• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Personalized (Online) Learning Fails at Classroom Dynamics and Socialization

November 24, 2018 By Nancy Bailey 6 Comments

Post Views: 565

Let’s get together, yeah yeah yeah
Think of all that we could sha-are
Let’s get together everyday
Every way and everywhere
And though we haven’t got a lot
We could be sharin’ all we’ve got
Together

~Haley Mills, From Walt Disney’s The Parent Trap

The public school classroom is a sacred community. How students socialize in school will be how they interact with each other as adults. Online learning drastically changes classroom dynamics. Students miss important humanization and learning skills when schools focus too heavily on technology.

Personalized learning, the way it is defined and set up, where students work mostly alone online, is an anti-socialization experiment that could haunt us for years to come.

Schools which emphasize personalized learning are realizing a gap is created when it comes to student communication. See Ed. Week’s “Sometimes Personalized Learning Feels Impersonal.”

Technology has much to offer, but it should not replace real teachers and classroom dynamics. Technology is a tool.

NPR’s recent personalized learning piece “The Future of Learning: Well It’s Personal” alludes to how tech shortchanges students.

In the report, Jade Davis an expert in emerging technologies in education, and the director of digital project management at Columbia University Libraries says:

I think of kids with machines that have algorithms attached to them that move them through learning at the pace where the student is. It’s going to sort students. It’s going to stereotype, put up roadblocks and make assumptions about how students should be thinking. In other words, what’s sold as “personalization” can actually become dehumanizing. Teachers, I point out, can and do show biases as well. But teachers can attempt to remedy their bias … teachers are learners in the space, too, but software is not.

Here’s what’s lost when students forfeit schooling for nonstop online learning.

Student Feedback

Students miss face-to-face interactions with peers. They mostly work alone at their skill level.

In traditional classes, students contribute their personal experiences to class discussions. They get to express themselves.  Through storytelling, students acquire better language skills. Guided by teachers, student experiences become part of the class experience.

It’s like show-and-tell when students are young. Contributing to class interchanges makes learning interesting. We remember subject matter better when it’s connected to stories.

Socialization

Class dynamics bring students and teachers together. Classroom communications help students understand differences that make us human. Students learn what makes a school and society work.

Students like to socialize in school. It’s part of the school experience. It motivates some to attend school! Students feel engaged when included in class discussions.

Good teachers help quiet students find their voice, and they teach overzealous students to learn to be polite and listen.

Auditory Feedback

Listening skills are critical. Many students learn by listening.

Hearing about the information reinforces what students will remember about the topic. I am an auditory learner, and class discussions always helped me remember the information.

Students who lose out on classroom dynamics, won’t learn about their classmates.

Discipline

Rules guide classroom dynamics. Students learn politeness and respectfulness.

When should they interrupt? How do they interject their thoughts into the conversation appropriately?

Young children learn to take turns. They develop patience. Learning how to respond to other children teaches self-regulating social skills.

Students learn to listen and respect others, even if they disagree. Sometimes there’s respectful debate.

Students express their feelings, and they get positive or negative feedback. They learn other opinions exist.

Special Education 

Students need opportunities to be included in class discussions so they can emotionally connect with their peers. They won’t get that sitting alone on a computer.

Students learn to respect the differences that make us all unique.

Understanding differences and learning to appreciate each other is what makes a well-run inclusion class so important.

Diversity 

Good class dynamics help students learn tolerance and to be respectful of those who are different than themselves.

Personalized learning avoids this necessary communication.

Communication

Personalized learning might provide students with opportunities to connect with students around the world. Gaining access to many people through social media is exciting and a good thing about digital learning.

But real communication happens face-to-face. We will never reach a point where knowing people in person and communicating in real time will be better replaced by screen associations.

Now more than ever, we need to foster the interpersonal relationships between students, so that they feel socially connected learning together. That happens best through class dynamics.

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: auditory feedback. socialization, Class dynamics, Class dynamics vs. Online Instruction, Communication, Digital Learning, discipline, Diversity, Online Learning, Personalized Learning, public schools, school, special education, student expression, student feedback

Comments

  1. Sheila Resseger says

    November 24, 2018 at 6:32 pm

    I agree with you completely, Nancy. While technology can foster engaged learning as a group if directed by the teacher for that purpose, digital modules that adapt to individual students’ pace and progress are antithetical to deep learning, in my view. Another serious drawback to digital/adaptive learning is that there is no provision for students to ask questions–for clarification or curiosity. What does this teach subliminally? Remember Marshall McLuhan–the medium is the message.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      November 26, 2018 at 8:25 pm

      Excellent points, Sheila. Children are like pigeons pecking until they get the right answer. I always appreciate your comments. Thank you.

