• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Digitally Damning a Student’s Future with Old Data

March 15, 2017 By Nancy Bailey 3 Comments

Post Views: 43

You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don’t try to forget the mistakes, but you don’t dwell on it. You don’t let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.

—Johnny Cash

Some colleges and universities are now collecting sophisticated data about a student’s past performance and using it for what is called “predictive analysis” which has the potential to stigmatize students and sort them into categories of success or failure.

While this is only happening in a few colleges and universities, my guess is that it’s a matter of time before we see such a program used in the K-12 setting.

Predictive analysis includes past data collected on the student that they might not even know about! It combines all this information together into a report.

The claim is that such information assists in pinpointing problems and steering students in the right direction—to determine if they can do well in college. The catch is that this will only happen if adults with a good background and preparation in understanding this information are there to assist students.

Without the personal human element, such information will only unfairly sort and stigmatize individuals. Students will be labeled failures by a digital program devised by those outside of the child’s life who don’t know the student!

Most teachers like to give new students a clean slate when they enter the classroom. Even if a student has had behavioral or learning difficulties in the past, we still like to believe in positive change, or that a child’s circumstances will improve. Ideally, school professionals working closely with the student hope to impact such positive transformation.

It is also not unusual for students to have slumps in their learning due to temporary problems. Once the problems are behind them, they pick up steam and do perfectly fine in school. Other times, students will benefit from ongoing personal counseling and/or a nurturing classroom that assists them with their struggles. Quite often this will involve students from disadvantaged homes.

But today, school districts are run amuck with data! Testing and behavior information are continuously collected on students. Parents complain about invasive demographic information obtained through troubling surveys given to students without parental permission.

With so much information amassed on students, predictive digital program use in the future is concerning. Also, when digital devices replace qualified teachers and counselors who have studied and understand academic and emotional and behavioral difficulties, how will students solve their problems? Will mistakes be unforgivable? What will all this data mining mean for students as they get older?

If a student experiences an off year because their parents are divorcing, if they struggle with learning disabilities that they later learn to overcome or adapt to, will their future still be in jeopardy? If they act out or get in trouble, but turn their behavior around, will they still be denied a chance at college due to difficulties in the past?

Will the new predictive analysis that micromanages and tracks a child’s every move through data collection turn into the crystal ball of doom?

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Behavioral Data, College Preparation, Data Collection, Data Mining, Demographic Information, Futures of Students, Predictive Analysis, Privacy, Test Data

Comments

  1. jo says

    March 15, 2017 at 4:50 pm

    Thank you Nancy.

    We need to Opt Out of Data Collection, Opt Out of Tech, Opt Out of Common Core, as well as Opt Out of Testing.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      March 15, 2017 at 6:07 pm

      Totally agree, Jo! Thank you!

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. CURMUDGUCATION | Mister Journalism: "Reading, Sharing, Discussing, Learning" says:
    March 19, 2017 at 2:11 pm

    […] Damning a Student’s Future with Old Data […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
11h

The focus should be on lifting traditional public schools & reading programs for many students who attend those schools rather than on unproven private and charter schools. Fix IDEA by increasing options. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619827835786629120 Retweet on Twitter 1619827835786629120 2 Like on Twitter 1619827835786629120 1 Twitter 1619827835786629120
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
arizona_sos Save Our Schools AZ @arizona_sos ·
28 Jan

Special interests call ESA vouchers “scholarships” because private schools select their students. It’s not “school choice,” it’s the school’s choice 😡#AZVoucherWatch #VouchersHurt #FundOurSchools

http://bit.ly/SellingSchoolChoice

Reply on Twitter 1619455283402608640 Retweet on Twitter 1619455283402608640 71 Like on Twitter 1619455283402608640 189 Twitter 1619455283402608640
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
danwuori Dan Wuori @danwuori ·
22h

On-demand standardized testing has no place in kindergarten. There are far more appropriate and meaningful methods of assessing young children. https://twitter.com/reimagschool/status/1619665302450753536

David Locke @ReimagSchool

My wife's Kindergarten students felt very stressed and were crying when they had to take a standardized test. When she reported this to administrators their solution was "test them until they cry, and then stop." #testthemtiltheycry #resisttesting

Reply on Twitter 1619667712833363968 Retweet on Twitter 1619667712833363968 35 Like on Twitter 1619667712833363968 215 Twitter 1619667712833363968
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
drbradjohnson 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐝 𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐧 @drbradjohnson ·
28 Jan

Besides the many issues with standardized testing. Most students have no idea what they missed on the tests and teachers don't either. And by time they get results students have moved on to next grade. Making it useless to evaluate teachers & districts too.

Reply on Twitter 1619322557236404224 Retweet on Twitter 1619322557236404224 567 Like on Twitter 1619322557236404224 4991 Twitter 1619322557236404224
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
ichrislehman Christopher Lehman 🤪 @ichrislehman ·
27 Jan

One of many absurd theories coming out of states like VA is that reading must be taught from a packaged curriculum followed with fidelity.

I have never ever ever worked with a curriculum that didn’t need to be slightly or completely revised to meet the needs of actual students.

Reply on Twitter 1619099950956306432 Retweet on Twitter 1619099950956306432 59 Like on Twitter 1619099950956306432 488 Twitter 1619099950956306432
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.