The lack of breaks for children and the misrepresentation of what constitutes recess continues to flourish.
School reformers try unsuccessfully to replace recess. But recess is not Playworks, Phys.Ed., meditation, or Brain Breaks controlled by adults who tell children what to do, denying them the ability to learn academic and social skills that recess provides when children are free to learn.
Recess is unstructured play. It’s supervised (supervision is critical) but not controlled by adults. It’s one of the easiest and inexpensive ways to help children flourish in school, and studies have highlighted its importance.
Removing recess from the school day involved one of the terrible school reforms in the ’90s connected to high-stakes standardized tests, with the bizarre belief (see A Nation at Risk) that children need more classwork without breaks.
After a while, adults realized the severe health problems that could arise if children don’t have breaks. Still, now they focus on physical activity and need to understand the significance of the critical social interactions children learn during recess.
In some places like Florida, parents have had to fight for a recess mandate, where they are always at risk of losing even 20 minutes of recess. Fortunately, the legislature allowed 20 minutes for now!
Recess involves unstructured play. As Mr. Rogers said, Play is often talked about as if it were a relief from serious learning. But for children, play is serious learning. Play is the work of childhood.
Conflict resolution and working out difficulties are critical parts of recess and another critical variable involving what children learn with unstructured play.
Playworks
The Pulse’s reporter Grant Hill, a Philadelphia NPR/PBS station, recently reviewed recess and its role in conflict resolution, especially after COVID-19. In Getting Better at Resolving Conflict, the recess discussions are at the end, and Hill covers recess’s importance. I get a short spot criticizing Playworks. The CEO misinterprets what recess involves and seems not to understand the impact of controlling what children do. This is not actual recess.
Playworks is a nonprofit run by volunteers from Americorps. It cashes in with donations from various outside corporations, people who likely confuse actual recess with an organized version of what is like Phys. Ed.
If charitable organizations were looking to assist with play and actual recess, they’d seek out poor schools with lousy playgrounds and fund those or find a way to offer children actual recess.
It’s also insulting to hear volunteers in a nonprofit getting donations and tax dollars say one of their purposes is to show teachers the importance of play. If Americorps volunteers want to work with children, they might consider becoming teachers.
Playworks is not alone in skewing the meaning of recess. Recess has been replaced with other inadequate substitutes like Phys. Ed., meditation, and Brain Breaks. Some classes have children sitting on bouncy balls, thinking that nonstop balancing keeps them on their toes!
Phys. Ed.
Teachers prepare in college for physical education, studying kinesiology, physiology, physical therapy, nutrition and health, weight control, and more, and Phys. Ed is important, but it is a regular class and not a break from studying. It is not recess.
SHAPE America is another nonprofit that seems like Phys. Ed. It isn’t recess.
Meditation
Meditation may be helpful to those who need to quiet their minds, but a recent UK study claims it wasn’t beneficial for children and might be harmful. Meditation is unrelated to recess, where children mingle with other children and learn social skills.
Brain Breaks
Teachers know all kinds of methods that give children quick breaks from learning, but no matter what they are, they are not recess.
If you are older, think back. Recess once included a break before school started if students got to school early, a midmorning break, a lunch break, and a mid-afternoon break. Breaks often occurred in winter when students had to dress prepared but returned to class ready to learn! While recess involved supervision, children were permitted to play without interference unless they misbehaved or were in danger of getting hurt.
Recess is a messy business; children sometimes react differently than adults expect. Still, unless they’re bullying, being bullied, or in physical danger, they should be able to work out their differences.
Teachers learn much about students by observing how they act at recess, how they play with others, or whether children need to step away from the fray. They can help students after recess or step in if there is conflict to help children better understand each other.
When adults refuse to allow children unstructured recess breaks during the day, if they always control what children do, they show children they don’t trust them. Children can navigate and master the following skills on their own terms without adult interference.
They need to learn from their classmates that X’s behavior brings about Y’s reaction. It is less meaningful when adults lecture them about how to behave and force them to follow their orders.
With unstructured recess children learn how to:
- actively listen to learn how others feel.
- be polite and learn how to gain acceptance.
- accept others.
- accommodate other children.
- avoid off-putting behaviors.
- collaborate to work out problems.
- communicate to speak, be heard, or listen (not interrupt).
- compete figuring out what it means to win or lose.
- compromise to give to get.
