• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Nancy Bailey's Education Website

Revive, Rally and Recover Public Schools

  • Activism
    • Anti-Charter Schools
    • Anti-Common Core State Standards
    • Anti-Corporatization of Schools
    • Anti-High-Stakes Testing
    • State Action Groups
    • School Buildings
  • School Curriculum
    • General Education
    • Educators
    • Parents
    • Reading
    • Writing
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Studies
    • The Arts
    • Technology
    • Behavior
    • Diversity
    • English Language Learners
    • Special Education
      • Autism
      • Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities
      • Learning Disabilities
      • Developmental Disabilities
      • Gifted
      • Other
    • Early Childhood Education
    • Elementary School
    • Middle School
    • High School
    • Student Careers
  • Other Countries
    • England
    • Finland
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • Canada

Amplify and iReady Claim Kindergarten and First Grade “Reading Loss” to Profit From the Pandemic

December 30, 2020 By Nancy Bailey 6 Comments

Post Views: 854

Are kindergartners falling behind in reading due to the pandemic? Amplify and iReady want us to think so.

But kindergarten teachers should not be forcing children to learn to read during the pandemic. They shouldn’t have been pushing them to read before Covid-19. Nor should kindergartners be forced to read after the coronavirus becomes a bad memory.

Children always used to begin formal reading instruction during first grade. Expecting kindergartners to read by the time they get to first grade is bizarre. Still, by making children look like they’re falling behind, companies can make money on reading remediation and tutorial programs. During the pandemic it’s called the covid slide. 

Education Week promotes this wrong message in Students’ reading losses could strain schools’ capacity to help them catch up. They say Amplify and iReady claim children fall behind in reading because they are entering first grade not knowing how to read.

It’s going to cost billions, according to iReady, to remediate these so-called reading problems. Where will the money go? To the same programs saying that reading is a problem!

They say it could cost $42 billion to provide two-week intensive reading academies to catch up six months of instruction for half of the U.S. public schoolchildren who need it, and $66 billion to catch those students up on one to two years’ worth of lost instruction using daily tutoring over the course of a year.

In the Education Week report, it’s the supporters of Amplify and iReady; both questionable Common Core-aligned online programs, who say children are behind. I’ve written about iReady and the pandemic before, so I will focus on Amplify.

They also say:

The most comprehensive study to date of pandemic-related learning loss in the earliest grades finds that some 40 percent of 1st graders have come to school this fall significantly behind in early literacy skills—particularly around phonics—and they will need intensive interventions to prevent them from ending the year reading below grade level. The study confirms that even the youngest students are experiencing the so-called “COVID slide,” and counters some recent studies that suggested there have been minimal losses in reading.

In the fall of 2020, 1.26 million students were assessed with mCLASS. Amplify’s review of beginning-of-year data from DIBELS® reveals significant instructional loss due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These data are collected by teachers interacting directly with students one-on-one, either live or over video.

It’s phonics that children supposedly miss. But concerns abound about the use of DIBELS as an assessment are described well in the Answer Sheet’s Is this really how we should test reading development in children?

Supporters of DIBELS argue that it is only ever to be used as a single indicator. But, the last decade of standardized testing has convincingly demonstrated that what is tested will be taught: exactly how it is tested. Similarly, what is suggested by the glossy, colored charts assessment data DIBELS software automatically generates, will be believed.

DIBELS focuses too much on speed and nonsense syllables. It’s a hangover from the scandalous Reading First program. See this also from Education Week in 2001, National clout of DIBELS test draws scrutiny. 

Tulsa teachers reviewed Amplify before and found it to be age inappropriate.

With pandemic woes, school districts may struggle to survive, but will it be a cash cow for companies selling reading programs? Larry Berger, chief executive officer of Amplify, not an educator, says:

One of the most expensive problems you can create is a kid who does not master phonemic awareness by the end of 1st grade. So even if you have limited money, you might want to move it toward that problem, because that failure to learn to read has cascading downstream effects that are well known. I think districts that are taking this seriously are saying OK, I have limited resources but this is a triage situation.

It was just yesterday that third grade was the year children were supposed to be reading. Now it’s first grade!

