• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Endrew F., Special Education, and Charter Schools: What’s the Connection?

March 26, 2017 By Nancy Bailey 2 Comments

Post Views: 71

It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

In light of the current administration’s push for school choice in the form of vouchers and charter schools, and the selection of Betsy DeVos to be education secretary, there is concern about the future of public schools and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). How will students who require different learning approaches fit in a world of school privatization?

The Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District ruling gives us hope that students with disabilities must be challenged in their educational program, but it also left many unanswered questions. One I will focus on today.

Why did the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS) and the National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools (NCSECS) file an amicus brief for Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District? Such legal documents are filed by non-litigants with compelling interest in the case. The briefs advise the court. They provide information or arguments the court might want to consider.

Why did they appear giddy after the decision? Here is a tweet from the NCSECS after the ruling was announced:

They say in the brief that they are developing “model charter school legislation” and influencing statutes and regulations in many states. They claim to support research, publications, and advocacy to further the charter school movement. Note-that they said “further the charter school movement”—not children.

Amici submit this brief because we find adoption of a higher standard is the most consistent with the charter school movement’s emphasis on high expectations for all students and its commitment to serving students with disabilities enrolled in charter schools NCSECS and NAPCS Amici also believe the experience of charter schools, reflected in research sheds light on the issue before the court.

And they claim that in charters this is what you will find:

  • Core Knowledge,
  • Montessori,
  • Direct Instruction,
  • Expeditionary Learning,
  • “No Excuses” education, and
  • Multiple Intelligences approaches.

They don’t mention special education teachers. They do emphasize that charters will serve students with mild to moderate disabilities and they promote unique schools.

It is troubling that charter school organizations, known for their lack of services to students with disabilities in the past, are advertising that they should now be seen as a “robust” alternative to public schools. They have not shown proof they are capable of working with students with disabilities—quite the contrary.

After Katrina, when New Orleans was converted to primarily a charter school system, students in need of special education were denied services or mistreated in those schools. The Southern Poverty Law Center sued and the case was closed in 2014, but as of 2016, students in New Orleans are still not getting needed services. Charter schools across the country do not do special education well.

Charter schools are usually not set up to serve children with disabilities. Traditional public schools include an IEP meeting with a variety of professionals who meet with parents to identify student needs and help determine the kind of program that will benefit students. This could consist of a school psychologist, counselor, special education teacher/s, general teacher/s, district staffing specialist,  district special education coordinator, social worker and others. Charters are not set up for this kind of screening and professional involvement.

The good news about Endrew F. v. Douglas County is that it acknowledges that education for students with disabilities should be challenging, but it doesn’t change the precedent of past case law on special education. I think, translated, it redirects attention to the Individual Education Plan and parental rights within public schools.

Chief Justice Roberts said “for children with disabilities, receiving instruction that aims so low would be tantamount to ‘sitting idly … awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.” He quoted from a 1982 Supreme Court precedent on special education, Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley.

Special education advocates and all eight of the Supreme Court justices were rightly troubled by Judge Gorsuch’s past comment on this case that the instruction of students with disabilities be “merely more than de minimus.” Most teachers and those in public schools would argue they don’t look at students with disabilities thinking they will give them a “trivial” education.

What we don’t know is whether special education will be funded better with the decision. Funding was a problem in Douglas County and there seemed to be a decline in services when the court case came about.

Why not work to improve traditional public schools and address the needs of students with disabilities more positively with a variety of services and better funding? It is worrisome to hear about funding cuts to public schools and increased funding to choice (private and charters) under President Trump and Betsy DeVos.

Will charters and private schools push the choice card more aggressively by promising special education services they won’t provide well? Will we see more cuts to special education programs in traditional public schools where IDEA rules?

This country needs to get behind students who learn differently and require something better than “one size fits all.” The best way to do this is to strengthen real public schools by fulfilling the original promise of IDEA, and work closer with parents and students to accommodate student needs.

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: charter schools, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS), National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools (NCSECS), New Orleans, vouchers

Comments

  1. Sheila Resseger says

    March 26, 2017 at 8:00 pm

    When I first heard about this case, I was elated. Now I’m deflated. I’m worried that Nancy’s concerns are warranted. Students with special needs are entitled to and deserve appropriate professional assessments and programs, not arbitrary “high expectations” and “no excuses.”

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      March 26, 2017 at 8:53 pm

      Sheila, thanks, I think most of the case was good, just not these charter groups trying to get involved. I wondered what they’re up to!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
drmaryhoward Dr. Mary Howard @drmaryhoward ·
16h

Nancy Bailey: Reading Disabilities: Focus on Public Schools NOT School Choice!

“It’s unfair to say public school teachers fail to teach reading, while charter schools show substandard results. This creates a double standard.” @NancyEBailey1

https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619829619343106050 Retweet on Twitter 1619829619343106050 1 Like on Twitter 1619829619343106050 2 Twitter 1619829619343106050
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
16h

The focus should be on lifting traditional public schools & reading programs for many students who attend those schools rather than on unproven private and charter schools. Fix IDEA by increasing options. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619827835786629120 Retweet on Twitter 1619827835786629120 2 Like on Twitter 1619827835786629120 1 Twitter 1619827835786629120
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
arizona_sos Save Our Schools AZ @arizona_sos ·
28 Jan

Special interests call ESA vouchers “scholarships” because private schools select their students. It’s not “school choice,” it’s the school’s choice 😡#AZVoucherWatch #VouchersHurt #FundOurSchools

http://bit.ly/SellingSchoolChoice

Reply on Twitter 1619455283402608640 Retweet on Twitter 1619455283402608640 71 Like on Twitter 1619455283402608640 189 Twitter 1619455283402608640
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
danwuori Dan Wuori @danwuori ·
29 Jan

On-demand standardized testing has no place in kindergarten. There are far more appropriate and meaningful methods of assessing young children. https://twitter.com/reimagschool/status/1619665302450753536

David Locke @ReimagSchool

My wife's Kindergarten students felt very stressed and were crying when they had to take a standardized test. When she reported this to administrators their solution was "test them until they cry, and then stop." #testthemtiltheycry #resisttesting

Reply on Twitter 1619667712833363968 Retweet on Twitter 1619667712833363968 35 Like on Twitter 1619667712833363968 219 Twitter 1619667712833363968
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
drbradjohnson 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐝 𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐧 @drbradjohnson ·
28 Jan

Besides the many issues with standardized testing. Most students have no idea what they missed on the tests and teachers don't either. And by time they get results students have moved on to next grade. Making it useless to evaluate teachers & districts too.

Reply on Twitter 1619322557236404224 Retweet on Twitter 1619322557236404224 572 Like on Twitter 1619322557236404224 5016 Twitter 1619322557236404224
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.