• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Kindergarten Reading Push: Still Problematic During the Pandemic

August 3, 2020 By Nancy Bailey 10 Comments

Post Views: 1,382

Parents and educators, convinced that kindergartners must learn to read, might purchase unproven commercial online reading programs during the pandemic. The best solution for kindergartners currently is for school librarians and teachers to get interesting picture books and reading material into the hands of young children.

Standardized testing made pushing children to read in kindergarten part of the curriculum. No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, and Common Core State Standards contributed to remaking kindergarten. Now this harmful practice is interwoven into the kindergarten curriculum.

During a pandemic, it would seem like these harsh kindergarten requirements could be dropped. Instead, mandatory reading goals still highlight kindergarten.

A report by Christina A. Samuels in Education Week “Will Kindergartens Be Empty this Fall?” illustrates the problem. The report describes difficulties school leaders face getting parents to register their kindergartners for school this fall. But it doesn’t take long before they describe a push for academics.

Kindergarten readiness assessments are mandatory in more than half the states, with the idea that they can help teachers better understand their students’ needs. Other states and communities have programs intended to help children get off to a strong academic start by smoothing the transition between home and formal schooling.

Most troubling is the comment referring to the article above.

Unfortunately, laws and public policy have not kept up with changing educational standards. Kindergarten is now the grade where children learn to read. Where I teach, they must learn to decode all regular short vowel words, some long vowels, especially “silent e,” and at least 60 sight words. Children who enter first grade without these skills are already behind, and catching them up is usually limited to small group time by administrative fiat.

This commenter is convinced that such expectations are right. They add:

Still, kindergarten is treated as optional, both by parents who weren’t taught to read until first grade, and by legislators. That has to change. 

Why? Who’s the wizard behind the screen demanding that four and five-year-old students read before first grade?

Comments like this place unnecessary pressure on parents, working with their children at home during the pandemic. If kindergartners are not able to read when they’re four or five, parents might believe they have failed. They might think their child is slow or has a learning disability.

Teachers are often blamed for not teaching the right reading program, by those selling unproven online commercial programs. Or teachers are set up to teach bland decoding exercises that young children will not find interesting.

According to Defending the Early Years, there’s no research to show that pushing children to learn to read in kindergarten is helpful long-term. In Reading Instruction in Kindergarten: Little to Gain and Much to Lose, the authors document several studies that show it could be harmful.

The kindergarten reading push has become so engrained in the curriculum, it has been called the new first grade. It could set a child up for reading problems. 

Some parents, realizing how difficult kindergarten has become, might hold their child back a year, especially during the pandemic, before allowing them to start school, a process called redshirting.

Those who accept reading standards as law, who continue to imply that kindergarten is a time children must learn to read, disregard the disservice they’re doing to children. Or they pretend that kindergarten pressure doesn’t exist.

Some imply that children are different today than they were years ago, that they are able to learn earlier. There’s no proof of this.

Here are some better suggestions.

  • Ask children to express their interests. Get them books that reflect those interests.
  • Introduce children to books about their cultural heritage and that of their peers. Books help curious children learn about the world around them.
  • Present children with picture books, easy-reading chapter books, and reading material like comic books. Let them choose the books they’d like to read.
  • If a child wishes to hear a picture book read to them over and over, do it! Children are learning the sounds and the words.
  • Read rhyming books, and poetry like Shel Silverstein. Children love humor! More than ever they need to laugh during this serious time.
  • Many wonderfully illustrated magazines will capture a child’s interest. One favorite is Highlights for Children. 
  • Let children tell stories about a book or whatever they make up. Focus on speech and language. Listen.
  • Don’t forget the importance of letting children play.

We will get through Covid-19, and the most important thing to do to help children learn at this age, is to present them with many books that matter to them, read to them, and let them talk.

Make reading pleasurable. Contact your community library or your school and find out the best and safest way to get books to your child.

Kindergarten reading should not be forced. Reading should be fun.

P.S. Google is getting books to children by way of drone in Virginia. That might be exciting, if children are more excited to read the books they drop.

_______

Here are several resource pages under Curriculum from my website. It’s a Hodge podge of resources. I am continually adding to it. Let me know of anything you believe is helpful and I will add.

Early Childhood

Reading

Special Education

Autism

Learning Disabilities

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: assessment, books, kindergarten, pandemic, Picture Books, reading

Comments

  1. Paul Bonner says

    August 3, 2020 at 9:47 am

    As a school practitioner who was an elementary principal for 12 years I find this perspective spot on. What our “reading first” focus has done is created more stress in young children along with less motivation to learn. I also saw this in my own kids. The focus should be socialization and exploration for young children. This naturally builds curiosity, empathy, and motivation to learn. Kindergarteners should not only be provided picture books, but opportunities to use their hands and play. the education establishment is guilty of making reading and math the ends leaving too many students grasping for purpose brought about by limited experience. As far as policy in the area of curriculum, this may be the most critical change that needs to happen.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      August 3, 2020 at 10:01 am

      ABSOLUTELY! Play is critical! Thank you!

      Reply
  2. Dave Raudenbush says

    August 3, 2020 at 9:52 am

    Decoding is not the foundation of reading. That’s where so many get it wrong. The foundation of reading is thinking like a reader. That’s best developed through read alouds, think alouds, and through talking about books and stories. We need to get kids to want to read as much as they want snack time or recess. Those kids will easily conquer the tasks related to decoding.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      August 3, 2020 at 11:20 am

      I agree. Thank you, Dave!

