• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Hillary Clinton and Charter School Myths

July 19, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 3 Comments

Last night the report from the AFT convention was that Hillary Clinton once again spoke about how charter schools provided traditional public schools with innovation. This is a recurring theme with her—one that has already drawn boos from teachers in the NEA. As one teacher put it last night, is she tone deaf?

Charter schools are responsible for shutting down hundreds of schools. They don’t do anything particularly innovative, or if they do it is because they are given the luxury of having smaller classes or special circumstances which are not afforded real public schools. But charter chains often don’t do better on tests than traditional public schools.

And I know of nothing unique that charter schools do that would qualify as innovative.

So many educators and parents know this that it is an embarrassment, really, that Clinton still clings to this mantra of charter innovation. Is it because of her connection to corporate heads who now direct how schools should run?

Education Week recently compared the education platforms of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.  Under “choice,” they mention that Hillary Clinton upset some charter advocates last fall when she stated that they didn’t serve all students.

The Wall Street Journal reported that one education reformer troubled by her comments was was Eli Broad. Broad is currently on the move to make all Los Angeles public schools charters. And it is stated that he threatened to withdraw campaign funding if Hillary Clinton didn’t retract her claim—which she did.

Clinton has also supported what she quantifies as high quality charter schools highlighted in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Many realized that ESSA was just an extension No Child Left Behind. Many believe it is a giveaway to charter schools.

And while Clinton notes that vouchers are bad and might go to “jihad” schools (again Education Week), we hear nothing about charter schools with all kinds of questionable connections.

Consider the concerns having to do with Gulen Charter Schools whose leader, Fethullah Gülen, was connected to the uprising in Turkey. Many of these charter schools are under a different name, so it is not easy for parents to know which charters are Gulen charters.

Charter schools are no better than vouchers. In fact, they are worse because so many school districts have been pushed to embrace them and they are not properly vetted for parents to know whether they work or not.

And as far as Donald Trump…his education platform is so sketchy it is hard to know what he thinks of charter schools if he thinks about them at all!

He has stated he likes local charter schools. But charter schools are not local in the true sense of the word especially when they are run by private companies. It no longer matters if they put the word “public” in front of the name.

As far as innovation, this is what I wrote last November.

After all the years of charter schools here is what I see.

  • They have longer school days.
  • Charter schools often have teachers who are at the mercy of the charter operator.
  • Charter school teachers don’t always have real teaching degrees or credentials.
  • Charter schools often use strict discipline.
  • Parents must sign contracts to do what the school administrators or teachers tell them they must do.
  • Charter schools counsel out special needs students.
  • Charter schools counsel out ELL students.
  • Charter schools kick out students who act out or whose parents don’t follow the contract.
  • Charter operators usually make more money than a school principal.
  • Teachers usually make less money than when they worked in traditional public schools.
  • Teachers often get fewer benefits than when they worked in traditional public schools.
  • Sometimes these schools shut down when they fail, but not always.
  • Charter schools are usually segregated schools.

Both candidates need to pay closer attention to the will of the people on this issue. Social media makes this election different from elections in the past. More people are paying attention and expect to see real education issues addressed fairly.

Pretending charter schools are something they aren’t just won’t work for either candidate. Teachers and parents are tired of myths.

Reference

Bailey, Nancy. Losing America’s Schools: The Fight to Reclaim Public Education (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016): 35-51.

Meckler, Laura. “Clinton Views on Charter Schools, Teacher Evaluations Upset Some Democrats.” The Wall Street Journal. Dec. 17, 2015.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: AFT, charter schools, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, innovation, Myths, NEA, Reality, vouchers

Comments

  1. Daun Kauffman says

    July 19, 2016 at 7:20 pm

    And then, later that day. . . https://lucidwitness.com/2016/04/17/hillary-wants-to-experiment-with-the-lives-of-poor-children/

    Reply
  2. Allan Freedman says

    July 19, 2016 at 7:35 pm

    Chilling insights for a tone deaf presidential race…

    Reply
  3. Jim Mordecai says

    July 19, 2016 at 9:48 pm

    Charters are not public schools. They are publicly funded but privately managed. Being privately managed means that charters have a private interest and not a public interest. Turkish male followers of Imam Gulen could not publicly manage over 150 charter schools financed by American taxpayers. But, that is what they legally do. Most charter schools in America are managed by a private corporate governing board. This keeps the public interest secondary and at arms length allowing for Gulen managers to take governance of this many American charter schools promote their private agenda that is non of the public that is paying the bill business according to charter law. Charters provide a form of taxation without real representation. The price of choice reform of American education system.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

Nancy E. Bailey
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
EricCeresaEric Ceresa@EricCeresa·
16 Jan

@clay_mcch @NancyEBailey1 This is an excellent argument for raising teachers' pay, not any sort of argument against a $15 min wage. And raising the min wage DOES raise wages for workers near the minimum. We just don't usually think about the fact that teachers fit that definition.

Reply on Twitter 1350263323212787712Retweet on Twitter 13502633232127877121Like on Twitter 13502633232127877122Twitter 1350263323212787712
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
tulticanThomas Ultican@tultican·
16 Jan

Charter Schools Are Killing Saint Louis Public. The City Is Nailing The Coffin Shut. by Lexi Perez Lane https://link.medium.com/8taMmwG44cb

Reply on Twitter 1350253072686018562Retweet on Twitter 13502530726860185621Like on Twitter 13502530726860185621Twitter 1350253072686018562
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
clay_mcchClay McChristian@clay_mcch·
15 Jan

So Biden’s $15 minimum wage comes out to $31,200 a year for a 40 hour work week. The starting salary for a beginning teacher in Texas is $33,660. So a person working a minimum wage job will be making almost the same as a teacher with a college degree. Does this make any sense? 🤷‍♂️

Reply on Twitter 1349914993114886146Retweet on Twitter 134991499311488614622363Like on Twitter 1349914993114886146126339Twitter 1349914993114886146
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
chicagospedpacChicago SpedPac@chicagospedpac·
15 Jan

.@ChiPubSchools can you tell us how many specIal educators were forced to resign this week due to your policy of not accommodating remote instruction? Break it down by SpEd teachers, SECAs and clinicians

Reply on Twitter 1350211361498927110Retweet on Twitter 135021136149892711024Like on Twitter 1350211361498927110103Twitter 1350211361498927110
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
susanohaSusan Ohanian@susanoha·
15 Jan

The authors consider the ways in which educational responses to COVID19 exemplify opportunistic disaster
capitalism.
Disaster Capitalism, Rampant EdTech
Opportunism, and the Advancement of
Online Learning in the Era of COVID19
https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/issue/current

Reply on Twitter 1350167077487861761Retweet on Twitter 13501670774878617611Like on Twitter 1350167077487861761Twitter 1350167077487861761
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 Digital Learning dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading Reading Instruction recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2021 Nancy E. Bailey · Web Design by HNH Marketing.