• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

‘Screens in Schools Action Kit’ to Help Parents Push Back Against Edtech Overuse

February 21, 2020 By Nancy Bailey 2 Comments

Parents and educators worry about how much time students spend facing digital devices. Here is a useful resource to help children live lives that aren’t dominated by screen use.

Contact: Seth Evans, Chair, (seth@commercialfreechildhood.org) Screens in Schools Work Group, Children’s Screen Time Action Network

Advocates Release ‘Screens in Schools Action Kit’ to Help Parents Push Back Against Edtech Overuse

The free resource from the Children’s Screen Time Action Network will help parents advocate for less device use and more hands-on learning in schools.

BOSTON, MA —February 10, 2020—Today, the Children’s Screen Time Action Network released the Screens in Schools Action Kit to help parents and educators address the overuse of educational technologies in schools. The Action Kit is a product of a grassroots movement challenging Silicon Valley myths that tech is a panacea for all that ails our educational system, and that “personalized learning” is better delivered by software and algorithms than highly skilled educators. The Children’s Screen Time Action Network is a project of Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood.

“When it comes to demanding what is best for our children in schools, no voices ring louder and carry more weight than those belonging to parents,” said Joe Clement, award-winning teacher and author of Screen Schooled. “Educated, involved parents are the first and best line of defense for our children. Those who want to make a difference can use the practical, convenient resources laid out in this Action Kit to educate and involve as many parents, educators and decision makers as possible. Working together, we can give our kids a healthier, happier future.”

Parents’ and educators’ concerns about Big Tech’s infiltration of public education in the U.S. cover a range of issues, including the social-emotional effects on children’s development; the invasion of kids’ privacy; harmful physical impacts from the overuse of screens and digital devices; displacement of hands-on and peer-to-peer collaborative learning; exposure to marketing and materialism; the gamification of learning; and the deprofessionalization of teaching.

The Action Kit’s authors are all members of the Action Network’s Screens in Schools Work Group, and many of them are educators or parents who have been working with their own districts to limit screen time. The work group members created the Action Kit to help others follow in their footsteps.

“I began advocating for more balanced screen use in our school district with a small group of concerned parents four and a half years ago, and I’m thrilled we’re having a national conversation about the impact of screen use on development and learning,” said contributing Network member Katie Talarico, teacher, parent, and advocate in the Upper St. Clair, PA School District. “This Action Kit makes a large problem seem more manageable, and has made solutions seem within reach! I know this resource will help parents, teachers, and administrators work together to create the best possible 21st century education for our children.”

“It’s incredibly powerful that an all-volunteer work group of parents and educators have created a resource not only to advocate in their own districts, but to help anyone and everyone rein in the edtech takeover,” said Josh Golin, Executive Director of CCFC. “That’s how change happens.”

The explosion of edtech in schools is thanks in large part to calculated marketing. The edtech industry has followed the Big Pharma playbook by wining and dining school officials, and capitalizing on the underfunding of public education to sell their own products. But research suggests adding more tech does not necessarily improve learning. A study by the National Education Policy Center on Personalized Learning and Digital Privatization of Curriculum and Teaching concluded that philanthropic funds are boosting the proliferation of digital curriculum and devices despite serious concerns about device use. An Education Week Special Report found that educational dollars are better spent on professional development and smaller class sizes, and that most teachers feel “personalized learning” has failed to define benefits and consider risks.

“As a recently retired teacher I could see the ways that the digital culture was affecting my students’ attention and readiness to learn,” said Seth Evans, Chair of the Screens in Schools Work Group, who produced the kit. “This Action Kit will provide tools for educators with similar concerns to talk to colleagues and teachers’ unions, administrators, parents, and students about their concerns regarding the overuse of screens.”

“Many parents are beginning to understand the risks of excessive screen use at home and are setting limits, but then feel their efforts are being sabotaged by overuse of tech in schools,” said Jean Rogers, director of Screen Time programs at CCFC and leader of the Action Network. “While creating the toolkit, we heard from parents concerned that their children were on screens for many hours during the school day and then required to do homework on them in the evening.

