• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Pandemic Learning Loss Reports That Sell Online Programs Are Harmful For Students With Disabilities

July 26, 2021 By Nancy Bailey 6 Comments

Post Views: 270

Reports telling of pandemic learning loss to sell programs, especially online programs, are harmful to students with disabilities who often had a difficult time being schooled at home with virtual learning.

One can only assume that students might be behind. But it’s detrimental, especially for children who often have motivation problems, to repeatedly hear they’ll have trouble catching up. They might give up!

Parents and teachers know best how individual children struggled and the progress they made. Missing out on socialization with peers was unfortunate.

However, there’s little research to show that students with disabilities have serious learning losses after the last two years, or that a specific online program will help. It’s especially deceptive when that negativity is used to sell programs.

While sketchy, the reports about pandemic learning loss have been drummed up in the media, and many companies are promoting their products as necessary to help close achievement gaps.

How does the public trust learning loss reports that come from those selling products?

Here’s an example of what I mean.

Former CNN reporter Campbell Brown and other known critics of public schools and teachers are behind The74. Their funders include billionaires, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Chan-Zuckerberg Foundation, the Walton Foundation, etc.

In Strong Gains, Quick Losses: New Research on Students with Disabilities Finds Conventional Data Hides Both Opportunity and Risk, they partnered with the National Center for Learning Disabilities to highlight a report by the NWEA, which is a not-for-profit organization.

They say:

States, districts, and schools should invest in high-quality curriculum backed by evidence of effectiveness — particularly for students with disabilities. They should consider offering more learning time and research-backed tutoring. Using good data to personalize instruction is key to serving children with disabilities, as is embracing universal design, a strategy of modifying lessons to make them accessible to any student.

Note. Personalized instruction implies virtual learning, and parents are concerned about online data collection.

The NWEA report Center for School and Learning Progress is about summer learning loss and Covid-19. The special education categories they include are autism, deaf-blindness, deafness, emotional disturbance, hearing impairments, intellectual disability, multiple disabilities, orthopedic, other health impairments, specific learning disability, speech or language impairment, traumatic brain injury, and visual impairment including blindness.

They say:

If loss of opportunities to learn during the pandemic is similar to loss of learning opportunities during summer break, then the findings of this study provide further reason to believe that students with disabilities may be more severely impacted than their peers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As schools return to in-person instruction, there is an urgent need to gauge and respond to the impact COVID-19 has had on student learning, especially for students with disabilities, who might be more affected by loss of learning opportunities during the out-of-school time (p.6).

The NCLD has also pushed the idea of learning loss on their site.

COVID-19 shuttered school buildings and the impact on students will potentially be significant for years to come. Experts predict that school closures last spring could leave students a full year behind in math — with even greater impact as disruptions in instruction continue through the 2020–2021 school year.

The media have repeatedly mentioned the NWEA in the past. Their earlier study said students were behind in math, as described in U. S. News and World Report.

The NWEA deserves scrutiny. Here Peter Greene writes about their involvement with MAP testing.

Here’s a list of NWEA’s partners, all of whom will likely profit from their learning loss reports and all of which are online platforms.

The products are:

  • MAP Accelerator powered by Khan Academy
  • Newsela
  • Teach to One Road Maps
  • Achieve 3000
  • Carnegie Learning
  • Classworks
  • Curriculum Works
  • Dream Box
  • Edgenuity
  • Edmentum
  • FEV Tutor
  • Imagine Learning
  • Khan Academy
  • Lift off by Education Galaxy
  • Math Seeds
  • Mindprint – MAP Growth Learning Plan
  • National Geographic Learning
  • Otus
  • Reading Eggs
  • ScootPod
  • Silverback Learning Solutions
  • Teacher Advisor
  • Wowzers

Companies will always need to advertise their products.

Still, it doesn’t seem appropriate that an organization claiming to be not-for-profit writes reports that look like research, highlighting questionable learning loss for students with disabilities when their partners, with online programs, will benefit from such reports.

Where’s the independent, unbiased research to determine the benefit of these programs?

Parents and educators might want to search for peer-reviewed research, if any, by university scholars instead of those who partner with companies promoting their own products. Peer-reviewed reports aren’t always perfect, but they are usually better and more objective.

In the meantime, students with disabilities and all students deserve positivity during the pandemic, which unfortunately is by no means over. Help them see that they can make up for lost time and still enjoy learning.

