• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Charter/Community Schools & Partnerships: Privatization Ending Public Education

February 3, 2019 By Nancy Bailey 11 Comments

Post Views: 234

A charter school can be a community school, and vice versa. 

~National Center for Community Schools

There’s new school management these days that might seem nice, but scratch beneath the service and it is privatization and the theft of America’s democratic public schools.

There are two points in this blog post.

  • Community schools might be charter schools in disguise.
  • Partnerships can steal school ownership from the community.

The Community Schools Deception

The idea of “community schools” evokes a sense of belonging. We see ourselves connected with others, our voices heard, and our children surrounded by adults who are eager to address their needs.

Some community schools meet this objective. They’re truly public schools, open to all children, and owned by the community which they represent. The school board is the governing body elected by those who live in the community.

These community schools demonstrate the best of a democracy, especially when they are diverse and inclusive.

Americans trust this concept. In a post heralding community schools Minneapolis blogger Sarah Lahm writes The support for community schools stands in stark contrast to previous city efforts behind market-based education reform.

But is it a stark contrast? Could our trust in community schools be used by the charter school industry to co-opt public schools?

Charter schools are not community schools.

And any school relying heavily on partnerships with business threatens to take the “public” out of public schools.

Ohio’s Charter/Virtual/Community Schools

I’ve written before how charter schools are called community schools in Ohio! (see State of Ohio)

The Ohio Council of Community Schools advertisement also emphasizes virtual schools. It’s difficult to see how virtual schools could be community schools.

From the Ohio website:

We seek partnerships that allow schools to not only thrive but innovate, and hold high standards for ourselves and others. 

They were home to the controversial e-school called ECOT, Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow riddled with scandal. ECOT closed, leaving students to scramble to find other schools.

LAUSD: Charters or Community Schools?

The Los Angeles Unified School District is celebrating community schools after a huge march by teachers where one of the demands was a cap on charter schools. In 2020-2021 the LAUSD will transform 20 schools into community schools.

One UCLA adjunct writes about how nice it is that UCLA is partnering with public schools. A partnership with UCLA might seem nice. Universities have always worked with public schools. They do research and supply student teachers to professional teachers for on-the-job preparation.

But university ownership of public education is another ballgame. UCLA now owns the public school. It isn’t truly a community school. It’s a UCLA school. UCLA will dictate how the community will be involved.

It’s worth remembering too, that many university education schools are corrupted by corporate reform like K-12 education. UCLA supports Teach for America. Will they place TFA novices into the Los Angeles community schools they now own?

Will LAUSD transform their public schools into community schools that are actually charter schools?

From Nonprofit Quarterly: 

The contract that ended the strike calls on the Los Angeles Unified School District to convert 30 schools in high need areas into community schools, “investing $400,000 in each one over two years.” Meanwhile, the agreement also includes a pledge that the school board will vote on a resolution asking the state to ‘establish a charter school cap’ and create a governor’s committee on charter schools.”

Dallas Partnerships Take Over Public Education

When partners sign up to take over public schools, the community must do what that business organization wants them to do. Tax dollars will mingle with the donation just like charters.

Dallas is selling their school district to school partners! From The Dallas Morning News: Dallas ISD Must Not Let Go of Plan to Partner with Private Operators for District Schools.

This sounds like a massive overhaul meaning Dallas is about to privatize all of their public schools! Yet it’s presented to the public as a necessary transformation.

The partners, not the public, will own Dallas’s public schools.

Questions When Dealing with Partners

If your school district is talking about community schools and partners here are some helpful hints.

