Forty years ago, Americans learned of A Nation at Risk, the troubling and mostly bogus report by the Reagan administration claiming public schools and teachers failed to produce students who were capable American workers.
Berliner’s and Biddle’s The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools disproved the report, but it still haunts us today like a never-ending loop Americans can’t jump off of.
Here’s how. It directly or indirectly…
-
disgraces America’s students, parents, and teachers by obsessing over questionable high-stakes standardized tests that make students look like they failed.
-
remakes schools to focus on corporate and not student needs and drives children as young as middle school to focus on career choice.
-
removes teacher autonomy, driving great teachers out of the classroom, ignoring their professionalism, seeking cheaper replacements, and never paying them what they’re worth.
-
unnecessarily makes U.S. education look substandard to other countries despite America’s students being some of the most innovative in the world (Baeder, 2012).
-
ignores student individuality and strengths, driving the idea that all students must master the same standards and learn the same way, or they have failed.
-
overly focuses on reading and math, removes the arts from poor schools, or relies on outside nonprofits for some art for lucky schools, and, gives little attention to geography, history, science, civics, etc.,
-
leads to defunding schools with Americans who have come to believe that we throw money at public schools, without understanding how schools are funded or who gets school funds.
-
creates an overreliance on business partnerships and social impact bonds, and opens the door to the business roundtable and groups like the Chamber of Commerce critical of public schools (Bridwell-Michell, 2019).
-
raises academic expectations, ignoring what’s been learned about child development, even for the youngest learners in preschool and kindergarten. making them fail, and focuses on a tougher preschool instead of good, affordable, and available childcare for all.
-
overemphasizes homework, often busy work, even for young children, carrying cumbersome back packs, though research shows it isn’t necessary.
-
gives little attention to the kinds of curriculum needed by students with high intelligence, or their identification especially if they’re poor, instead gives them lackluster pull-out programs that don’t address a child’s individual needs.
-
reduces or eliminates recess and adds more schoolwork, ignoring the importance of unstructured play to learning, creating nonprofits to charge schools for teaching children how to play.
-
continues to keep students segregated, and highlights student differences in whatever form as to maintain separateness, but highlights equity talk.
-
drives negative “must fix it” policy apparent in titles: No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, Every Student Succeeds Act, and Raise the Bar: Lead the World campaign.
-
turns high school over to a standardized, substandard profiting
-
makes unrealistic and unkept promises destined to fail, like stating that all children will read by 2014, implying that school reformers have found the secret sauce for learning, but they never do.
-
drives a public school failure narrative in the media, with repeated calls for closing the gap, often ignoring social problems, and the effects of poverty on learning.
-
tracks student data for commercial purposes and for future career profiling, while heavily relying on costly and unproven resources from outside companies.
-
lacks school building upkeep, sometimes resulting in dangerous exposure like asbestos and lead exposure while building new schools that focus on technology, not teachers.
-
ignores unmanageable class sizes or how to improve teacher conditions, and also does little to address school safety.
-
gives leadership positions to those without good qualifications because they will work to disrupt schools and create privatized school districts.
-
drives the IDEA reauthorization changes, eliminating special education services, and remaking special education teacher education to defund special education altogether.
-
creates a rift between teachers and parents to drive parents to seek unproven charters or vouchers, with unfair and unproven promises that this will be better.
-
reduces concern for collectively caring for all children, dividing rich and poor students, and increasing the gap that’s supposed to be eliminated.
-
emphasizes the same objectives for all children while pretending to promote differentiation and Individual Educational Plans.
-
unfairly evaluates teachers and blames them for poor student performance based on questionable high-stakes standardized test scores.
-
promotes the idea that teacher degrees don’t make a difference, that they and their university education schools fail, and many corporations highlight groups like Teach for America trained for five weeks.
-
drives the educational ideas of billionaires, individuals with no teaching background, sought after to fund programs, without having to pay a fair share of taxes.
-
works to destroy or change the face of school boards for privatization by coordinating who is placed on the board, stealing the voice of the people.
-
disrupts instruction and school programming with the promises of unproven technology, ultimately replacing teachers (Christensen et al, 2010).
-
permits, even promotes, harmful and unnecessary retention on a massive scale, which is known to create dropouts, and which goes far to drive parents out of public schools.
-
does little to hire more support staff like counselors, school nurses or school psychologists to address the real mental health needs of children (St. George, 2023).
-
removes school libraries and librarians, especially in poor schools, ignoring the research showing their importance, while emphasizing that children continue to do poorly learning to read.
-
opens the door to costly, unaccountable charters run by business people and not teachers, which involved the original plan of charter school creator Ray Budde.