Falling behind due to Covid-19 opens the flood gates for online programs to sell their remediation and tutorial materials, especially to those convinced children must read before first grade.

Amplify appeared in 2012, born of Wireless Generation, purchased by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp in 2010, and provided assessment, analytics, and data-driven instruction for the next-generation Common Core State Standards. Joel Klein, a lawyer and charter school and school choice enthusiast, who angered many educators and parents during his reign as Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, became Amplify’s CEO, asking the question Can Technology Save Education?

Amplify failed. Few school districts wanted to invest in it. Enter the Emerson Collective, a philanthropic organization founded by Lauren Powell Jobs, not an educator, who purchased it in 2015. The company is trying to revitalize, and one of their ploys is using the Science of Reading. Many of the individuals who highlight the Science of Reading do podcasts for Amplify, even though it’s difficult to find research showing Amplify is the science of anything.

Amplify is one of many attempts to transform public schooling into technology, and with the pandemic, that seems to have been made easier.

Ask who’s benefiting from all this reading deficit talk before jumping to conclusions that children have reading problems. Then collect as many picture books as possible to share with young learners. Use the pandemic to move away from this wrong notion that children must read by the time they enter first grade.

References

Sparks, S.D. (2020, December 15) Students’ reading losses could strain schools’ capacity to help them catch up. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/students-reading-losses-could-strain-schools-capacity-to-help-them-catch-up/2020/12

Strauss, V. (2014, June 25) Is this really how we should test reading development in kids? The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/06/25/is-this-really-how-we-should-test-reading-development-in-kids/

Manzo, K.K. (2001, September 27) National clout of DIBELS test draws scrutiny. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/national-clout-of-dibels-test-draws-scrutiny/2005/09

Filed Under: Featured, Uncategorized Tagged With: Amplify, assessment, Covid Slide, covid-19, DIBELS, first grade reading, iReady, Kindergarten reading, profiting on reading, Reading Expectations, the Pandemic learning loss

Comments

  1. Mary says

    December 30, 2020 at 1:16 pm

    I felt the same way about not rushing them but am now completely freaking out because I have figured out they do not teach phonics or beginning reading at all in first grade curriculum. So if they don’t learn in kindergarten they are lost. They are teaching crazy stuff like writing poetry & plural possessive nouns now in first grade & I can’t find any sound/letter association practice or instruction. So many are being referred for Dyslexia & SpEd. Tragic

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 30, 2020 at 1:18 pm

      I’m wondering, who says they’re lost? Is this one school?

      Thanks for sharing, Mary.

      Reply
  2. Stephen Krashen says

    December 30, 2020 at 1:24 pm

    Here is some real evidence that “early” is not the answer”. Krashen, S. 2014. Literacy education: Need we start early? Language and Language Teaching (Azim Premji University and the Vidya Bhawan Society), 3(2)(9): 1-7. https://tinyurl.com/sddlsmh

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 30, 2020 at 1:41 pm

      This is great! Thank you for sharing, Dr. Krashen. It is especially timely considering all the discussion about phonics and covid slide.

      I especially appreciated this and parents should too:

      Another set of cases of readers who started late but caught up through voluntary reading comes from Fink (1995/6). Fink studied 12 people who were considered dyslexic when they were young, who all became “skilled readers”. Out of the 12 people, 9 published creative scholarly works and one was a Nobel laureate. Eleven out of these people reported that they finally learned to read between the ages of 10 and 12 (p. 273), and one did not learn to read until the 12th grade.

      According to Fink, these readers had a lot in common:

      “As children, each had a passionate personal interest, a burning desire to know more about a discipline that required reading. Spurred by this passionate interest, all read voraciously, seeking and reading everything they could get their hands on about a single intriguing topic” (pp. 274-275).

      Reply
  3. Phyllis says

    December 30, 2020 at 2:35 pm

    Hi Nancy-
    I shared your article on FB with this comment.
    Shameless curriculum publishers like iReady and Amplify are frothing at the mouth as they estimate the amount of money they say it will cost to help students catch up. And they are more than happy to develop materials they claim will do the job. I hope and pray district and state superintendents do not throw away precious funding by succumbing to fear-mongering by these money-grubbing corporate snakes.
    These very companies are the primary reason learning to read is forced on kindergartners (vs. 1st grade) despite a hundred years of research which determines conclusively that five and six is developmentally INAPPROPRIATE for learning reading.
    And pushing academics via worksheets, computer programs and testing in K is why play – the OPTIMAL way kids learn- is disappearing.
    Hold onto your wallets, state & district superintendents!

