• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

The Privatized Beaded Necklace “School of the Future”

September 17, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 4 Comments

Post Views: 229

The PBS NOVA “School of the Future” was interesting in that many corporate messages were strung together like an expensive necklace made of plastic beads.

Grit, mindset, brain studies, social-emotional learning…you name it…it was there. Showcased individuals gave shout-outs to others in the program. Sal Kahn yelling out to students that they all have a mindset was one example. The brain study that praised Springboard Collaborative was another.

Eileen Campion, a publicist for NOVA, was kind enough to ask me if I had watched the program and whether my opinion had changed from just viewing the promo. She also reminded me of the link PBS.Org/Nova. I encourage everyone to watch “School of the Future.” I think it does a good job of covering the changing school reforms that affect our public schools. It doesn’t matter if we don’t agree. We should all understand what’s happening.

There were a couple of things about the program that I liked, and much that left me worried. While the program didn’t discuss digital instruction as much as I thought it would, it was in the background. The Alt School and Springboard Collaborative were prominent. And there were other hints.

At the end, children were asked what they thought the school of the future would be like. One said there would be no more teachers. Another said it would be all computers. Children always know more than they are given credit.

Here are some of my observations for what they’re worth.

First. I appreciated that Linda Darling-Hammond and others distinguished that many of our public schools in wealthier areas do well on international tests. So often a general statement is made that our public schools are failing, and it is important to realize, quite sadly, that we have many more students who live in poverty than other countries.

That our public schools and teachers are being called upon to fix these societal conditions, also being blamed for them, is worth noting.

Second. The Springboard Collaborative, a nonprofit, claims to be successful at both print and digital instruction. Teachers, students and parents or “facilitators” wore green t-shirts advertising Springboard. I cringe at such marketing in schools. Publishing companies have always sold teachers their materials—that’s nothing new—but they were never this bold about it.

I wonder if the program was selected by the school board, or if the school board was influenced by outsiders to choose Springboard.

The kindergartner and his father showed up. For some unclear reason the child’s teacher, influenced by Springboard, felt the student needed to work harder at his reading. So the dad was asking him close-reading-like questions. But the child read well for a kindergartner. It worries me to see children pushed to read formally so young.

Third. Along with this, as I said before, I am not always against brain research. But how much should little children focus? It is easy to get edgy watching such experiments. We know there is such an unreasonable push for young children to learn at a much earlier age than is developmentally appropriate. I don’t think I could have sat as long as the child with all the story distractions!

I also took issue with the sleep research. We have known about the adolescent/sleep association for years. Yet, instead of changing the environment to address teen needs (too inconvenient we’re told) the idea in “School of the Future” appears to be to change the teens themselves.

In this strange new world, what if teens adapt to a new circadian rhythm but their hormones get changed too? What if we alter teen behavior and make it more difficult? I say leave Mom Nature alone!

Fourth One clue that we are going digital, I think, was found in the middle school. The teacher, who also seemed to be doing Common Core, emphasized constantly quizzing students. Short quizzes that are ongoing are like digital questions after facts are presented. Memorizing was emphasized too much.

Also, a lot was made about middle school students forgetting. I taught middle school students for many years, and I was often surprised at what they would remember! Often a student would remind me of something I said months earlier. Perhaps their long-term memory works better.       

Fifth. My favorite part of the program was the class in the Bronx. The teachers kept talking about making their students feel good about themselves. I guess what I liked most was no one talked about no excuses. I hope that’s gone for good! The teachers seemed warm and friendly. The class size, however, looked too big. And the children looked tired.

Sixth. When Angela Duckworth entered the school, and Carol Dweck appeared signing her book, of course, you knew what was coming. “Grit” and “mindset” have some truth behind them, but are also way overplayed. They are controversial too. Outside of the program, Nicholas Tampio recently wrote about grit. His analysis is stunning.

I think there is some danger in keeping a child on the same path for too long, especially if they are truly frustrated or uninterested.

When I hear this push for students to always stick with a project, part of Kenny Roger’s song The Gambler always pops into my head.

You’ve got to know when to hold ‘em

Know when to fold ‘em

Know when to walk away

And know when to run…

Seventh I have learned to dislike any kind of school that has children focus on one subject as a priority. I used to like magnet schools. I think they could bring children together. But students need exposure to a variety of skills and courses when they are in school.

It was impressive that the students from Dos Pueblos Engineering Academy understood so much about engineering. I just wonder if they missed out on something they will never know they liked.

Eighth

A sad part of the program was the high pressured high school. This school is not unique. Suicides are found in university settings too. But “School of the Future” seems to fight between the push to have children learning more, and the pressure they face later. You have to draw the connection. Pushing children to learn faster leads to hyper learning later, and the casualties as we see in the program, can be horrendous.

I still think too, that there are many things that could be done to reduce stress in a student’s schooling.

  • Get rid of retention.
  • Provide school nurses and wraparound services.
  • Give parents support groups.
  • Add more school counselors.
  • Professionalize teachers.
  • Quit closing public schools.
  • Shore up public schools.
  • Create safe, cheerful clean school facilities.
  • Drop high-stakes testing.
  • Reduce class sizes.
  • Really personalize learning (not digital).
  • Bring back the arts.
  • Make reading a joyful experience.
  • Ensure all students have recess (some states are doing this).
  • Better address dyslexia and learning disabilities in children.

There was much more about this program I have not discussed. Feel free to comment on your likes and dislikes.

Next week, NOVA will be “Doubts About Neuroeducation.” That sounds interesting. I will be watching. That’s all I am going to say about it for now….

I will be on the Rick Smith show, 5:30 ET, Monday Sept. 19 to discuss the program.       

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Brain Studies, Children and Learning, Digital Learning, PBS "School of the Future", privatization, Springboard Collaborative, Student Attention, teachers, Teens and Sleep Studies

Comments

  1. ciedie aech says

    September 17, 2016 at 2:39 pm

    Interesting to start seeing inside the minds of those who have been led so far down the garden path that they now willingly, if very blithely, give up on tradition. The whole technology-tracking world of the “future” schoolroom is much, much, much too close to the “eugenics” (go ahead; look up the NAZI connection) approach to valuing people and…should scare the bejeebies out of anyone with a brain.

    Loading...
    Reply
    • ciedie aech says

      September 17, 2016 at 2:41 pm

      Too harsh, maybe. How about “Should scare the bejeebies out of anyone who notes the connection.”

      Loading...
      Reply
      • Nancy Bailey says

        September 18, 2016 at 8:54 am

        It certainly is lacking when it comes to making human connections. While I know that there are some that don’t do a good job, I cannot imagine a world without teachers. Thank you, Ciedie. I always appreciate your thoughtful comments.

        Loading...
        Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Our Schools–Back to the Future – resseger says:
    September 21, 2016 at 7:19 pm

    […] I am in complete agreement with the serious concerns that Nancy Bailey (See here ) and Peggy Robertson (See here) have brought up in reaction to the PBS NOVA program “School of […]

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools Children class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public education public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform science of reading Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2025 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.

%d