• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Could it End High-Stakes Testing?—The Bizarre Practice of Irrelevant Testing of Students with Severe Disabilities

March 4, 2014 By Nancy Bailey Leave a Comment

Post Views: 8

Could the odd practice of using high-stakes testing to test students with severe disabilities put an end to America’s obsession with high-stakes testing overall?

There is nothing that speaks to individual differences more than students like Ethan Rediske.

America may have lost Ethan, but his mom, Andrea Rediske, and Orange County Public School board member Rick Roach will not go gently into the good night when it comes to the outrageous testing of students with severe disabilities. And other states—not just Florida—are listening.

I think that the impact this issue could have on high-stakes testing, not just for students with severe disabilities, but testing in general, is the real reason behind FL Commissioner of Education Pam Stewart’s odd letter. It is defensive, to be sure, but it also sends a message. Note: every teacher in the state received the letter.

Let me say upfront, unlike a lot of state education commissioners, who have little background or experience in education, Stewart is tougher to criticize. She has been a real teacher, and she has admirable degrees in both education and counseling. You would think she would have understood this situation better.

Also, in the ‘80s I spent time as an intern in the FL Bureau of Education for Exceptional Students, and I have a bit of a warm spot for the good people who worked there. But of course that was then and this is now.

Standardized testing has been used for years to damn teachers and public schools. More-and-more students with disabilities must master tests that take time away from the skills they need. There are better methods to help these children—and measure their progress.

Stewart’s letter reeks with what would seem to be poor judgment. I’m not just talking about the lack of sympathy for Ethan’s mom, Andrea Rediske. Certainly, knocking a mother after the loss of her son is pretty low.

But the generalized thinking as to why it is a good thing that children with severe disabilities are tested with, what many believe irrelevant assessment, is the issue that needs exploring.

Stewart doesn’t want the public to get a bad overall view of the importance of testing.

She prattles on in her letter about “equal rights” and “reaching measurable goals.” But equality isn’t about making all children be the same. Equality can mean a lot of different things. I’m thinking good school buildings and resources, but you can come up with a list of your own.

And measurable goals don’t have to be the same either. Parents want schools that value their children for the children they are—no matter the disabilities—strengths and weaknesses.

Stewart says, “We cannot and should not return to the days where we tacitly ignore children with special needs by failing to ensure they are learning and growing as the result of teachers’ excellent work.”

What days and which teachers is she referring too?

There certainly was a time when students with disabilities were treated poorly. But with the advent of Public Law 94-142, in 1975, that changed. Across this country a new awareness drove public schools to address the “individual” needs of students in special education, despite the fact that many politicians argued about the cost.

And despite the fact too, that there have been many attempts throughout the years to weaken the bill with watered down re-authorizations that turned it into the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that it is today.

I taught in Florida, early on, during the great changes, and I can vouch that, despite rapid growth and a lot of scrambling to better understand students with severe disabilities and students with autism, special education teachers were by no means “tacitly ignoring” children. Mrs. Stewart might want to read up on the history of the Gretchen Everhart School, on her doorstep in Tallahassee, or revisit the ESEA, Title VI-B Project for students with Autism in Orange County.

No. I think the problem Stewart and other reformers have is special education. Reformers are well aware that there is a cool wind of discontent blowing across the country when it comes to high-stakes testing and Common Core State Standards. Ethan’s strange situation with high-stakes testing just drove home that the serious problems in education may not be with the public schools and/or their teachers, but with the draconian, inflexible, disingenuous and outlandish rules that govern them.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Andrea Rediske, assessment, Common Core, Florida Deparment of Education, high-stakes testing, irrelevant testing, Mrs. Pamela Stewart, Rick Roach, special education, students with severe disabilities

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

SPED Teacher, Author, PhD Ed. Leadership, Blogging for Kids, and Democratic Public Schools that should belong to all of us.

Nancy E. Bailey
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
NancyEBailey1Nancy E. Bailey@NancyEBailey1·
16h

@PennBat I worry that many students with disabilities will miss out on inclusion classes with their non-disabled peers with vouchers. The best they will find are segregated charters or private schools that only focus on the disability.

Reply on Twitter 1527060376814231556Retweet on Twitter 152706037681423155610Like on Twitter 152706037681423155616Twitter 1527060376814231556
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
PennBatPA BATs R Pro Charter Reform@PennBat·
17h

1. You lost
2. Where are the Special Ed students supposed to go when all the public schools are gone and voucher schools won't accept them?

"School Choice" isn't for ALL kids. Anyone who says it is, is full of 💩 https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1513571301155348481

Corey A. DeAngelis@DeAngelisCorey

@RepKrajewski the money doesn't belong to the government schools.

education funding is meant for educating children, not for protecting a particular institution.

we should fund students, not systems.

Reply on Twitter 1527046639420157952Retweet on Twitter 15270466394201579526Like on Twitter 152704663942015795212Twitter 1527046639420157952
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
NancyEBailey1Nancy E. Bailey@NancyEBailey1·
18h

@SecCardona There's a place for technology. It's important. But so are teachers and a child's privacy. I wonder if you're paying attention to this, @SecCardona. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2022/05/18/algorithmic-personalization-is-disrupting-a-healthy-teaching-environment/

Reply on Twitter 1527030057138540550Retweet on Twitter 15270300571385405503Like on Twitter 15270300571385405508Twitter 1527030057138540550
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
molly_esqMolly Esquivel@molly_esq·
20h

To prepare for @linakhanFTC discussion on #COPPA @Velislava777 and I shed light on the sidelining of #teachers and the soft power edtech wields in the classrooms. This is just the beginning. #edutwitter #edtech
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2022/05/18/algorithmic-personalization-is-disrupting-a-healthy-teaching-environment/

Reply on Twitter 1526993780649340928Retweet on Twitter 15269937806493409285Like on Twitter 152699378064934092810Twitter 1526993780649340928
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
NancyEBailey1Nancy E. Bailey@NancyEBailey1·
17 May

Here are words & phrases indicating a change from public schools & teaching to all-tech instruction. https://nancyebailey.com/2022/05/17/6-terms-transforming-public-schools-to-the-all-tech-endgame/

Reply on Twitter 1526613914401775619Retweet on Twitter 15266139144017756193Like on Twitter 15266139144017756193Twitter 1526613914401775619
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2022 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.