• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

It’s Wrong to Force Four and Five Year Olds to Read! Focus on Speaking and Listening Instead!

December 7, 2019 By Nancy Bailey 13 Comments

Post Views: 1,410

With No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, and Common Core State Standards, some adults have been led to believe that four- and five-year-old children should read by the end of kindergarten. Preschoolers are pushed to be ready for formal reading instruction by the time they enter kindergarten.

This is a dangerous idea rooted in corporate school reform. Children who struggle to read might inaccurately believe they have a problem, or reading could become a chore they hate.

Pushing children to focus on reading means they miss listening and speaking skills, precursors to reading. These skills are developed through play, which leads to interest in words and a reason to want to read.

Some children might learn to read in kindergarten, and others might show up to kindergarten already reading, but many children are not ready to read when they are four or five years old. And just because a child knows how to read in kindergarten, doesn’t mean they won’t have other difficulties with speech and listening.

When children have disabilities, speaking and listening skills are critical.

Forcing children to focus on reading early denies children opportunities to work on those other missing skills.

Also, there’s no research, no evidence that a child’s brain has evolved to indicate children can and should read earlier. Our culture has changed, but children have not. Even if new reading methods are developed that assist children to be better readers, there’s no reason to push children to read before they are ready.

While current complaints center around how children aren’t being prepared well to read by teachers, few consider the drastic changes made to preschool and kindergarten classrooms due to corporate reform. These changes have been foisted on classrooms for years, eliminating opportunities for children to use speaking and listening skills.

  • Play has been eliminated, like play kitchens, dress-up, building blocks, and naptime (giggling, whispering, and resting quietly). These were past staples in the kindergarten classroom.
  • Recess where children socialize has been reduced or eliminated for years. Parents must get a state mandate for some recess!
  • Children in poor schools still miss art and music, classes involving self-expression. It has been replaced by intense reading instruction.
  • Young children face a glut of standardized assessment, made to sit still while taking repetitive, and now nonstop embedded tests online.
  • When children attend strict charter schools that focus solely on managing behavior, they miss out on opportunities to speak.

These changes have affected early learners and how they are introduced to reading instruction. With added pressure to read in kindergarten and preschool, children have lost opportunities to use the language skills that prepare them to read!

To show how reading expectations in kindergarten have gotten out of control, I reviewed several respected early childhood books from the past to see what’s stated about learning to read at this age. The changes are stunning.

1. The Early Childhood Years: The 2 to 6 Year Old by Theresa and Frank Kaplan (p. 384-390, 1983).

The authors discuss the importance of teaching children to “speak the language with success.” They are concerned about language acquisition in the early years. They don’t emphasize reading instruction. They encourage helping children with the following:

  • Coordination
  • Visual-motor control
  • Visual perception
  • Visual memory
  • Auditory perception
  • Auditory memory
  • Oral language production.

2. Your Baby & Child: From Birth to Age Five by Penelope Leach (p. 432-443, 1990).

Here the reader will find nothing about formally teaching young children to read. There’s, instead, a chapter on language.

Like the Kaplans, Leach emphasizes conversing with children. She mentions the period where children chatter incessantly, reminding parents to “join in.” When they ask questions, children want to be heard. They want validation. Leach promotes activities that focus on speech and listening.

  • Provide children with play, drama, and art and music activities.
  • Use picture books to help children analyze and associate pictures with words.
  • Help children listen with stories they hear read aloud.
  • Encouraging children to tell their own stories.

She reminds adults that children need to observe them reading.

3. Educating Young Children by Mary Hohmann and David P. Weikart (p. 358-9, 1997).

This is from the High/Scope Educational Foundation. This book comes from those working in the great High Scope Preschool Curriculum, and the book is filled with pictures of busy preschoolers actively exploring their world. Reading aloud to children and letting them choose the familiar books they’d like hearing read is considered critical. But adults should also choose books they think children will like.

They remind adults that it’s normal for children to like having the same stories repeatedly read during the same sitting and over a period of weeks and months. This is important and helps children learn to read.

They don’t push structured reading programs where children must sit and work. These children are on the go!

4. Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, by Steven P. Shelov, M.D. F.A.A.P. Robert E. Hannemann, M.D. F.A.A.P., Associate Medical Editor. (p. 348-9, 1991).

This book from The American Academy of Pediatrics, advises adults to approach reading by inquiring whether a child is interested in learning the names of letters, shows interest in looking through books and magazines, or writing with a pencil or pen. Do children listen attentively during story time?