      Reply
  2. Roger Titcombe says

    November 25, 2018 at 3:53 am

    You are right Nancy, but as well as making schools nasty and unpleasant, de-socialised instruction causes harm to deep learning and cognitive development.

    In terms of the facilitation of deep learning, curiosity is the essential fundamental cognitive urge. I characterise curiosity-driven ‘deep learning’ as that which builds ascending levels of cognitive sophistication (Piagetian plastic intelligence) as distinct from the ‘training’ that can be achieved through passive study, instruction and memorisation on the behaviourist learning model.

    Vygotsky took the view that just as language learning is a social process for which talking and conversation are fundamental necessities, the same is true of all deep learning. Here are some of his thoughts.

    “The true direction of the development of thinking is not from the individual to the social, but from the social to the individual.

    By giving our students practice in talking with others, we give them frames for thinking on their own.

    Every function in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level, and later, on the individual level; first, between people (inter-psychological) and then inside the child (intra-psychological). This applies equally to voluntary attention, to logical memory, and to the formation of concepts. All the higher functions originate as actual relationships between individuals.

    Through others we become ourselves.

    What children can do with the assistance of others might be in some sense even more indicative of their mental development than what they can do alone.

    The child begins to perceive the world not only through his [or her] eyes but also through his [or her] speech.

    Human learning presupposes a specific social nature and a process by which children grow into the intellectual life of those around them”.

    So ‘machine learning’, which isolates students from conversation and debate with their peers cuts off the tap that feeds cognitive development.

    Read more here

    https://rogertitcombelearningmatters.wordpress.com/2017/09/25/the-learning-instinct/

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      November 26, 2018 at 8:31 pm

      Thank you, Roger. You listed my favorite child developmental specialists! You’re also right about the harm the loss of interactions mean for children.

      You also mentioned SLANT. I think that might have originally been a learning strategy for students with learning disabilities. I have never understood why it would be used for students without attention difficulties.

      .

      Reply
  3. Sheila Resseger says

    November 25, 2018 at 7:31 pm

    I wrote this blog post 2 1/2 years ago. Things are worse now.

    https://resseger.wordpress.com/2016/05/27/story-telling-species/

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      November 26, 2018 at 8:36 pm

      Thank you for this, Sheila. It covers a lot about why digital learning misses it. And isn’t it stunning how Coleman’s statement summed up this movement.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
genebryant2 Gene Bryant @genebryant2 ·
6h

Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona is calling on schools to stop using corporal punishment, citing the practice’s long-term effect on children’s physical & mental health, particularly for boys, students in special education programs, & Black students. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/education-secretary-calls-for-end-to-corporal-punishment/2023/03

Reply on Twitter 1640283986357256193 Retweet on Twitter 1640283986357256193 2 Like on Twitter 1640283986357256193 Twitter 1640283986357256193
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
55m

If you're not paying attention to what's happening to public schools, and how they're being privatized, start here with @tultican. https://tultican.com/2023/03/23/the-oligarchs-education-propaganda-distributor/

Reply on Twitter 1640359360210558977 Retweet on Twitter 1640359360210558977 1 Like on Twitter 1640359360210558977 1 Twitter 1640359360210558977
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
helenproulx2 Helen Proulx @helenproulx2 ·
13h

Worrisome indeed. And read-alouds are not enough. How might we create opportunities for rich & varied experiences with texts from the start? How can we be sure that Ss are encouraged & not limited by instruction? https://twitter.com/NancyEBailey1/status/1640105213276180480

Nancy E. Bailey @NancyEBailey1

Science of Reading camp never discusses the importance of picture books. How much time do children get to explore them? How often are they read to for enjoyment? This is worrisome. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/26/the-science-of-reading-and-the-rejection-of-picture-books/

Reply on Twitter 1640184549454802949 Retweet on Twitter 1640184549454802949 1 Like on Twitter 1640184549454802949 8 Twitter 1640184549454802949
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
beebryhte Belinda Whyte @beebryhte ·
17h

https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/26/the-science-of-reading-and-the-rejection-of-picture-books/
Not sure I could agree more...thanks @NancyEBailey1

Reply on Twitter 1640122924026978304 Retweet on Twitter 1640122924026978304 3 Like on Twitter 1640122924026978304 7 Twitter 1640122924026978304
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
1 Mar

Unstructured play has been driven out of early childhood classrooms for years! Goals are to micromanage everything a child does. Few seem to connect play's importance to learning & mental health, or they don't care if schools fail. https://twitter.com/Cabal_Educator/status/1630938079170109440

Kimberly Blodgett @Cabal_Educator

Let them play!

Reply on Twitter 1630961018854621185 Retweet on Twitter 1630961018854621185 8 Like on Twitter 1630961018854621185 14 Twitter 1630961018854621185
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.