• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Can We Afford to Lay Off Public School Guidance Counselors?

May 26, 2014 By Nancy Bailey Leave a Comment

Is there a movement to lay off guidance counselors, even college and career counselors, in public schools? With the “everyone should attend college” movement, you wouldn’t think so. In fact, the need would seem to be to hire more counselors. Still, there are signs…. See here in Michigan for example. Or here in California. Or here.

I’ve been watching the “dump the counselors” phenomenon for several years. Like “dump the librarians” and “dump the school nurses” and, of course, “dump the teachers,” dumping the counselor is another notch on the privatization belt. The attempt seems to be to run schools like they are a skeletal shell—no specialists at all—or completely online—that’s the trend.

Guidance counselors are often some of the first to go when there are school budget cuts.

The Gates Foundation and a group called the Public Agenda did their own study of school counselors. They implied the focus should be more on counselors to assist the many students planning on college. I could no longer find mention of that study on the Public Agenda website. But HERE is a description of it. Was this study peer reviewed?

It is stunning really, that with all the problems facing students and society today, this study gives short shrift to the importance of the emotional needs of students.

The actual report (here) is entitled, “Can I Get a Little Advice Here? How an Overstretched Guidance System is Undermining Students’ College Aspirations.” Much of it is critical of counseling services based on questioning 22-30 year olds.

They also point to the fact that counselors really are “overstretched” and that their socio-behavioral counseling isn’t valued. The results indicate that past high school students didn’t connect favorably with their guidance counselors and thought of themselves as “faces in the crowd.”

But they go on to just criticize counselors as not being effective.

Well with a student counselor ration of 250:1, or as the study itself notes, sometimes 1,000:1, what would anyone expect?

Yet, despite those huge ratios, here is a California collection of research studies describing counselors as still being effective! See here. This is a synopsis of some of the serious issues guidance counselors address:

·    Peer mediation
·    Family problems
·    Bullying
·    Cheating
·    Abuse
·    Depression
·    Suicide prevention
·    Grief counseling
·    Cheating
·    Homelessness
·    Parental job loss
·    Parent education
·    Assessment
·    Psychological Testing Coordination
·    Violence prevention
·    Transitioning to high school
·    Transitioning to college
·    Special Education
·    Social skills
·    College placement
·    Scholarships
·    Vocational
·    Career-Technical
·    Connecting students to outside services

But even college and career counseling, which you would think the Gates Foundation would support, is in trouble. All those students are pushed to attend college, but what assistance do they get?

Wealthier students have access to outside privatized counseling services. It is debatable how good these services are because there is little if any regulation.

For poorer students it looks like the push is to privatize these services and go about it in a way to dismiss actual guidance counselors. The study mentioned above notes there needs to be a different arrangement for counselors, but they don’t recommend increasing the number of counselors. To me, that is the only real solution.

They imply what’s needed is some kind of eHarmony.com kind of set-up (I don’t understand this) or that higher ed., business and local civic groups should come to the rescue. And how would that work?

Perhaps we get a glimpse here (for those with Ed. Week subscriptions). Recently Ed Week reported that West Virginia has a new pilot program to prompt high school seniors and recent graduates about deadlines for matters surrounding college attendance at the end of their senior year and throughout the summer after high school.

RU  registered yet? Do you have your financial aid apps. turned in? Ready for student orientation? Time for a counselor visit?

At first I thought this would be helpful for students with attention difficulties and even students without such problems. Teens by their very nature can be forgetful in today’s high-stressed world. I still think there may be a place for this program, though some will probably say it coddles students.

But how good are these services for students who need real help?

I asked myself, is there something else going on here? Is this a sneaky way to cut costs? Sure enough. This is a program for low income students. It is considered cost-effective for the students who have less “academic-year access to quality college counseling or information.” See here.

Is this program (economically it costs $7.00 per student) a way to dismiss the need for guidance counselors? The senior year is, after all, an important time for students to discuss their plans and the guidance counselor spends a huge amount of time steering individuals towards scholarships and even the right schools.

I think what students need today at the high school level are two kinds of counselors.

College and Career Counselors should be adroitly prepared to study and understand the job market and likewise learn of the interests of students and their strengths and weaknesses. They should be able to counsel high school students and their families on how to transition into college—what is affordable and how to obtain scholarships. They can also assist students with on-the-job training and coordinating important education opportunities with community businesses.

Socio-Behavioral Counselors are critically important to guide students in the right direction. To foster prevention in keeping a school safe, and to assist students through trauma, be it divorce, homelessness, bullying, and any and all difficulties in school. They can help students and their families find outside services too, when the problems are so severe other professionals are required.

In addition, counselors should be given some relief for their roles as assessment managers. And the burden of Common Core State Standards should not fall on their backs either. They have more important things to do.

But one thing is for certain, a school without counselors, or with too few counselors, is unimaginable in today’s academic and socio-emotional climate.

Adams, Caralee J. “‘R U on Track for College?’ Texting a New Strategy.” Education Week. May 13, 2014.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, College and Career Counselors, Common Core, Guidance Counselors, Socio-Behavioral Difficulties, The Public Agenda

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Books

front cover

NEW BOOK!
An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. BaileyFollow

Nancy E. Bailey
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
EricCeresaEric Ceresa@EricCeresa·
16h

@clay_mcch @NancyEBailey1 This is an excellent argument for raising teachers' pay, not any sort of argument against a $15 min wage. And raising the min wage DOES raise wages for workers near the minimum. We just don't usually think about the fact that teachers fit that definition.

Reply on Twitter 1350263323212787712Retweet on Twitter 13502633232127877121Like on Twitter 13502633232127877122Twitter 1350263323212787712
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
tulticanThomas Ultican@tultican·
17h

Charter Schools Are Killing Saint Louis Public. The City Is Nailing The Coffin Shut. by Lexi Perez Lane https://link.medium.com/8taMmwG44cb

Reply on Twitter 1350253072686018562Retweet on Twitter 13502530726860185621Like on Twitter 13502530726860185621Twitter 1350253072686018562
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
clay_mcchClay McChristian@clay_mcch·
15 Jan

So Biden’s $15 minimum wage comes out to $31,200 a year for a 40 hour work week. The starting salary for a beginning teacher in Texas is $33,660. So a person working a minimum wage job will be making almost the same as a teacher with a college degree. Does this make any sense? 🤷‍♂️

Reply on Twitter 1349914993114886146Retweet on Twitter 134991499311488614612298Like on Twitter 134991499311488614668928Twitter 1349914993114886146
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
chicagospedpacChicago SpedPac@chicagospedpac·
20h

.@ChiPubSchools can you tell us how many specIal educators were forced to resign this week due to your policy of not accommodating remote instruction? Break it down by SpEd teachers, SECAs and clinicians

Reply on Twitter 1350211361498927110Retweet on Twitter 135021136149892711019Like on Twitter 135021136149892711081Twitter 1350211361498927110
Retweet on TwitterNancy E. Bailey Retweeted
susanohaSusan Ohanian@susanoha·
23h

The authors consider the ways in which educational responses to COVID19 exemplify opportunistic disaster
capitalism.
Disaster Capitalism, Rampant EdTech
Opportunism, and the Advancement of
Online Learning in the Era of COVID19
https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/issue/current

Reply on Twitter 1350167077487861761Retweet on Twitter 13501670774878617611Like on Twitter 1350167077487861761Twitter 1350167077487861761
Load More...

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 Digital Learning dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos high-stakes testing inclusion kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading Reading Instruction recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2021 Nancy E. Bailey · Web Design by HNH Marketing.