And educators and parents need more authentic peer-reviewed reports telling how and whether programs truly help children learn.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: Acceleration, children with disabilities, Covid Slide, covid-19, learning loss, Pandemic learning loss, the pandemic

Comments

  1. Sheila Resseger says

    July 26, 2021 at 2:53 pm

    “Where’s the independent, unbiased research to determine the benefit of these programs?” Where, indeed? I was tasked with using the NWEA assessments in my last few years of teaching at the RI School for the Deaf. (I retired in 2011.) I found the assessments less than useful. The results did not at all match what I had observed of my students in the year that I spent with them. Whatever the NWEA’s arcane method for arriving at projected student growth was, it was not only a mystery, but a fantasy. Bells and whistles and instantaneous results with a plethora of charts is not in the same universe as a one-on-one diagnostic assessment of literacy and English language administered by a professional who understands the disability and understands development in literacy skills. The multiple-choice mayhem of the NWEA does neither. (full disclosure–I had the linguistics background to administer these assessments in preparation for the students’ IEPs. Yes, this was time-consuming, but it also provided actual diagnostic results that classroom teachers could use with that specific student. Remember that IEP stands for INDIVIDUAL Education Plan.) still steaming about NWEA 10 years later

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      July 26, 2021 at 9:40 pm

      How interesting. I noticed you had written about this in Peter’s post. So many tests waste a student’s and teacher’s time. Thank goodness you were able to help students by obtaining useful information. Thanks for sharing, Sheila.

      Reply
  2. Roy Turrentine says

    July 26, 2021 at 3:22 pm

    “Still, it doesn’t seem appropriate that an organization claiming to be not-for-profit writes reports that look like research, highlighting questionable learning loss for students with disabilities when their partners, with online programs, will benefit from such reports.”

    Of course it does not seem appropriate. That is because the snake oil salesperson is not to be trusted. Do you have dark around the eyes? Pain around the heart? Just buy hokum.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      July 26, 2021 at 9:41 pm

      I’m afraid that’s the deal at this time, Roy. Thank you for driving home that point.

      Reply
  3. Nancy Bailey says

    August 17, 2021 at 3:01 pm

    My thanks to the National Education Policy Center!

    https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/pandemic-learning-loss

    Reply
  4. Nancy Bailey says

    August 20, 2021 at 7:58 pm

    My thanks to the Network for Public Education.

    https://networkforpubliceducation.org/blog-content/nancy-bailey-pandemic-learning-loss-reports-that-sell-online-programs-are-harmful-for-students-with-disabilities/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
plthomasedd Paul Thomas @plthomasedd ·
10h

@susanoha @NancyEBailey1 "Sell What We Do": The Manufactured Crisis to Hide the Story Being Sold https://radicalscholarship.com/2023/01/30/sell-what-we-do-the-manufactured-crisis-to-hide-the-story-being-sold/

Reply on Twitter 1620071079279722497 Retweet on Twitter 1620071079279722497 2 Like on Twitter 1620071079279722497 2 Twitter 1620071079279722497
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
drmaryhoward Dr. Mary Howard @drmaryhoward ·
29 Jan

Nancy Bailey: Reading Disabilities: Focus on Public Schools NOT School Choice!

“It’s unfair to say public school teachers fail to teach reading, while charter schools show substandard results. This creates a double standard.” @NancyEBailey1

https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619829619343106050 Retweet on Twitter 1619829619343106050 1 Like on Twitter 1619829619343106050 3 Twitter 1619829619343106050
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
29 Jan

The focus should be on lifting traditional public schools & reading programs for many students who attend those schools rather than on unproven private and charter schools. Fix IDEA by increasing options. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/01/29/reading-disabilities-focus-on-public-schools-not-school-choice/

Reply on Twitter 1619827835786629120 Retweet on Twitter 1619827835786629120 2 Like on Twitter 1619827835786629120 1 Twitter 1619827835786629120
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
arizona_sos Save Our Schools AZ @arizona_sos ·
28 Jan

Special interests call ESA vouchers “scholarships” because private schools select their students. It’s not “school choice,” it’s the school’s choice 😡#AZVoucherWatch #VouchersHurt #FundOurSchools

http://bit.ly/SellingSchoolChoice

Reply on Twitter 1619455283402608640 Retweet on Twitter 1619455283402608640 72 Like on Twitter 1619455283402608640 193 Twitter 1619455283402608640
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
danwuori Dan Wuori @danwuori ·
29 Jan

On-demand standardized testing has no place in kindergarten. There are far more appropriate and meaningful methods of assessing young children. https://twitter.com/reimagschool/status/1619665302450753536

David Locke @ReimagSchool

My wife's Kindergarten students felt very stressed and were crying when they had to take a standardized test. When she reported this to administrators their solution was "test them until they cry, and then stop." #testthemtiltheycry #resisttesting

Reply on Twitter 1619667712833363968 Retweet on Twitter 1619667712833363968 35 Like on Twitter 1619667712833363968 225 Twitter 1619667712833363968
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.