• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

More Social-Emotional Learning Hype

August 15, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 2 Comments

Post Views: 196

Helping children with their emotions is something teachers have done for years. Certainly, assisting children and teens with appropriate, caring behavior is an important task. And, yes, there are ways to help children feel good about who they are and what they can contribute to the world.

Of course educators should address a child’s feelings and their emotional well-being. Schools should be beautiful settings with lovely activities that tell a child the adults and their community care about them.

But all of the new Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) hype is, unfortunately, simply an afterthought to Common Core. And it doesn’t work when you say, “Oops, we forgot to consider a child’s feelings, so, yep, let’s add some checklists and objectives and we will be good to go.”

It doesn’t work that way.

Last week I wrote about the relatively new social-emotional learning hype that is sweeping the states. SEL4MA is short for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) for Massachusetts, and they began following me on Twitter. I love that they did, because they present all kinds of issues to write about. But it is frightening too.

Like the fact that the two reasons they give for the need to work with children’s SEL are:

  1. Increase academic achievement (up 11% universally and 17% for at-risk students).
  2. Reduce the staggering human and financial costs caused by violence, addiction and other social maladies (social-emotional learning skills up 22% and for every one dollar invested in effective SEL, the return is $11 (SEL to Reduce Cost)).

Both of these objectives are not directly about a child’s happiness. They are about getting a child’s achievement levels up and reducing the problems they supposedly cause in society.

While one certainly wants to reduce costs tied to illiteracy and social problems, schools should be about helping the children themselves thrive. All the other stuff falls into place when you accomplish this task.

Herein, one finds the great divide between today’s education reformers and the many educators and parents who understand that the child’s feelings and social well-being must come first.

For example, and at the risk of repeating myself:

  • You don’t help a child have a better self-image by sending them to a school building that’s a dangerous facility, ugly in every way, and where they have lead-tainted water to drink.
  • Nonstop drilling of subjects that could be enjoyable to learn makes a child hate school.
  • You don’t create stress in a child and think that will help them learn better. In other words, you don’t lift their spirits by nonstop testing online with a computer that isn’t a real human.
  • You don’t knock out any semblance of socializing—like recess and pleasant lunchtimes—and think that will increase positive vibes in a kid.
  • Telling children they need to get grit and keep at it, when they have unprepared teachers who fail to help them learn, isn’t great either.
  • Making a child with a disability or second language feel badly due to the unjustified test they failed, and which will keep them back a grade, is depressing.
  • Telling a student who worked hard but could not pass the ill-tested standards, that they won’t get a real diploma, doesn’t create positive feelings.

More and more the SEL BS appears to be about social control and not the welfare of the child.

It doesn’t have to be this way! Restructuring our public schools to make them places that address the real needs of children in a positive manner, will, in the long run, make a great America.

Pushing behavioral standards for standards sake just won’t work.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Behavior, Children, Social Emotional Learning, socialization

Comments

  1. Cynthia B MannLCSW says

    August 15, 2016 at 10:58 am

    As a school counselor for 24 years, I usually felt that I was the Underground Railroad of social emotional issues point person. I had one administrator, out of 4 over the years who supported psycho-social services.. Working in a semi-rural area with 1/2 of the families second language learners & 1/2 below poverty level, there are few community social services. To be succinct, now under the best of circumstances, it is unlikely that kids are getting SEL (other than with classroom teacher)-no counseling, no class meetings, no age-appropriate family life classes. When admin says it’s covered, just know that means someone has been assigned to do a bare minimum and most schools don’t even do that. In California the ratio is probably 1200:1 students-to-counselor now.
    If teachers barely have time to teach to the test, in systems that have decimated special edu laws, (“SPED”)who could possibly expect them to teach SEL(if we acronym we can say it faster and not really have to help the next generation be people with empathy & integrity) I fear for the future.

    Loading...
    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      August 16, 2016 at 1:56 pm

      As a special ed. teacher, school counselors were the greatest! They were always helpful and provided great support for my students and their families. At the high school level, counselors also provide an important link to college and vocations.

      But there aren’t enough of them. You’re right. And the social-emotional support side of what they do has been overshadowed in some places by test and college prep. You’re right about that too.

      We should have more school counselors who are able to help the school staff provide the necessary SEL support to students. Their role is critical.

      And thank you for the important role you have played in the lives of students and also thank you for such an informative comment!

      Loading...
      Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools Children class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public education public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform science of reading Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2025 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.

%d