  1. Make sure partners contribute to the goals of teachers and parents, or agree with the school’s agenda.
  2. Review the history of the partners and determine if they are a friend or foe to public education.
  3. Make sure the partnership doesn’t mean drastic changes to the school built on claims that the school district has failed.
  4. Does the partner use corporate reform talking points referring to failed schools?
  5. Is the partner known for their school reform initiatives?
  6. Exactly what will the changes mean to the school?
  7. Will teachers keep their jobs or be replaced?
  8. How many partners will there be?
  9. How many district schools will be taken over by partners?
  10. Will the partnership involve technology? How will it affect teaching?
  11. What kind of data will be collected on students and how will it be used?
  12. Outline the role of the partner and what their donation will do.
  13. Make sure the school board is still listening to their constituents and not outside philanthropists.
  14. Make sure community schools do not become charter schools.
  15. Read this blog post by Fordham University Professor Mark Naison called “How REAL Community Schools Differ from Charters that Adopt that Label.”

We live in a wealthy country that has the resources to support public schooling. Partnerships should be welcome as long as they do not destroy the ability of citizens to own their democratic public schools. If partners are replacing this ownership, it is school privatization and the end of public education.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: charter schools, Community Schools, Dallas Partners to take over schools, Lausd community schools, Ohio Community Schools, Public School Privatization, school Partnerships

Comments

  1. MG says

    February 3, 2019 at 12:59 pm

    We’re being led down the proverbial primrose path. When public schools embrace the community school concept, the school boards are selling us out because inherent in the idea of a community school is the sharing a children’s data with community partners to “justify” the investment those partners are making. Community Schools rank alongside charter schools, and we should all be wary of both. Public education is supposed to be free to those who use its services. If we have to give up our children’s data in exchange for a public education, public schools are no longer free and there is no access to a free public education.

    So far, the marketing of community schools is phenomenal; however, keep in mind children’s data is being monetized. The elite mostly white men in charge and their think tanks and institutions seem to want to make sure they stay in charge as demographics change. Hence the collection of children social and emotional data and the tracking of children from the cradle to the adult grave. Right now there is a big push for preschools and community partners to help fund these schools. As data becomes more interoperable, it becomes more capable of being monetized and more valuable to those intent on monetizing it.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      February 4, 2019 at 8:40 am

      Thank you for this. It is part of the dark but real side of privatization.

      Reply
  2. Stacy says

    February 3, 2019 at 4:38 pm

    “Make sure the partnership doesn’t mean drastic changes to the school built on claims that the school district has failed.”

    I’m not sure why this hint was so high on the list. I’m new to the blog. Do you have any older articles that would help me understand why you think this is an obvious red flag? I’ve taught in both charter and public schools (currently taking time off to get my masters) and I do think our schools need a drastic overhaul. I’m not saying charter schools and privatization are the answer, but I do not understand why you are averse to reform in general.

    I thank you in advance for your reply.

    Reply
    • Jim Mordecai says

      February 3, 2019 at 11:58 pm

      Publicly managed charter schools are a drastic reform that sucks funding from public schools and a reform that should end with a moratorium on charters in every state.

      Reply
      • Nancy Bailey says

        February 4, 2019 at 8:45 am

        Thanks, Jim.

        Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      February 4, 2019 at 8:44 am

      Hi Stacy, A trip to the library is in order or a search on line about the dangers of corporate school reform. Check out my books or look up articles on my blog. Public schools are not being funded and programs are cut. Why would you expect good schools under those conditions? And yet many teachers still manage to teach.

      Reply
      • Stacy says

        February 4, 2019 at 9:36 am

        Hi Nancy,

        I must say that I’m a little disappointed in your reply. I asked you which articles of yours I should read in order to learn more about your point of view in regards to this topic, but your response was “read my articles.” Sure, I can dig for them myself, and I guess I will now, but I was asking for an authentic interaction. Also the entire response sounded a bit condescending.

        I’ve been one of those teachers who still managed to teach, and I can tell you that there are a plethora of problems in the system that do not necessarily have to do with funding. For one, how much funding is wasted on brand new school-wide sets of exorbitantly priced curriculum every several years? There are so many components provided in these packaged kits that teachers don’t even feel the need to use. Put plain, old books in kids hands and let them dive in. We don’t need more dollars to spend on basal readers and workbooks and bells and whistles. I do agree that teachers are underpaid, and this is the real problem with funding cuts. We do need smaller class sizes and well-respected teachers, but funding is not the ONLY problem. There is a philosophical problem at the root of the system, which drives how we spend the money we already have.