They warn that if children aren’t ready, not to “drill” them on letters, numbers, colors, shapes, or words. Encourage children with entertaining books, games, songs, and some computer programs.

5, Your Seven-Year-Old: Life in a Minor Key. Louise Bates Ames, Ph.D. and Carol Chase Haber, M.A. (p.70-72, 1985).

Here’s what’s expected of seven-year-old children in order to compare to what’s currently expected of  fours and fives.

Sevens usually recognize familiar words, but they still make mistakes. They often omit words like and, he, had, and but, or a final s or y.

Seven hesitates on new words and prefers to have them supplied (rather than be forced to spell them out). Or they may simply guess, using a word of similar appearance, often one with the same first and last letter, although the length of the word may be shortened (green for garden, betful for beautiful). Also, substitutions of meaning (the for a, was for lived) are also common. Speed of reading, like fluency, shows marked individual variation.

Inevitably some seven-year-olds have not actually reached a full seven-year-old level of reading. Many are between what reading specialist Jeanne Chall calls stage 1 (initial reading or decoding, ages Six to Seven) and stage 2 (confirmation, fluency, ungluing from print, ages Seven to Eight). In the first of these stages, according to Chall, the child learns the arbitrary set of letters, and associates them with the corresponding parts of spoken words. He interiorizes cognitive knowledge about reading, such as what the letters are for, and how to know when a mistake is made.

Sevens are more amenable to criticism than younger children. Adults are encouraged to watch for fatigue and frustration. Spelling is usually behind reading ability at this age. Sevens might enjoy copying words but still can’t spell them by heart. Sevens are especially confused by vowels.

____

When children enjoy words and they indicate they wish to learn to read, there’s no point in holding them back from reading. But this obsession by adults to make all young children read must be seriously reviewed.

This early push might be why test scores continue to be lackluster, and even if test scores are high, it doesn’t mean young children enjoy reading or will look forward to learning in the future.

Forcing young children to read before they’re ready, while eliminating speech and listening skills, is a seriously ignored concern that should be added to the current reading discussion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Early Childhood, kindergarten expectations, kindergarten reading demands, preschool expectations, preschool reading demands, reading, Reading Instruction, Speech and listening skills, Unproven reading expectations for early childhood

Comments

  1. Adele A Roof says

    December 7, 2019 at 12:28 pm

    The information you present here is so important!

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 9, 2019 at 7:41 pm

      Thank you, Adele.

      Reply
  2. Cathryn Ory says

    December 7, 2019 at 9:45 pm

    I was shocked to learn that my son had to be able to read a list of “sight words” at the end of kindergarten. And that was in 2009! He did fine because he was already almost 6 years old, but I could see the struggles of a lot of the other children. What happened to the blocks, the paints, the singing? Almost all gone. No wonder there is an epidemic of anxiety and depression in teenagers today.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 9, 2019 at 7:41 pm

      I think you bring up a great point about anxiety and depression. Thank you, Cathryn.

      Reply
  3. RT says

    December 8, 2019 at 7:16 am

    We now see more and more kids that are older in ninth grade. When I first started teaching, older kids were generally from poor families and had been held back in the lower grades. Now they are mostly from economically stable families who can afford another year of day care or atheletic families that want their children to have a physical advantage. Luckily, this second group contains more boys, for their general delay in development means that more of them are too young to write their first novel in kindergarten.

    We have also experienced more children who can read pretty well, but their retention of what they have read is problematic. They cannot read anything and get something out of it. They report that they read some story about history and cannot recall enough of it to tell it. Some read it and cannot tell you any of it.

    Some years ago, I was introduced to a teaching idea I liked. The students would pass along a story, with one student saying once upon a time in France there was a bread shortage and the next one would say then the King hired Necker to straighten out the finances then the next one would say he had the king call the Estates General. I was excited. Seemed pretty straightforward and uncomplicated. We saw a video and read a selection. Then we tried. It was a disaster. They could not even do it without the important names.

    If learning to read demands, as has been stated above, that children want to read, then unsung that reading to learn important facts, stories, and principles demands that to an even greater extent. Our children do not read for the most part. Rather than blaming this on the folks that do not teach phonics or whatever other technique is favored, I suggest we start trying to get folks interested in the things they need to learn. Students who want to read will learn to read what they want to read to get the knowledge they want.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 9, 2019 at 7:43 pm

      Thank you for commenting. I appreciate your feedback.