Health, privacy, and exposure to advertising are among the top worries, and opting out has been a difficult and lonely road.”

“Many parents and teachers are concerned about children’s use of digital technology in schools but are at a loss for what to do about it,” said Network member Faith Boninger, Co-Director of the Commercialism in Education Research Unit of the National Education Policy Center. “This Action Kit provides resources to help them address their concerns with their schools and districts. It also lets them know that they’re not alone in their doubts about the value of digital educational programs.”

Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood

Children’s Screen Time Action Network

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: children and technology, Children's Screen Time Action Network, Digital Instruction, Overuse of technology in and out of school, screens in school, Technology

Comments

  1. Willie says

    February 24, 2020 at 9:39 pm

    I know this is slightly off topic but, I wonder if those Augmentive Communication devices may have evolved from “Facilitated Communication” a discredited thoery. These devices are huge profits for big tech. We had hundreds of years of sign language and facial expressions to help a non verbal person get his needs met and communicate but now there is a push for “computer voice” devices in school and homes for kids with “autism”. I heard that in Australia the radio schoosl were replaced with computer learning for the kids living in remote outback areas that were not fesible to have a school. The quality of these distance learning schools declined after the radio was replace with a darn computer. The radio was pahsed out between 2000 and 2010 Did Rupert Murdoch play a role?

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      February 24, 2020 at 9:47 pm

      I’ve always stayed away from criticizing Augmentive Communication, so I never thought about this. I do know rural education is an easy placement of tech. Interesting points. I will watch for information on this. Thanks, Willie.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

Nancy E. Bailey
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
NancyOsborne180Nancy Osborne@NancyOsborne180·
17 Jan

In order to restore students' voices we need to end the focus on high stakes standardized testing. See Nancy Bailey's six reasons why that's a good idea here:
https://nancyebailey.com/2021/01/14/6-ways-high-stakes-standardized-testing-destroys-student-voice/ #TBATs
@NancyEBailey1

Reply on Twitter 1350859082740199424Retweet on Twitter 13508590827401994242Like on Twitter 13508590827401994242Twitter 1350859082740199424
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
lauranbowmanLaura Bowman@lauranbowman·
6h

https://www.news4jax.com/health/2021/01/21/20-30-increase-in-local-children-infected-with-covid-19/

Reply on Twitter 1353022779579375616Retweet on Twitter 13530227795793756161Like on Twitter 1353022779579375616Twitter 1353022779579375616
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
bledwineEducator for Michelle Wu 🍎@bledwine·
22 Jan

@AngryCorinne @MeganSkerry @MassGovernor @GilletteStadium https://www.wsj.com/articles/europes-schools-are-closing-again-on-concerns-they-spread-covid-19-11610805601

Reply on Twitter 1352672694005862407Retweet on Twitter 13526726940058624071Like on Twitter 1352672694005862407Twitter 1352672694005862407
NancyEBailey1Nancy E. Bailey@NancyEBailey1·
22 Jan

Well said, and many teachers agree. "I don't think it's safe for me, my students or any of our families to return now." @TeacherArthurG
http://nyceducator.com/2021/01/no-its-not-time-to-open-schools-full.html

Reply on Twitter 1352634267206086657Retweet on Twitter 13526342672060866572Like on Twitter 13526342672060866575Twitter 1352634267206086657
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
DianeRavitchDiane Ravitch@DianeRavitch·
22 Jan

Biden team picks a strong supporter of high-stakes testing, Ian Rosenblum, as Deputy Assistant Secretary for K-12. He never was a teacher. https://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/contributors/2018/04/04/state-test-results-standards/486814002/
Is Biden breaking his promise to reduce insane testing regime?

Reply on Twitter 1352617668055068672Retweet on Twitter 135261766805506867240Like on Twitter 135261766805506867243Twitter 1352617668055068672
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 Digital Learning dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading Reading Instruction recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2021 Nancy E. Bailey · Web Design by HNH Marketing.