 Jan

The School Equity and Staffing Act (HB1929) would fully fund the #VBOE’s prescribed changes for #Virginia schools to meet the needs of students. This imp legislation is up in @VaHouse Approps. @DelegateTorian @MarkSicklesVA we ask that you vote to #FundOurSchools.

Reply on Twitter 1353828168705171457Retweet on Twitter 13538281687051714571Like on Twitter 13538281687051714574Twitter 1353828168705171457
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 Digital Learning dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading Reading Instruction recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2021 Nancy E. Bailey · Web Design by HNH Marketing.