• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Recess v. Online Social-Emotional Learning

March 13, 2016 By Nancy Bailey 4 Comments

Post Views: 1,016

Education Week is reporting about technology to be used to teach social-emotional skills. It’s called Social-Emotional Learning–SEL for short.

I find it ironic that at the same time, Florida senators just said no to recess. Are they telling us that computers should be used to teach students how to relate to one another?

Is this the wave of the future? It sounds to me like a futuristic movie with a bad rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

Yet the World Economic Forum and the Boston Consulting Group are plugging measurable competencies and character traits they believe important, and the only way they want you to think children will get these skills is online.

Here is the World Economic Forum’s “New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning Through Technology”.

The Boston Consulting Group can be found here pushing SEL. “How Education Technology Can Help Foster Social and Emotional Skills.”

Technology “can personalize learning, engage the disengaged, complement what happens in the classroom, extend education outside the classroom, and provide access to learning to students,”

…but “the number of [social-emotional learning] products in the ed-tech market today is insufficient.”

That’s right. They want more ed. tech for social-emotional learning.

Most of us argue that technology cannot take over a classroom, or replace a teacher, especially because of the social interactions that take place there.

While online instruction might provide some learning, mostly rote, children need social-emotional relationships. They need to mingle with other students. That’s hard to do when you are sitting alone at a computer.

Even if a child connects with another child (some aren’t real kids) online, it isn’t the same as a real relationship. The best place for young children to socialize is recess!

We all know that watching children play can tell teachers and parents a lot. By observing social interactions that occur during recess, teachers determine when to intervene, and when to let children work out their problems.

Working out issues is an important socialization skill that is lost when children are micro-managed with harsh discipline, or when they are told about good behavior but not given opportunities to demonstrate it.

For what’s really useful—look at the children themselves and how they play.

For example, in his book Recess: Its Role in Education and Development, Anthony Pellegrini describes rough and tumble play (R&T). This kind of interaction might present itself as aggression, but there are nuanced differences important for teachers to identify.

R&T is typically composed of run, chase, flee, wrestle, and open-hand hit. Aggression is typified by closed-hand hits, shoves, pushes, and kicks. Also a quite simple, yet reliable, way in which R&T and aggression differ is in terms of expression of affect. Generally, smiles (or a play face) accompany R&T, whereas frowns, or crying accompany aggression (p. 101). 

Children certainly can learn good behavior by hearing teachers or parents tell them what good behavior is, and they especially learn by modeling adult behavior—as most parents can attest.

But unless they have a chance to practice behavior it’s all for naught! Children learn best by doing, not sitting in front of a computer screen!

Managing social interactions through technology, however, looks to be on the horizon. Fifty-five characteristics have been chosen, like encouraging turn-taking, adopting different perspectives through role-playing, and developing “grit” through rankings and leader boards.

Children are to learn to regulate their emotions through online instruction. And if that’s not scary, there’s this:

… futuristic technologies such as wearable devices that track students’ emotional states and physiological reactions to stress,  for example, or virtual reality systems that can simulate physical environments and “foster greater self-awareness and spur creativity,” are also important for “expanding the realm of the possible,” the report says.

What parent needs a tracking device to tell them how much stress their child is experiencing?

Does anyone really believe an online presence from 9 to 5 will help a child learn social skills? Most parents want to limit screen time not expand it!

Along with this, in general, serious questions are being raised as to the harmful effects of too much technology on young children.

Children learn best by doing not viewing. 

References

Herold, Benjamin. “‘Social-Emotional Learning; a Ripe Market for Ed Tech, Report Contends.” Education Week. March 11, 2016.

Pellegrini, Anthony D. Recess: Its Role in Education and Development. (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2005) p. 101.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Boston Consulting Group, Ed. Tech, Every Student Succeeds Act, Online Social-Emotional Learning, recess, Technology, World Economic Forum

Comments

  1. Sheila Resseger says

    March 13, 2016 at 1:06 pm

    This chills me to the bone. It’s reprehensible that the edupreneurs that are making all of these plans evidently have no sense of the nature of the human species or what human beings need to thrive–face-to-face social interactions, meaningful engagement, compassion, and encouragement of their creative spark. We cannot allow technocracy to dictate children’s fate. We cannot tolerate a technocratic society in which human aspirations and inspiration are subordinated to global corporate interests. I honestly do not think that fascism is too strong a term to use here.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      March 13, 2016 at 2:06 pm

      I am encouraged, Sheila, that many teachers and parents understand what’s happening. I feel some positive changes in the air.

      But didn’t mean to sound so cheery. It really is a worrisome issue. It is hard to understand how it can be happening. Thanks, Sheila.

      Reply
  2. Barbara Stratton says

    March 13, 2016 at 5:56 pm

    Snark alert! We’ve been using technology for social skills for decades now. My students with ASD have been watching cartoons obsessively for years, because what harm can it do and it helps them be independent– they seem to think that Family Guy and the Simpsons really are worth emulating. Please just let me teach human beings in human ways.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      March 13, 2016 at 6:37 pm

      If your students are all like Bart that’s a problem…but Lisa is a dream child! Ha! Thanks, Barbara, your point is well taken!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
18h

Things to ponder about the current discussions around SOR. From ChatGPT @ChatwithGPT
https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/?fbclid=IwAR0Fhkczq46nJq8n5ob1q2xF5Q9aFc9ya04TEgYCaVTyEElEQg_UbWfoROY

Reply on Twitter 1637853806833590275 Retweet on Twitter 1637853806833590275 7 Like on Twitter 1637853806833590275 24 Twitter 1637853806833590275
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
19 Mar

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 18 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 46 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
deguire_mike Mike DeGuire, Ph. D. @deguire_mike ·
12h

"The privatization movement has been strategically designed...by billionaires and their fellow investors for specific purposes: to lower their own tax burden, and ideologically to dismantle public education." @NPEaction @NancyEBailey1 @TheAndySpears
https://medium.com/@jfiske80/billionaires-and-their-investors-are-impacting-education-policies-in-colorado-and-especially-in-c523579674af

Reply on Twitter 1637957759751831558 Retweet on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Like on Twitter 1637957759751831558 9 Twitter 1637957759751831558
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nepctweet NEPC @nepctweet ·
17h

"Let’s honor our students by providing them free quality democratic public schools that reject no one." @NancyEBailey1 https://bit.ly/3FE0KFA

Reply on Twitter 1637870110840094721 Retweet on Twitter 1637870110840094721 3 Like on Twitter 1637870110840094721 2 Twitter 1637870110840094721
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
dianeravitch Diane Ravitch 🇺🇸🇺🇦🌈 @dianeravitch ·
18 Mar

Voucher schools don’t have to comply with IDEA for kids with disabilities. They are allowed to discriminate for any reason or none at all. #schoolschoose https://twitter.com/KatieLikesBikes/status/1636446553429647376

Katie 🌻 @KatieLikesBikes

@Forrest4Trees @GregAbbott_TX No one is reporting that private schools don't have to adhere to the Federal IDEA act. Kids with #disabilities will be further harmed because #publicschools provide important services to #PWD and are essentially having their budgets cut in half by the voucher system.

Reply on Twitter 1637123379458088962 Retweet on Twitter 1637123379458088962 64 Like on Twitter 1637123379458088962 178 Twitter 1637123379458088962
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.