    Reply
    • Nancy Bailey says

      December 30, 2020 at 10:45 pm

      Thanks, Phyllis. I agree about the funding. I hope it will be prioritized in a just and useful manner.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

front cover

An education glossary with an attitude.

Buy Now

front cover

Do we really want an America where we no longer own our public schools?

Buy Now

front cover

This book says “no” to the reforms that fail, and challenges Americans to address the real student needs that will fix public schools and make America strong.

Buy Now

Follow me!

Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Connect With Me!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Nancy E. Bailey Follow

Author, Ph.D. Ed. Leadership and longtime teacher, Blogging for Kids, Teachers, Parents & Democratic Public Schools.

NancyEBailey1
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
beebryhte Belinda Whyte @beebryhte ·
9h

https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/26/the-science-of-reading-and-the-rejection-of-picture-books/
Not sure I could agree more...thanks @NancyEBailey1

Reply on Twitter 1640122924026978304 Retweet on Twitter 1640122924026978304 3 Like on Twitter 1640122924026978304 6 Twitter 1640122924026978304
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
1 Mar

Unstructured play has been driven out of early childhood classrooms for years! Goals are to micromanage everything a child does. Few seem to connect play's importance to learning & mental health, or they don't care if schools fail. https://twitter.com/Cabal_Educator/status/1630938079170109440

Kimberly Blodgett @Cabal_Educator

Let them play!

Reply on Twitter 1630961018854621185 Retweet on Twitter 1630961018854621185 8 Like on Twitter 1630961018854621185 14 Twitter 1630961018854621185
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
10h

Science of Reading camp never discusses the importance of picture books. How much time do children get to explore them? How often are they read to for enjoyment? This is worrisome. https://nancyebailey.com/2023/03/26/the-science-of-reading-and-the-rejection-of-picture-books/

Reply on Twitter 1640105213276180480 Retweet on Twitter 1640105213276180480 11 Like on Twitter 1640105213276180480 43 Twitter 1640105213276180480
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
nancyebailey1 Nancy E. Bailey @nancyebailey1 ·
25 Mar

@BetsyDeVos So much research shows that 3rd gr retention is bad for students it's hard to believe you think this is fine. There are many alternatives. https://nancyebailey.com/2017/10/09/force-flunk-destroying-a-childs-love-of-reading-and-their-life/

Reply on Twitter 1639663340321492995 Retweet on Twitter 1639663340321492995 3 Like on Twitter 1639663340321492995 16 Twitter 1639663340321492995
Retweet on Twitter Nancy E. Bailey Retweeted
jerseyjazzman Jersey Jazzman (Official... no, really) @jerseyjazzman ·
25 Mar

We "get to know where the money is being spent"? Great! So every private school receiving tax dollars will have to open their books and be subject to the same standards of financial transparency as public schools, right? Right?

(Is this thing on?) https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1639291755479613441

House Republicans @HouseGOP

"Today was a win for every mother, every father, but most importantly, for every student in America. You have a Parents Bill of Rights now." - @SpeakerMcCarthy

Reply on Twitter 1639629781057560581 Retweet on Twitter 1639629781057560581 16 Like on Twitter 1639629781057560581 60 Twitter 1639629781057560581
Load More

Archives

Tag Cloud

Arne Duncan Autism Betsy DeVos Bill Gates charter schools class size Common Core Common Core covid-19 disabilities dyslexia early childhood education Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Florida high-stakes testing kindergarten learning disabilities Online Learning parents Personalized Learning phonics preschool private schools privatization public schools reading recess retention School Choice school libraries School Privatization school reform schools Social Emotional Learning special education students Students with Disabilities Teacher Preparation teachers Teach for America teaching Technology testing the arts vouchers

Copyright © 2023 Nancy E. Bailey · Website powered by Standing Pine Media.