It doesn’t matter how much trouble Mark Zuckerberg might appear to be in with Facebook, he and his wife still find time to mess with education and give elitist advice to teachers.
Their latest initiative is to claim teachers need to learn brain science. They’re donating $1 million to Neuroteach Global, an online PD platform created by the Center for Transformative Teaching and Learning, calling themselves a mind, brain, and education research center.
Some teachers will get financial support to learn about brain science, while others will pay for it on their own, or likely through their school districts.
It’s also about transforming education to technology.
The group is based out of St. Andrew’s Episcopal School in Potomac, Maryland. The sponsors of the program include Teach for America. They’re hoping to sell this program to schools and universities across the country. How ironic that a group like TFA with minimal instruction and understanding about teaching, is a part of promoting brain science to teachers.
Real teachers from reputable university education programs have always taken child development courses and psychology. Special education teachers take more coursework that deals with language difficulties and the brain.
It’s important for teachers to always learn new information and to stay current with the latest research concerning how students learn. And most parents and teachers recognize the importance of digital learning in today’s schools. But this sounds like a way to forward the agenda of online learning, and also a way for a group of people to make money.
According to Ed. Week:
Supporting Neuroteach Global furthers CZI’s goal of education serving the “whole child…”
Last year, the organization announced plans to put hundreds of millions of dollars toward funding “whole-child personalized learning,” with the aim of customizing students’ education to their individual preferences and needs.
“Customizing” or “personalizing” is about sitting children continuously online in schools like K12, Summit, and Rocketship.
Consider that Bror Saxberg is the vice president of learning science at CZI and also a spokesperson about this program. He has an MD and degrees from impressive universities. But his work experience raises red flags when it comes to technology and the privatization of public schools. Saxberg has had high level administrative positions at Kaplan, Inc, K12, Inc., Knowledge Testing Enterprises, and Knowledge Universe.
If the CZI wants to spend their money on brain initiatives I can think of some other causes.
- Ensure that all children come to school well-fed and with an adequate health plan.
- Get the lead out of the water in school buildings and poor homes, a major cause of learning disabilities.
- Elevate the teaching profession to eliminate low moral which causes depression.
- Work to lower class sizes, so teachers will better identify and assist students with mental health difficulties.
- Ensure all schools have enough qualified nurses and counselors.
- Fund great libraries and qualified librarians since this has been shown to improve achievement.
- Put the arts back into every public school, so all students get access to a whole curriculum.
- Fully fund special education across the continuum so students get the support they need.
- Fix poor and dangerous school buildings so students and teachers feel welcome in their schools.
Those behind the program have written a book called Neuroteach: Brain Science and the Future of Education. They’re selling an online program through the school.
Neuroteach Global offers 3- to 5-minute online mini-lessons that introduce research-backed teaching strategies. Users can pay for a 1-hour, 3-hour, or 12-hour course; the longest program, which results in a mind, brain, and education certification, costs $400. As part of the program, teachers apply the strategies the learn with their students and receive feedback from online coaches.
It’s also humiliating to pay to get this instruction from those tied to a private/parochial school with a selective admission fee of $41,000 to St. Andrew’s upper school and $28,000 for the lower school.
How do they know what teachers need in public schools?
Technology can be a great tool to use in the classroom for activities that are fun for children and add to what and how they learn. Learning more about how the brain works is important.
But CZI are driven to end brick-and mortar schools and have every child on a computer, learning at home or in substandard charters. Teach for America recruits know little about teaching and will make great babysitters for students, telling them to sit still and showing them how to stay focused on the computer.
Telling teachers they need to learn brain science to be better teachers is a new kick in the face for teachers, implying they don’t know what they need to teach. It’s meant to be an insult and also to sell an unproven program to make money.
And once again the ultimate goal is to replace teachers with technology.
Dienne says
Actual brain science shows definitively negative consequence of digital “learning”, especially for young children. So we know that whatever “brain science” Chan-Suckerberg want teachers learning about is quackery. Might as well spend the money teaching teachers about phrenology.
Robert D. Shepherd says
exactly!
Nancy Bailey says
Thanks, Dienne! Great point.
LisaM says
Wonder how they got their foot in the door at the swanky St Andrew’s School? I’m surprised that the rich parents would tolerate this nonsense.
Nancy Bailey says
That’s a great question. I wonder how much of this St. Andrews really buys into for their students.
LisaM says
It would be interesting to see a list of student names. That area of town has the most “stink tank” people residing within it’s area code. My guess is that there will be a direct link to a “deformer” who is cashing in on the deal…..Fordham? I can’t see that this will go well if one (or more) of the darling little snowflakes doesn’t do well with the new scam….lot’s of parents are lawyers.
Nancy Bailey says
They are selling the program to teachers, but public schools are set up differently. Thanks, Lisa.
Christine Langhoff says
Sounds like a first cousin to Betsy DeVos’ Neurocore scam. This “system”purports to cure ADHA by watching “curated” videos. And if your insurance won’t pay for it, they’ll connect you to loan service that will!
https://www.neurocorecenters.com
Nancy Bailey says
I forgot about the DeVos scam. A lot of brain quackery B.S scams. Thanks for the link, Christine.
Sadly, there’s a lack of credentialed health services and real psychiatric care for children, teens and adults with mental illness, many who wide up homeless on the streets.
Roy Turrentine says
“Get the lead out of the water in school buildings…” Considering some students, we might need to remove lead from a particular portion of the anatomy.
Quite seriously, the idea that students will learn more if teachers understand axons and dendirites is contingent on students who are willing and able to use their brains on something besides the latest video addiction. Figure it out. Our most motivated students are now, by virtue of the testing and grading we do, far more interested in what is on the test than any other thing. Got a review for the test? What is on the test. All the brain research in the world will not suffice to motivate a child with an iPad or any of the other cockeyed stuff Zukerberg and the Silicon Valley Five have been selling us.
I asked a child why she missed the last two days today. Family problems, she said. It was easy. Try to get that out of a personalized learning module with a computer. Took me less than a minute in a conversation.
Nancy Bailey says
The emphasis on testing has had repercussions. Thanks for making that point, Roy.
Betty Casey says
According to this https://www.the74million.org/blog/, Barron Trump is a student at St. Andrew’s Episcopal School where this was tested.
Nancy Bailey says
Thanks for posting, Betty. Someone else mentioned that on Twitter. I did not know.