-
destroys Separation of Church and State, permitting religious schools to obtain vouchers, and some charters are created by religious groups (Meckler & Natanson, 2023).
-
over emphasizes character training or social-emotional learning collecting sensitive data.
-
closes traditional public or charter schools, driving students into overcrowded situations, or abruptly closes charter schools disrupting student learning.
-
overly emphasizes technology pushing programs on school districts even for young children with little proof these programs work.
-
ignites the reading wars with the idea that there’s a crisis, and opens doors for corporations to replace teachers with technology.
-
fails to evaluate questionable Common Core State Standards, welcoming the ideas of outside Think Tanks run by people without education experience or study.
-
turns higher education into a business and makes it unaffordable, and permits politicians to conveniently ignore important education topics.
We need to finally move away from the repetitive negative rhetoric of A Nation at Risk.
References
Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J., (1995). The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Baeder, J. (2012, Oct. 22) Why U.S. schools are simply the best. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/education/opinion-why-u-s-schools-are-simply-the-best/2012/10
Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2019). Them that’s got?: How school partnerships can perpetuate inequalities. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(8), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719846886
Christensen, C., Johnson, C., and Horn, M. (2010). Disrupting Class, Expanded Edition: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. New York: McGraw Hill.
St. George, D. (2019, August 31). In a crisis, schools are 100,000 mental health staff short. The Washington Post, Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/08/31/mental-health-crisis-students-have-third-therapists-they-need/
Meckler, L. & Natanson, H. (2023, February 8). More states are paying to send children to private and religious schools. The Washington Post, Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/02/08/school-choice-vouchers-private-religious-school-huckabee-sanders/
Adele Abrahamse Roof says
This is a wonderful analysis. I have sent it on to my daughter to consider for her two young children.
Nancy Bailey says
Thank you, Adele.
Paul "Pat" Eck says
Wonderful post, Nancy! The Oregon Public Education Network (OPEN) hosted two presentations by Dr. Berliner before the pandemic. He was interviewed by two radio stations KXRY and KBOO. Berliner’s books help guide our advocacy work.
I remember the last statement Berliner made to me, “Pat you know we are losing.” What he meant was we are losing our public schools.
Time is of the essence. We need a manifesto similar to the Leap Manifesto on climate change created in part by Naomi Klein. A succinct statement that public school advocates could rally around throughout the nation.
We need to rally rural, suburban and urban citizens to the cause before it is too late.
Nancy Bailey says
Wonderful! I always look forward to any of his papers or books, and The Manufactured Crisis is still important after all these years! His writings are always so easy to understand and relevant.
Thanks, Pat.
Karen A says
Thank you for you for your insightful list of misguided attempts to support Reagan’s false narrative about public education in this country. My grandson is in 8th grade in Texas. He has ADD, but he is bright. Last year he did well on the STARR test given at the end of the year in Texas. He will be moving to the high school next year. The school informed my daughter that he is eligible to to go to community college next year instead of attending high school. Knowing how immature my grandson is, my daughter and I soundly rejected the proposal. He is immature and not self-directed. He would be a “fish out of water” in a community college. He needs to mature and develop better work habits before he heads to any institution of higher learning, including community college. While this example is not exactly the AP push #15 on the list, it is a similar proposal to jump start academics at an earlier age. He needs time to figure himself out, and high school will give him that time.
Nancy Bailey says
I applaud your decision not to send your new high-schooler to community college! It was a wise choice, as some parents would be misled into thinking it great to push their bright students to do more challenging work at a faster rate. The pressure on children to do this is greater than ever, and you’re correct that often, bright students may be immature and need to learn to improve their social skills. High school, with all its ups and downs, is a place to do this. Helping him to find extracurricular activities and enjoy being a kid is a better ticket. Also, helping him hone in on what he likes to do, possibly for a future career, is a part of high school. He’ll have more well-rounded skills by his senior year than if he jumped to community college.
So, good going, and best of luck, Karen! Thanks for sharing, as this is a new wave of pushiness across the country.
Rick says
Overemphasis on improving test scores now pressures students to work for teachers, administrators and BOEs. Reversing the roles like this a dereliction of duty. on the part of adults. We should all be ashamed to have played a part in this madness.
Nancy Bailey says
I so agree. And it’s worse than ever. It’s stunning how much data is collected on children now in the name of information.
Paul Bonner says
It’s interesting that those in the top ten percent in wealth aspire to attend elite schools that trumpet the liberal arts while many in that income strata simply promote vocational programs for everyone else. many off the Ivy Leaguer Republicans in Washington just want to keep the Enlightenment to themselves.
Nancy Bailey says
And they need others to serve them and meet their needs I guess. The great divide between rich and poor is a huge concern and it’s drastically reflected in our public schools. Thanks, Paul! Interesting comment.