- create their games and play innovations.
- follow rules on their own.
- take turns so everyone has a chance to play.
- rest away from interactions and school work.
It’s only through recess, where children are supervised but enjoy unstructured play, that they learn the essential skills that come with thinking and working independently.
If adults tell students how to do the above it’s less meaningful, because everything is worked out for them.
Teachers, paraprofessionals, or parent volunteers who understand recess and all there is to learn about it should carefully watch and supervise children on the side so they can ensure that no one gets hurt.
They should also consider it an honor if children ask them to join in. Children’s joy is seeing their teacher trusting them to make choices.
Teachers can glean valuable information about children and how they play, and they can work to connect children after recess in the class setting and hear what children have to say about their play adventures.
Playworks, Phys. Ed., mindfulness meditation, and brain breaks are not recess, no matter what anyone says. They are being used to replace unstructured play and sometimes privatize public education.
Christine Langhoff says
Lately my local NPR radio station has spots for AmeriCorps, and I cannot stop gritting my teeth. I don’t recall the wording, but the message overall is that these volunteers are fixing everything those teachers in urban areas can’t handle. GRRRRR.
Certainly an appealing message to the suburbanite contributors who would never tolerate amateurs for their offspring.
Nancy Bailey says
Yes, Very true, Christine. They support Teach for America. The Playworks message is also rather anti-recess or at least recess in its truest definition.
Adele Abrahamse Roof says
What a wise and wonderful perspective!
Nancy Bailey says
Thanks, Adele.
Paul Bonner says
While a student, I came to the conclusion that learning is about joy. Through encounters with Maslow’s sense of self actualization and later through Sidharta, I understood that to find the best of me I had to be willing to explore. This was all reinforced when I later read “The Book of Joy” by the Dalai Lama and Desmond Tutu. This sometimes challenged any sense of self discipline, but I have continuously worked at bringing focus in line with the wonders I encounter in this life. One of my struggles in education has always been infusing this sense of joy into a school where the overriding structure presupposes compliance as a priority. As an art teacher I wanted students to have a freedom to explore their creativity without a chaotic environment. As a principal, I encouraged teachers to establish pedagogy that provided students opportunities to explore their curiosity. In the culture of school, this is often considered too risky. In schools of significant under-privilege we tend to believe that those students need hyper structure. My experience dealing with the education establishment was that everything had to be programmed, not especially because this is the best way for students to learn, but because it was believed any opportunity for student choice provided fodder for misbehavior. As an elementary student in the 1960s, I had 15 minutes of recess in the morning and 30 minutes in the afternoon. I believe that my eventual academic curiosity came from that playtime with other successful students . It was true free time. Later as an educator, I often considered it counter intuitive that “time on task” became the mantra because this hindered student motivation to learn. Recess is critical. Learning should be about wonder, not simply function.
Nancy Bailey says
I agree! Several Science of Reading advocates claimed on Twitter (X) that teachers should focus on teaching the mechanics of reading and quit trying to make reading fun. I don’t like arguing there. Rarely are minds changed, and it becomes an echo chamber and a waste of time, but I couldn’t disagree with that idea more and will likely write about it eventually to voice concern.
You’re right; children learn better when they feel like there’s a chance for success, especially if they’re interested and excited about the material. They’ll likely be up for a challenge if they’re interested, even if it is tough material to learn. I remember chemistry class. Difficult for me but I found it interesting and worked hard to understand it, especially balancing equations.
Your description of recess reflects mine. I especially remember the games children controlled or made up and several times asking the teacher to join in.
Thanks, Paul.
Brian says
“Several Science of Reading advocates claimed on Twitter (X) that teachers should focus on teaching the mechanics of reading and quit trying to make reading fun.”
I can’t speak for others, but as a parent who saw balanced literacy (Units of Study) in action at home, as an in-class volunteer, and over Zoom during the pandemic, this does not reflect the concerns I, and others, have expressed.
My concern is that reading is not fun if you do not know how to do it, and that exercises such as independent reading time and silent reading do not build the skills children need to access texts.
Separately, as a professional writer and editor at a Fortune 500 corporation and a former journalist at national magazines, I have serious concerns about the writing portion of Units of Study, but that’s a separate issue.
Nancy Bailey says
You can teach reading and also make it enjoyable. It doesn’t have to be one or the other. If you see that as balanced, then so be it.
Brian says
Nope.