      Reply
  4. James S Katakowski says

    December 9, 2019 at 5:59 pm

    What ever happened to Piaget and Montessori as in preschool education? As a retired old developmentalist these were the gurus of the time back in the 70’s how soon we forget. Sad we learned so much back in the day and we have lost the learning of preschool which is the greatest investment in our future of our young. Plus prevention is so much cheaper than rehabilitation as we learned with Headstart. Too bad we lost that somewhere in the last 30-40 years. I guess someone didn’t listen to our educators.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 9, 2019 at 7:44 pm

      Great point, James! I’ve heard of places that dispute Piaget. I know that’s strange but it happens. Thanks.

      Reply
  5. Rick B says

    December 11, 2019 at 10:51 am

    Adults who like make young children into “proto-adults” have completely missed the point of childhood. Creating “trophy children” misses the point of parenting. Little good will come from this rush to quasi-maturity.

    Reply
  6. Nancy Bailey says

    December 17, 2019 at 9:17 am

    My thanks to Diane Ravitch.

    https://dianeravitch.net/2019/12/15/nancy-bailey-its-wrong-to-force-four-and-five-year-olds-to-read/

    Reply
  7. Phyllis says

    December 21, 2019 at 4:41 pm

    HiI Nancy –
    Great article. And great that Diane Ravitch posted it! I wrote an article (link below ) for the Answer Sheet in the Washington Post which corroborates all that you are. saying. I am a very concerned kindergarten teacher. I am doing everything I can in my classroom to provide a healthy, balanced education for my students. I include play and lots of movement, music and singing.
    You’d be tremendously discouraged to see the curriculum we have been given to teach language arts this year, It’s called Into Reading by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. What they are trying to force five years old to do is criminal. For example, in the first couple of weeks of kindergarten, write an opinion piece using a five step process from first draft to publication. This level of inappropriate and irresponsible content at the kindergarten grade level continues throughout this reckless and damaging curriculum. As my colleague commented when she read it (she is a 35 year veteran kindergarten teacher) there is no way a single kindergarten teacher was on the writing committee.
    Thank you for the work you are doing!
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/05/08/kindergarten-teacher-why-our-youngest-learners-are-doomed-right-out-gate-road-map-fix-it/

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 21, 2019 at 5:24 pm

      Hi Phyllis, I remember this Answer Sheet report! You did an excellent job of describing the problem. Thank you for connecting it to this post.

      Reply
      • Phyllis says

        December 22, 2019 at 8:19 am

        If you want to use it as a guest post at any time please feel free. My mission is to get the word out about what is happening and reverse harmful practices.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
11h

Things to ponder about the current discussions around SOR. From ChatGPT @ChatwithGPT
https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/?fbclid=IwAR0Fhkczq46nJq8n5ob1q2xF5Q9aFc9ya04TEgYCaVTyEElEQg_UbWfoROY

Reply on Twitter 1637853806833590275 Retweet on Twitter 1637853806833590275 6 Like on Twitter 1637853806833590275 21 Twitter 1637853806833590275
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
19 Mar

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 18 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 46 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
deguire_mike Mike DeGuire, Ph. D. @deguire_mike ·
4h

"The privatization movement has been strategically designed...by billionaires and their fellow investors for specific purposes: to lower their own tax burden, and ideologically to dismantle public education." @NPEaction @NancyEBailey1 @TheAndySpears
https://medium.com/@jfiske80/billionaires-and-their-investors-are-impacting-education-policies-in-colorado-and-especially-in-c523579674af

Reply on Twitter 1637957759751831558 Retweet on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Like on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Twitter 1637957759751831558
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nepctweet NEPC @nepctweet ·
10h

"Let’s honor our students by providing them free quality democratic public schools that reject no one." @NancyEBailey1 https://bit.ly/3FE0KFA

Reply on Twitter 1637870110840094721 Retweet on Twitter 1637870110840094721 3 Like on Twitter 1637870110840094721 2 Twitter 1637870110840094721
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
dianeravitch Diane Ravitch 🇺🇸🇺🇦🌈 @dianeravitch ·
18 Mar

Voucher schools don’t have to comply with IDEA for kids with disabilities. They are allowed to discriminate for any reason or none at all. #schoolschoose https://twitter.com/KatieLikesBikes/status/1636446553429647376

Katie 🌻 @KatieLikesBikes

@Forrest4Trees @GregAbbott_TX No one is reporting that private schools don't have to adhere to the Federal IDEA act. Kids with #disabilities will be further harmed because #publicschools provide important services to #PWD and are essentially having their budgets cut in half by the voucher system.

Reply on Twitter 1637123379458088962 Retweet on Twitter 1637123379458088962 64 Like on Twitter 1637123379458088962 178 Twitter 1637123379458088962
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.