      Reply
    • Linda Montalbano says

      August 10, 2020 at 11:04 am

      Whole language reading programs are the reason we are now a nation of poor readers. Orton-Gillingham reading approach is 100 years old going strong. Reading programs like I-Ready fails almost half the children forced to learn how to read. In Manatee County School Board they use I-Ready. Chair of the MCSB, Gina Messenger, a school board member Manatee CSB stated at a Tea Party debate, I-Ready only teaches 53% of the students to grade level and it is a known fact it does not teach reading to children with dyslexia and neurological disabilities.

      Reply
      • Nancy Bailey says

        August 10, 2020 at 11:29 am

        Your statement about whole language is not proven by the I-Ready complaint. I don’t know anyone who would see I-Ready as whole language. I also don’t know any parent or teacher who likes that program. It’s an online program that focuses on Common Core that is profiting well in places like the State of Florida, as you say.

        Why not coordinate parents and ask your board to restore instruction to the teachers? Who’s making your district use that program?

        Also, I do not accept money for my blog, and I choose not to advertise programs that aren’t backed by proof, or ones that make blanket attacks on teachers. While I have nothing against OG, there’s no research after about 80 years to say it works. It may or may not be effective but it isn’t a cure all for every child with reading problems. Implying that teachers don’t know how to teach reading is insulting.

        Reply
  3. Kathy C says

    August 3, 2020 at 1:28 pm

    My two granddaughters attend a public Montessori magnet school. When the oldest was in first grade, it wasn’t until the middle of first grade when she turned 7 in January, with a little extra reading support, that the reading lightbulb went off. Her progress after that was rapid. She just finished second grade and her oral reading is terrific. She reads with such expression and ease. She was never pushed. I must admit, though, as a retired teacher who spent most of my career teaching third and fourth grade, I was a bit concerned that she wasn’t really reading by Christmas of first grade. It just supports so much what you are saying. Children will read when they are ready!

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      August 4, 2020 at 9:57 pm

      It is important to make sure they’re making progress and aren’t getting frustrated, but the kindergarten standards are inappropriate. First grade has always been when schools started formal reading instruction.

      I am happy your daughter is reading well now. Thanks for sharing, Kathy.

      Reply
  4. Patrick Wiltshire says

    August 4, 2020 at 6:52 am

    I’m confident my daughter’s pre-K kids will master the reading skills required of them in Kindergarten but I am concerned about the impact of the stress of doing so at that age and if that just leads to sustained anxiety and behavioral problems. Also, due to the wide disparity of achievement likely seen in these Kindergarten reading programs is there will be both a false sense of inferiority by those children who struggle at that age but also, and in some ways worse, a false sense of high-achievement by children and parent. This can lead to future problems when other kids catch up developmentally with their dear little Einstein’s, rendering them merely average to just above average.

    Viewing early education as a competitive race between children, schools, states and nations is toxic and disgusting.

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      August 4, 2020 at 9:59 pm

      Excellent point, Patrick. Most children catch up to the early readers later. If early readers were pushed to learn early, they may wind up disliking reading even if they know how to do it.

      Thank you!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
plthomasedd Paul Thomas @plthomasedd ·
4h

The Science of Scarcity and Sleep that Education Reformers (Want to) Ignore https://radicalscholarship.com/2023/03/20/the-science-of-scarcity-and-sleep-that-education-reformers-want-to-ignore/ via @plthomasEdD

Reply on Twitter 1638146543768174597 Retweet on Twitter 1638146543768174597 3 Like on Twitter 1638146543768174597 4 Twitter 1638146543768174597
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
doctorsam7 Dr. Sam Bommarito @doctorsam7 ·
23h

Things to ponder about the current discussions around SOR. From ChatGPT @ChatwithGPT
https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/?fbclid=IwAR0Fhkczq46nJq8n5ob1q2xF5Q9aFc9ya04TEgYCaVTyEElEQg_UbWfoROY

Reply on Twitter 1637853806833590275 Retweet on Twitter 1637853806833590275 10 Like on Twitter 1637853806833590275 29 Twitter 1637853806833590275
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
19 Mar

I asked ChatGPT "Is the 'science of reading' settled science that determines how reading should be taught?" Here's the response. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/19/what-does-chatgpt-say-about-the-science-of-reading-it-may-surprise-you/

Reply on Twitter 1637502147515351043 Retweet on Twitter 1637502147515351043 18 Like on Twitter 1637502147515351043 46 Twitter 1637502147515351043
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
deguire_mike Mike DeGuire, Ph. D. @deguire_mike ·
16h

"The privatization movement has been strategically designed...by billionaires and their fellow investors for specific purposes: to lower their own tax burden, and ideologically to dismantle public education." @NPEaction @NancyEBailey1 @TheAndySpears
https://medium.com/@jfiske80/billionaires-and-their-investors-are-impacting-education-policies-in-colorado-and-especially-in-c523579674af

Reply on Twitter 1637957759751831558 Retweet on Twitter 1637957759751831558 15 Like on Twitter 1637957759751831558 19 Twitter 1637957759751831558
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nepctweet NEPC @nepctweet ·
22h

"Let’s honor our students by providing them free quality democratic public schools that reject no one." @NancyEBailey1 https://bit.ly/3FE0KFA

Reply on Twitter 1637870110840094721 Retweet on Twitter 1637870110840094721 3 Like on Twitter 1637870110840094721 2 Twitter 1637870110840094721
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.