        On another note, which I’m pretty sure you’d agree with, the NCLB-induced age of accountability sounds alright in theory, but in practice, it does not seem to be working. I’ve seen the sausage being made, so to speak, in the public school I worked in and it’s not a pretty sight. I was once handed a thick stack of papers detailing the skills my “bubble” kids needed in order to get to the next level on the state assessment. These were the handful of children who “had a shot”. My admin smiled and said “of course we teach all children….” She all but winked at me. It made me a little sick.

        When I said we need reform, these are the sorts of things I was talking about. As I stated above, I’m not sure why “reform” is a dirty word. It seems you misconstrued my statement to mean I am pro-privatization. I’m not entirely sure about my stance on that point, which is why I want more information, but I’m certainly not arguing for charter schools, just asking why any mention of reform is a red flag.

        Reply
        • Nancy Bailey says

          February 4, 2019 at 9:51 am

          My whole blog is about the problems of corporate school reform.

          Today’s school reform is not about the real reforms that are needed–like class size reduction, better buildings, etc. It’s about dismantling public schools and eliminating a professional teaching workforce.

          It is about partnerships that end our democratic ownership. It is about making a profit on kids.

          NCLB was a part of reform to destroy schools. I simply recommended you do some reading on the subject. Also check out my website for other blogs under “Activism” at the top of the page and books about the subject under reform.

          Good luck.

          Reply
          • ciedie aech says

            October 20, 2019 at 2:19 pm

            well said 🙂

  3. Roy Turrentine says

    February 6, 2019 at 4:39 pm

    I wonder if you caught the NPR o. Reading instruction this morning? I thought you would find it something you have talked about before.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      February 6, 2019 at 6:07 pm

      I checked. I think it is a replay of Emily Hanford’s piece. Thanks for letting me know.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
dianeravitch Diane Ravitch 🇺🇸🇺🇦🌈 @dianeravitch ·
18 Mar

Voucher schools don’t have to comply with IDEA for kids with disabilities. They are allowed to discriminate for any reason or none at all. #schoolschoose https://twitter.com/katielikesbikes/status/1636446553429647376

Katie 🌻 @KatieLikesBikes

@Forrest4Trees @GregAbbott_TX No one is reporting that private schools don't have to adhere to the Federal IDEA act. Kids with #disabilities will be further harmed because #publicschools provide important services to #PWD and are essentially having their budgets cut in half by the voucher system.

Reply on Twitter 1637123379458088962 Retweet on Twitter 1637123379458088962 61 Like on Twitter 1637123379458088962 174 Twitter 1637123379458088962
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
raepica1 Rae Pica @raepica1 ·
5h

THIS is what learning looks like in #earlychildhood. #play #parenting #AskingWhatif https://twitter.com/DanWuori/status/1637786756727619584

Dan Wuori @DanWuori

As babies explore cause and effect it’s not uncommon to see them test ideas over and over to see if the same thing happens each time. Watch this little guy studying the shadow he’s making on the rug. You’re seeing his brain make connections in real time.

Reply on Twitter 1637807757360242688 Retweet on Twitter 1637807757360242688 2 Like on Twitter 1637807757360242688 11 Twitter 1637807757360242688
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
19 Mar

Reading Aloud to Kids of all ages pays off!

Reply on Twitter 1637488064929976329 Retweet on Twitter 1637488064929976329 177 Like on Twitter 1637488064929976329 461 Twitter 1637488064929976329
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
19 Mar

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 17 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 43 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
jamaalbowmanny Jamaal Bowman Ed.D @jamaalbowmanny ·
19 Mar

I'm so proud to be endorsing @Brandon4Chicago! He's going to be the leader Chicago needs for this moment and I was so honored to be with him this weekend. Let's go!

Reply on Twitter 1637501952731873281 Retweet on Twitter 1637501952731873281 96 Like on Twitter 1637501952731873281 570 Twitter 1637501952731873281
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.